Single energy metal artifact reduction performs better than virtual monoenergetic dual-energy reconstruction in CT of the equine proximal phalanx

被引:2
|
作者
Faulkner, Josephine E. [1 ]
Broeckx, Bart J. G. [2 ]
Martens, Ann [3 ]
Raes, Els [1 ]
Haardt, Hanna [3 ]
Vanderperren, Katrien [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, Fac Vet Med, Dept Morphol Imaging Orthoped Rehabil & Nutr, Salisburylaan 133, B-9820 Merelbeke, Belgium
[2] Univ Ghent, Fac Vet Med, Dept Vet & Biosci, Merelbeke, Belgium
[3] Univ Ghent, Fac Vet Med, Dept Large Anim Surg Anesthesia & Orthoped, Ghent, Belgium
关键词
blooming artifact; distal limb; horse; image quality; metal implant; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; IMAGING FINDINGS; SAGITTAL GROOVE; HORSES; FRACTURES; CONFIGURATION;
D O I
10.1111/vru.13258
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Metal artifacts in CT negatively impact the evaluation of surgical implants and the surrounding tissues. The aim of this prospective experimental study was to evaluate the ability of a single energy metal artifact reduction (SEMAR (TM), Canon) algorithm and virtual monoenergetic (VM) dual-energy CT (DECT) scanning techniques to reduce metal artifacts from stainless steel screws surgically inserted into the equine proximal phalanx. Seven acquisitions of 18 cadaver limbs were performed on a Canon Aquilion One Vision CT scanner (Helical +SEMAR, Volume +SEMAR, Standard Helical, Standard Volume and VM DECT at 135, 120, and 105 keV) and reconstructed in a bone kernel. Blinded subjective evaluation performed by three observers indicated a significant effect of acquisition in both adjacent tissues (P < 0.001) and distant tissues (P < 0.001) and the best metal artifact reduction was seen with Helical +SEMAR and Volume +SEMAR. The subjective overall preference of CT acquisition type was (1) Helical +SEMAR, (2) Volume +SEMAR, (3) VM DECT 135 keV, (4) VM DECT 120 keV, (5) VM DECT 105 keV, (6) Standard Helical, (7) Standard Volume (P < 0.001). Unblinded objective evaluation performed by one observer showed that VM DECT 120 keV, Helical +SEMAR, and Volume +SEMAR performed similarly and were objectively the best at reducing blooming artifact. Overall, the best metal artifact reduction was obtained with SEMAR, followed by VM DECT. However, VM DECT performance varies with energy level and was associated with decreased image quality in distant tissues and artifactual overcorrection of metal artifacts at high energy levels.
引用
收藏
页码:677 / 685
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Noise-optimised virtual monoenergetic imaging of dual-energy CT: effect on metal artefact reduction in patients with lumbar internal fixation
    Yanwei Zeng
    Kai Deng
    Haitao Yang
    Yi Tan
    Jun Liu
    Daoying Geng
    Jun Zhang
    European Spine Journal, 2019, 28 : 1783 - 1792
  • [32] Analysis of metal artifact reduction tools for dental hardware in CT scans of the oral cavity: kVp, iterative reconstruction, dual-energy CT, metal artifact reduction software: does it make a difference?
    An De Crop
    Jan Casselman
    Tom Van Hoof
    Melissa Dierens
    Elke Vereecke
    Nicolas Bossu
    Jaime Pamplona
    Katharina D’Herde
    Hubert Thierens
    Klaus Bacher
    Neuroradiology, 2015, 57 : 841 - 849
  • [33] Analysis of metal artifact reduction tools for dental hardware in CT scans of the oral cavity: kVp, iterative reconstruction, dual-energy CT, metal artifact reduction software: does it make a difference?
    De Crop, An
    Casselman, Jan
    Van Hoof, Tom
    Dierens, Melissa
    Vereecke, Elke
    Bossu, Nicolas
    Pamplona, Jaime
    D'Herde, Katharina
    Thierens, Hubert
    Bacher, Klaus
    NEURORADIOLOGY, 2015, 57 (08) : 841 - 849
  • [34] Noise-optimised virtual monoenergetic imaging of dual-energy CT: effect on metal artefact reduction in patients with lumbar internal fixation
    Zeng, Yanwei
    Deng, Kai
    Yang, Haitao
    Tan, Yi
    Liu, Jun
    Geng, Daoying
    Zhang, Jun
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2019, 28 (08) : 1783 - 1792
  • [35] Single-Source Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Use of Monoenergetic Extrapolation for a Reduction of Metal Artifacts
    Mangold, Stefanie
    Gatidis, Sergios
    Luz, Oliver
    Koenig, Benjamin
    Schabel, Christoph
    Bongers, Malte N.
    Flohr, Thomas G.
    Claussen, Claus D.
    Thomas, Christoph
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2014, 49 (12) : 788 - 793
  • [36] Improved Imaging of intraspinal Lymphomas by means of virtual monoenergetic Reconstructions of Dual-energy CT
    Hokamp, Nils Grosse
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2018, 190 (07): : 638 - +
  • [37] Benefits of iterative metal artifact reduction and dual-energy CT towards mitigating artifact in the setting of total shoulder prostheses
    Payam Mohammadinejad
    Francis I. Baffour
    Mark C. Adkins
    Lifeng Yu
    Cynthia H. McCollough
    Joel G. Fletcher
    Katrina N. Glazebrook
    Skeletal Radiology, 2021, 50 : 51 - 58
  • [38] Dual energy CT angiography: pros and cons of dual-energy metal artifact reduction algorithm in patients after endovascular aortic repair
    Johannes Boos
    Jieming Fang
    Benedikt H. Heidinger
    Vassilios Raptopoulos
    Olga R. Brook
    Abdominal Radiology, 2017, 42 : 749 - 758
  • [39] Advanced virtual monoenergetic images: improving the contrast of dual-energy CT pulmonary angiography
    Meier, A.
    Wurnig, M.
    Desbiolles, L.
    Leschka, S.
    Frauenfelder, T.
    Alkadhi, H.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2015, 70 (11) : 1244 - 1251
  • [40] Metal Artifact Reduction: Added Value of Rapid-Kilovoltage-Switching Dual-Energy CT in Relation to Single-Energy CT in a Piglet Animal Model
    Takrouri, Heba S.
    Alnassar, Mutaz M.
    Amirabadi, Afsaneh
    Babyn, Paul S.
    Moineddin, Rahim
    Padfield, Nancy L.
    BenDavid, Guila
    Doria, Andrea S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2015, 205 (03) : W352 - W359