Single energy metal artifact reduction performs better than virtual monoenergetic dual-energy reconstruction in CT of the equine proximal phalanx

被引:2
|
作者
Faulkner, Josephine E. [1 ]
Broeckx, Bart J. G. [2 ]
Martens, Ann [3 ]
Raes, Els [1 ]
Haardt, Hanna [3 ]
Vanderperren, Katrien [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, Fac Vet Med, Dept Morphol Imaging Orthoped Rehabil & Nutr, Salisburylaan 133, B-9820 Merelbeke, Belgium
[2] Univ Ghent, Fac Vet Med, Dept Vet & Biosci, Merelbeke, Belgium
[3] Univ Ghent, Fac Vet Med, Dept Large Anim Surg Anesthesia & Orthoped, Ghent, Belgium
关键词
blooming artifact; distal limb; horse; image quality; metal implant; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; IMAGING FINDINGS; SAGITTAL GROOVE; HORSES; FRACTURES; CONFIGURATION;
D O I
10.1111/vru.13258
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Metal artifacts in CT negatively impact the evaluation of surgical implants and the surrounding tissues. The aim of this prospective experimental study was to evaluate the ability of a single energy metal artifact reduction (SEMAR (TM), Canon) algorithm and virtual monoenergetic (VM) dual-energy CT (DECT) scanning techniques to reduce metal artifacts from stainless steel screws surgically inserted into the equine proximal phalanx. Seven acquisitions of 18 cadaver limbs were performed on a Canon Aquilion One Vision CT scanner (Helical +SEMAR, Volume +SEMAR, Standard Helical, Standard Volume and VM DECT at 135, 120, and 105 keV) and reconstructed in a bone kernel. Blinded subjective evaluation performed by three observers indicated a significant effect of acquisition in both adjacent tissues (P < 0.001) and distant tissues (P < 0.001) and the best metal artifact reduction was seen with Helical +SEMAR and Volume +SEMAR. The subjective overall preference of CT acquisition type was (1) Helical +SEMAR, (2) Volume +SEMAR, (3) VM DECT 135 keV, (4) VM DECT 120 keV, (5) VM DECT 105 keV, (6) Standard Helical, (7) Standard Volume (P < 0.001). Unblinded objective evaluation performed by one observer showed that VM DECT 120 keV, Helical +SEMAR, and Volume +SEMAR performed similarly and were objectively the best at reducing blooming artifact. Overall, the best metal artifact reduction was obtained with SEMAR, followed by VM DECT. However, VM DECT performance varies with energy level and was associated with decreased image quality in distant tissues and artifactual overcorrection of metal artifacts at high energy levels.
引用
收藏
页码:677 / 685
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Metal artifact reduction for small metal implants on CT: Which image reconstruction algorithm performs better?
    Grandmougin, Aurelie
    Bakour, Omar
    Villani, Nicolas
    Baumann, Cedric
    Rousseau, Helene
    Teixeira, Pedro Augusto Gondim
    Blum, Alain
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2020, 127
  • [22] Reduction of metal artifacts from unilateral hip arthroplasty on dual-energy CT with metal artifact reduction software
    Yue, Dong
    Rong, Cheng Fan
    Ning, Cai
    Liang, Hu
    Lian, Liu Ai
    Xin, Wang Ru
    Hong, Luo Ya
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2018, 59 (07) : 853 - 860
  • [23] Metal artifact reduction by dual energy computed tomography using monoenergetic extrapolation
    Fabian Bamberg
    Alexander Dierks
    Konstantin Nikolaou
    Maximilian F. Reiser
    Christoph R. Becker
    Thorsten R. C. Johnson
    European Radiology, 2011, 21 : 1424 - 1429
  • [24] Metal artifact reduction by dual energy computed tomography using monoenergetic extrapolation
    Bamberg, Fabian
    Dierks, Alexander
    Nikolaou, Konstantin
    Reiser, Maximilian F.
    Becker, Christoph R.
    Johnson, Thorsten R. C.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2011, 21 (07) : 1424 - 1429
  • [25] Metal Artifact Reduction in Pelvic Computed Tomography With Hip Prostheses Comparison of Virtual Monoenergetic Extrapolations From Dual-Energy Computed Tomography and an Iterative Metal Artifact Reduction Algorithmin a Phantom Study
    Higashigaito, Kai
    Angst, Florian
    Runge, Val M.
    Alkadhi, Hatem
    Donati, Olivio F.
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2015, 50 (12) : 828 - 834
  • [26] Effects of Monoenergetic Reconstruction of Dual-Energy CT on Target Delineation of Prostate Patients
    Cabrera, J.
    Grimm, R.
    Goddard, L. C.
    Basavatia, A. K.
    Tome, W. A.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 51 (10) : 7746 - 7747
  • [27] A Dual-Energy Metal Artifact Redcution Method for DECT Image Reconstruction
    Lyu, Tianling
    Zhao, Wei
    Gao, Wei
    Zhu, Jian
    Xi, Yan
    Chen, Yang
    Zhu, Wentao
    2023 45TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE & BIOLOGY SOCIETY, EMBC, 2023,
  • [28] Clinical Assessment of Metal Artifact Reduction Methods in Dual-Energy CT Examinations of Instrumented Spines
    Long, Zaiyang
    DeLone, David R.
    Kotsenas, Amy L.
    Lehman, Vance T.
    Nagelschneider, Alex A.
    Michalak, Gregory J.
    Fletcher, Joel G.
    McCollough, Cynthia H.
    Yu, Lifeng
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2019, 212 (02) : 395 - 401
  • [29] Low-KeV Virtual Monoenergetic Dual-Energy CT with Deep Learning Reconstruction for Assessing Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Ota, Takashi
    Nakamoto, Atsushi
    Onishi, Hiromitsu
    Tsuboyama, Takahiro
    Matsumoto, Shohei
    Fukui, Hideyuki
    Kaketaka, Koki
    Honda, Toru
    Kiso, Kengo
    Tatsumi, Mitsuaki
    Tomiyama, Noriyuki
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL AND BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2024, 44 (02) : 293 - 306
  • [30] Dual-Energy CBCT Imaging for Metal Artifact Reduction and Contrast Enhancement
    Li, H.
    Giles, W.
    Ren, L.
    Bowsher, J.
    Yin, F.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (06) : 4017 - 4017