The accuracy of dynamic computer assisted implant surgery in fully edentulous jaws: A retrospective case series

被引:6
|
作者
Wang, Jiayi [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Ge, Yanjun [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ,10 ]
Muhlemann, Sven [9 ]
Pan, Shaoxia [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ,10 ]
Jung, Ronald E. [9 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Sch & Hosp Stomatol, Dept Orthodont, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Natl Ctr Stomatol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Natl Clin Res Ctr Oral Dis, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Natl Engn Res Ctr Oral Biomat & Digital Med Device, Beijing, Peoples R China
[5] Beijing Key Lab Digital Stomatol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[6] Res Ctr Engn & Technol Computerized Dent Minist Hl, Beijing, Peoples R China
[7] NMPA Key Lab Dent Mat, Beijing, Peoples R China
[8] Peking Univ, Sch & Hosp Stomatol, Dept Prosthodont, Beijing, Peoples R China
[9] Univ Zurich, Ctr Dent Med, Clin Reconstruct Dent, Zurich, Switzerland
[10] Peking Univ, Sch & Hosp Stomatol, Dept Prosthodont, 22 Zhongguancun South Ave, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
基金
北京市自然科学基金;
关键词
accuracy; CAIS; dynamic navigation; edentulous; implant; PLACEMENT;
D O I
10.1111/clr.14168
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: To evaluate the accuracy of implant placement using a dynamic navigation system in fully edentulous jaws and to analyze the influence of implant distribution on implant position accuracy. Materials and Methods: Edentulous patients who received implant placement using a dynamic navigation system were included. Four to six mini screws were placed in the edentulous jaw under local anesthesia as fiducial markers. Then patients received CBCT scans. Virtual implant positions were designed in the planning software based on CBCT data. Under local anesthesia, implants were inserted under the guidance of the dynamic navigation system. CBCTs were taken following implant placement. The deviation between the actual and planned implant positions was measured by comparing the pre- and postsurgery CBCT. Results: A total of 13 edentulous patients with 13 edentulous maxillae and 7 edentulous mandibles were included, and 108 implants were placed. The average linear deviations at the implant entry point and apex were 1.08 +/- 0.52 mm and 1.15 +/- 0.60 mm, respectively. The average angular deviation was 2.85 +/- 1.20 degrees. No significant difference was detected in linear and angular deviations between the maxillary and mandibular implants, neither between the anterior and posterior implants. Conclusions: The dynamic navigation system provides high accuracy for implant placement in fully edentulous jaws, while the distribution of the implants showed little impact on implant position accuracy.
引用
收藏
页码:1278 / 1288
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Computer-assisted implant surgery and immediate loading in edentulous ridges with dental fresh extraction sockets. Two years results of a prospective case series study
    Meloni, Silvio Mario
    De Riu, G.
    Pisano, M.
    Orabona, G. Dell'Aversana
    Piombino, P.
    Salzano, G.
    Quarato, D.
    Riccardi, E.
    Belli, E.
    Ungari, C.
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2013, 17 (21) : 2968 - 2973
  • [42] Accuracy of freehand surgery, static and dynamic computer assisted surgery on zygomatic implant placement: A systematic review and meta-analyses
    Traboulsi-Garet, Bassel
    Jorba-Garcia, Adria
    Bara-Casaus, Javier
    Camps-Font, Octavi
    Valmaseda-Castellon, Eduard
    Figueiredo, Rui
    Sanchez-Garces, Angels
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2025, 53 (04) : 301 - 311
  • [43] Influence of template design on the accuracy of static computer-assisted implant surgery
    Chung, Jinmook
    Park, Junghyun
    Son, Hyeonseong
    Hong, Seoung-Jin
    Pae, Ahran
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED PROSTHODONTICS, 2025, 17 (01): : 22 - 35
  • [44] The Influence of Surgical Experience and Bone Density on the Accuracy of Static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery in Edentulous Jaws Using a Mucosa-Supported Surgical Template with a Half-Guided Implant Placement Protocol-A Randomized Clinical Study
    Kivovics, Marton
    Penzes, Dorottya
    Nemeth, Orsolya
    Mijiritsky, Eitan
    MATERIALS, 2020, 13 (24) : 1 - 12
  • [45] Influence of implant macrodesign and insertion connection technology on the accuracy of static computer-assisted implant surgery
    El Kholy, Karim
    Ebenezer, Supriya
    Wittneben, Julia-Gabriela
    Lazarin, Rafael
    Rousson, Dominique
    Buser, Daniel
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2019, 21 (05) : 1073 - 1079
  • [46] The Impact of Surgical Guide Fixation and Implant Location on Accuracy of Static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery
    Pessoa, Roberto
    Siqueira, Rafael
    Li, Junying
    Saleh, Islam
    Meneghetti, Priscila
    Bezerra, Fabio
    Wang, Hom-Lay
    Mendonca, Gustavo
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2022, 31 (02): : 155 - 164
  • [47] Accuracy of Implant Guided Surgery in Fully Edentulous Patients: Prediction vs. Actual Outcome-Systematic Review
    Azevedo, Mafalda
    Correia, Francisco
    Almeida, Ricardo Faria
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (17)
  • [48] The Accuracy of Zygomatic Implant Placement Assisted by Dynamic Computer-Aided Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Fan, Shengchi
    Saenz-Ravello, Gustavo
    Diaz, Leonardo
    Wu, Yiqun
    Davo, Ruben
    Wang, Feng
    Magic, Marko
    Al-Nawas, Bilal
    Kaemmerer, Peer W.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (16)
  • [49] Implant position accuracy using dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery (CAIS) combined with augmented reality: A randomized controlled clinical trial
    Arunjaroensuk, Sirida
    Yotpibulwong, Thanida
    Fu, Po-Sung
    Wang, Jen-Chyan
    Hung, Chun-Cheng
    Mattheos, Nikos
    Pimkhaokham, Atiphan
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCIENCES, 2024, 19 : S44 - S50
  • [50] Accuracy of implant placement with a combined use of static and dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery in single tooth space: A randomized controlled trial
    Yotpibulwong, Thanida
    Arunjaroensuk, Sirida
    Kaboosaya, Boosana
    Sinpitaksakul, Phonkit
    Arksornnukit, Mansuang
    Mattheos, Nikos
    Pimkhaokham, Atiphan
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2023, 34 (04) : 330 - 341