Influence of resident involvement on fluoroscopy time and ionizing radiation exposure in fluoroscopy-guided spinal procedures

被引:0
|
作者
Soucy, Beatrice [1 ]
Lee, Dillon [2 ]
Moreau-Bourbonnais, Amelie [3 ]
Filiatrault, Marc [1 ]
Denis, Isabelle [1 ]
Chang, Min Cheol [4 ]
Boudier-Reveret, Mathieu [1 ]
机构
[1] CHU Montreal, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] CISSS Laurentides, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, St Jerome, PQ, Canada
[4] Yeungnam Univ, Coll Med, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Taegu, South Korea
关键词
BODY-MASS INDEX; PROTECTION; INJECTIONS; PHYSICIANS; OPERATOR; PROGRAM; LEVEL;
D O I
10.1002/pmrj.13066
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Background: Fluoroscopic guidance has become the standard for a variety of medical procedures. Mastering these techniques requires practice, which may entail additional radiation for patients and providers. Despite their widespread use, the literature examining factors influencing radiation exposure in fluoroscopically guided pain procedures is scarce.Objective: To evaluate the influence of resident involvement on radiation exposure during fluoroscopy-guided spinal interventions.Design: Single-center, observational study.Setting: Outpatient physiatry clinic in a teaching hospital.Patients: All patients who received cervical or lumbar facet block(s) (FBs), transforaminal epidural steroid injection(s) (TFESIs) without digital subtraction, or a caudal epidural (CE) during the study period were included.Interventions: Resident involvement in the procedures: absent, observing, or participating.Main Outcome Measures: Machine-indicated fluoroscopy time (seconds) and radiation dose (milligrays [mGy]).Results: Two hundred ninety six procedures were included: 188 FBs (58 cervical, 130 lumbar), 48 CEs, and 60 TFESIs. For lumbar FBs, fluoroscopy time and radiation dose increased significantly when residents performed them (meantime = 24.5 s, confidence interval [CI] = 20.4-28.7; meandose = 3.53 mGy, CI = 2.57-4.49) compared to when they observed (meantime = 9.9 s, CI = 8.1-11.7; meandose = 1.28 mGy, CI = 0.98-1.59) (mean difference: time = 14.63 s, CI = 9.31-19.94; dose = 2.25 mGy, CI = 1.17-3.33) and were absent during the procedure (meantime = 12.9 s, CI = 11.1-14.6; meandose = 1.65 mGy, CI = 1.40-1.89) (mean difference: time = 11.67 s, CI = 7.35-15.98; dose = 1.88 mGy, CI = 1.01-2.76). In the case of TFESIs, time, but not dose, increased significantly when residents observed (meantime = 39.1 s, CI = 30.7-47.6; meandose = 6.73 mGy, CI = 3.39-10.07) compared to when they were absent (meantime = 27.1 s, CI = 22.4-31.8; meandose = 4.41 mGy, CI = 3.06-5.76 (mean difference: time = 11.99 s, CI = 1.37-22.61; dose = 2.32 mGy, CI = -1.20-5.84). Finally, resident involvement did not significantly affect the outcomes for CEs (ptime = .032, pdose = .74) and cervical FBs (ptime = .64, pdose = .68).Conclusion: Resident participation affected lumbar FBs the most, with an increase in both fluoroscopy time and radiation dose.
引用
收藏
页码:260 / 267
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Radiation Exposure in Nonvascular Fluoroscopy-Guided Interventional Procedures
    Roman Kloeckner
    Anton Bersch
    Daniel Pinto dos Santos
    Jens Schneider
    Christoph Düber
    Michael Bernhard Pitton
    CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, 2012, 35 : 613 - 620
  • [2] Radiation Exposure in Nonvascular Fluoroscopy-Guided Interventional Procedures
    Kloeckner, Roman
    Bersch, Anton
    dos Santos, Daniel Pinto
    Schneider, Jens
    Dueber, Christoph
    Pitton, Michael Bernhard
    CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2012, 35 (03) : 613 - 620
  • [3] Use of Artificial Intelligence to Reduce Radiation Exposure at Fluoroscopy-Guided Endoscopic Procedures
    Bang, Ji Young
    Hough, Matthew
    Hawes, Robert H.
    Varadarajulu, Shyam
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 115 (04): : 555 - 561
  • [4] Fluoroscopy-guided procedures in cardiology: is patient exposure being reduced over time?
    Samara, E. T.
    Aroua, A.
    Stauffer, J. -C.
    Bochud, F.
    Verdun, F. R.
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2010, 139 (1-3) : 271 - 274
  • [5] Patient Exposure during Fluoroscopy-guided Pacemaker Implantation Procedures
    Alkhorayef, M.
    Sulieman, A.
    Babikir, E.
    Daar, E.
    Alnaaimi, M.
    Alduaij, M.
    Bradley, D.
    APPLIED RADIATION AND ISOTOPES, 2018, 138 : 14 - 17
  • [6] Patient and staff radiation dose in fluoroscopy-guided TIPS procedures and dose reduction, using dedicated fluoroscopy exposure settings
    Zweers, D
    Geleijns, J
    Aarts, NJM
    Hardam, LJ
    Laméris, JS
    Scultz, FW
    Kool, LJS
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1998, 71 (846): : 672 - 676
  • [7] How should radiation exposure be handled in fluoroscopy-guided endoscopic procedures in the field of gastroenterology?
    Takenaka, Mamoru
    Hosono, Makoto
    Hayashi, Shiro
    Nishida, Tsutomu
    Kudo, Masatoshi
    DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, 2022, 34 (05) : 890 - 900
  • [8] Radiation Exposure of the Hand and Chest during C-arm Fluoroscopy-Guided Procedures
    Jung, Cheol Hee
    Ryu, Jae Sung
    Baek, Seung Woo
    Oh, Ji Hye
    Woo, Nam Sik
    Kim, Hae Kyoung
    Kim, Jae Hun
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2013, 26 (01): : 51 - 56
  • [9] Patient and personnel exposure during CT fluoroscopy-guided interventional procedures
    Nawfel, RD
    Judy, PF
    Silverman, SG
    Hooton, S
    Tuncali, K
    Adams, DF
    RADIOLOGY, 2000, 216 (01) : 180 - 184
  • [10] Radiation exposure dose of fluoroscopy-guided gastrointestinal procedures: A single-center retrospective study
    Hayashi, Shiro
    Nishida, Tsutomu
    Kuriki, Shinji
    Chang, Li-sa
    Aochi, Kazuki
    Meren, Emi
    Sakamoto, Tatsuya
    Tomita, Ryo
    Higaki, Yu
    Osugi, Naoto
    Sugimoto, Aya
    Takahashi, Kei
    Mukai, Kaori
    Matsumoto, Kengo
    Nakamatsu, Dai
    Yamamoto, Masahi
    Fukui, Koji
    Takenaka, Mamoru
    Hosono, Makoto
    Inada, Masami
    ENDOSCOPY INTERNATIONAL OPEN, 2020, 08 (12) : E1872 - E1877