Influence of resident involvement on fluoroscopy time and ionizing radiation exposure in fluoroscopy-guided spinal procedures

被引:0
|
作者
Soucy, Beatrice [1 ]
Lee, Dillon [2 ]
Moreau-Bourbonnais, Amelie [3 ]
Filiatrault, Marc [1 ]
Denis, Isabelle [1 ]
Chang, Min Cheol [4 ]
Boudier-Reveret, Mathieu [1 ]
机构
[1] CHU Montreal, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] CISSS Laurentides, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, St Jerome, PQ, Canada
[4] Yeungnam Univ, Coll Med, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Taegu, South Korea
关键词
BODY-MASS INDEX; PROTECTION; INJECTIONS; PHYSICIANS; OPERATOR; PROGRAM; LEVEL;
D O I
10.1002/pmrj.13066
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Background: Fluoroscopic guidance has become the standard for a variety of medical procedures. Mastering these techniques requires practice, which may entail additional radiation for patients and providers. Despite their widespread use, the literature examining factors influencing radiation exposure in fluoroscopically guided pain procedures is scarce.Objective: To evaluate the influence of resident involvement on radiation exposure during fluoroscopy-guided spinal interventions.Design: Single-center, observational study.Setting: Outpatient physiatry clinic in a teaching hospital.Patients: All patients who received cervical or lumbar facet block(s) (FBs), transforaminal epidural steroid injection(s) (TFESIs) without digital subtraction, or a caudal epidural (CE) during the study period were included.Interventions: Resident involvement in the procedures: absent, observing, or participating.Main Outcome Measures: Machine-indicated fluoroscopy time (seconds) and radiation dose (milligrays [mGy]).Results: Two hundred ninety six procedures were included: 188 FBs (58 cervical, 130 lumbar), 48 CEs, and 60 TFESIs. For lumbar FBs, fluoroscopy time and radiation dose increased significantly when residents performed them (meantime = 24.5 s, confidence interval [CI] = 20.4-28.7; meandose = 3.53 mGy, CI = 2.57-4.49) compared to when they observed (meantime = 9.9 s, CI = 8.1-11.7; meandose = 1.28 mGy, CI = 0.98-1.59) (mean difference: time = 14.63 s, CI = 9.31-19.94; dose = 2.25 mGy, CI = 1.17-3.33) and were absent during the procedure (meantime = 12.9 s, CI = 11.1-14.6; meandose = 1.65 mGy, CI = 1.40-1.89) (mean difference: time = 11.67 s, CI = 7.35-15.98; dose = 1.88 mGy, CI = 1.01-2.76). In the case of TFESIs, time, but not dose, increased significantly when residents observed (meantime = 39.1 s, CI = 30.7-47.6; meandose = 6.73 mGy, CI = 3.39-10.07) compared to when they were absent (meantime = 27.1 s, CI = 22.4-31.8; meandose = 4.41 mGy, CI = 3.06-5.76 (mean difference: time = 11.99 s, CI = 1.37-22.61; dose = 2.32 mGy, CI = -1.20-5.84). Finally, resident involvement did not significantly affect the outcomes for CEs (ptime = .032, pdose = .74) and cervical FBs (ptime = .64, pdose = .68).Conclusion: Resident participation affected lumbar FBs the most, with an increase in both fluoroscopy time and radiation dose.
引用
收藏
页码:260 / 267
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Radiodermatitis after fluoroscopy-guided diagnostic and therapeutic procedures
    Freixas, Patricia Bassas
    Soler, Ramon Bartralot
    Espanol, Gloria Aparicio
    Briones, Vicente Garcia-Patos
    MEDICINA CLINICA, 2007, 129 (10): : 397 - 398
  • [22] New Optimization Strategies on Radiation Protection in Fluoroscopy-Guided Interventional Procedures in Pediatrics
    Ubeda, Carlos
    CHILDREN-BASEL, 2023, 10 (05):
  • [23] DeepDRR - A Catalyst for Machine Learning in Fluoroscopy-Guided Procedures
    Unberath, Mathias
    Zaech, Jan-Nico
    Lee, Sing Chun
    Bier, Bastian
    Fotouhi, Javad
    Armand, Mehran
    Navab, Nassir
    MEDICAL IMAGE COMPUTING AND COMPUTER ASSISTED INTERVENTION - MICCAI 2018, PT IV, 2018, 11073 : 98 - 106
  • [24] Biplane fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous spinal cord stimulation
    Miura, I.
    Horisawa, S.
    Kawamata, T.
    Taira, T.
    NEUROCHIRURGIE, 2023, 69 (05)
  • [25] Radiation exposure in fluoroscopy-guided anterior total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review
    Baksh, Nayeem
    Wei, Lulu
    Ho, Elver S.
    Zhou, Jack J.
    Stekas, Nicholas D.
    Eldib, Ahmed M.
    Naziri, Qais
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2022, 32 (05): : 891 - 897
  • [26] Radiation exposure and its reduction in the fluoroscopic examination and fluoroscopy-guided interventional radiology
    Jeong, Woo Kyoung
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2011, 54 (12): : 1269 - 1276
  • [27] Radiation exposure in fluoroscopy-guided anterior total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review
    Nayeem Baksh
    Lulu Wei
    Elver S. Ho
    Jack J. Zhou
    Nicholas D. Stekas
    Ahmed M. Eldib
    Qais Naziri
    European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2022, 32 : 891 - 897
  • [28] Radiation Exposure during Fluoroscopy-Guided Ozone Chemonucleolysis for Lumbar Disc Herniation
    Leoni, Matteo Luigi Giuseppe
    Vitali, Sara
    Micheli, Fabrizio
    Mercieri, Marco
    Varrassi, Giustino
    Casale, Roberto
    Occhigrossi, Felice
    Giordano, Carlo
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (24)
  • [29] FLUOROSCOPY-GUIDED BILIARY PROCEDURES IN A PREGNANT, LIVER TRANSPLANT PATIENT: FETUS RADIATION PROTECTION
    Gerasia, R.
    Cannataci, C.
    Gallo, G. S.
    Tafaro, C.
    Caruso, C.
    Maruzzelli, L.
    Miraglia, R.
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2020, 192 (03) : 396 - 401
  • [30] Efficacy of therapeutic fluoroscopy-guided lumbar spine interventional procedures
    Galhom, Ayman E.
    al-Shatouri, Mohammad A.
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2013, 37 (04) : 649 - 656