Influence of resident involvement on fluoroscopy time and ionizing radiation exposure in fluoroscopy-guided spinal procedures

被引:0
|
作者
Soucy, Beatrice [1 ]
Lee, Dillon [2 ]
Moreau-Bourbonnais, Amelie [3 ]
Filiatrault, Marc [1 ]
Denis, Isabelle [1 ]
Chang, Min Cheol [4 ]
Boudier-Reveret, Mathieu [1 ]
机构
[1] CHU Montreal, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] CISSS Laurentides, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, St Jerome, PQ, Canada
[4] Yeungnam Univ, Coll Med, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Taegu, South Korea
关键词
BODY-MASS INDEX; PROTECTION; INJECTIONS; PHYSICIANS; OPERATOR; PROGRAM; LEVEL;
D O I
10.1002/pmrj.13066
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Background: Fluoroscopic guidance has become the standard for a variety of medical procedures. Mastering these techniques requires practice, which may entail additional radiation for patients and providers. Despite their widespread use, the literature examining factors influencing radiation exposure in fluoroscopically guided pain procedures is scarce.Objective: To evaluate the influence of resident involvement on radiation exposure during fluoroscopy-guided spinal interventions.Design: Single-center, observational study.Setting: Outpatient physiatry clinic in a teaching hospital.Patients: All patients who received cervical or lumbar facet block(s) (FBs), transforaminal epidural steroid injection(s) (TFESIs) without digital subtraction, or a caudal epidural (CE) during the study period were included.Interventions: Resident involvement in the procedures: absent, observing, or participating.Main Outcome Measures: Machine-indicated fluoroscopy time (seconds) and radiation dose (milligrays [mGy]).Results: Two hundred ninety six procedures were included: 188 FBs (58 cervical, 130 lumbar), 48 CEs, and 60 TFESIs. For lumbar FBs, fluoroscopy time and radiation dose increased significantly when residents performed them (meantime = 24.5 s, confidence interval [CI] = 20.4-28.7; meandose = 3.53 mGy, CI = 2.57-4.49) compared to when they observed (meantime = 9.9 s, CI = 8.1-11.7; meandose = 1.28 mGy, CI = 0.98-1.59) (mean difference: time = 14.63 s, CI = 9.31-19.94; dose = 2.25 mGy, CI = 1.17-3.33) and were absent during the procedure (meantime = 12.9 s, CI = 11.1-14.6; meandose = 1.65 mGy, CI = 1.40-1.89) (mean difference: time = 11.67 s, CI = 7.35-15.98; dose = 1.88 mGy, CI = 1.01-2.76). In the case of TFESIs, time, but not dose, increased significantly when residents observed (meantime = 39.1 s, CI = 30.7-47.6; meandose = 6.73 mGy, CI = 3.39-10.07) compared to when they were absent (meantime = 27.1 s, CI = 22.4-31.8; meandose = 4.41 mGy, CI = 3.06-5.76 (mean difference: time = 11.99 s, CI = 1.37-22.61; dose = 2.32 mGy, CI = -1.20-5.84). Finally, resident involvement did not significantly affect the outcomes for CEs (ptime = .032, pdose = .74) and cervical FBs (ptime = .64, pdose = .68).Conclusion: Resident participation affected lumbar FBs the most, with an increase in both fluoroscopy time and radiation dose.
引用
收藏
页码:260 / 267
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Fluoroscopy-Guided Radiation Dose; Best Correlated to Patient Thickness
    Strauss, K.
    Nachabe, R.
    Racadio, J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (06) : 3718 - 3718
  • [32] Fluoroscopy-guided versus CT-guided Lumbar Steroid Injections: Comparison of Radiation Exposure and Outcomes
    Dietrich, Tobias J.
    Peterson, Cynthia K.
    Zeimpekis, Konstantinos G.
    Bensler, Susanne
    Sutter, Reto
    Pfirrmann, Christian W. A.
    RADIOLOGY, 2019, 290 (03) : 752 - 759
  • [33] Trends in Fluoroscopy Time in Fluoroscopy-Guided Lumbar Punctures Performed by Trainees Over an Academic Year
    Nayate, Ameya P.
    Schmitt, James E.
    Mohan, Suyash
    Nasrallah, Ilya M.
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2017, 24 (03) : 373 - 380
  • [34] Radiation Eye Dose for Physicians in CT Fluoroscopy-Guided Biopsy
    Inaba, Yohei
    Hitachi, Shin
    Watanuki, Munenori
    Chida, Koichi
    TOMOGRAPHY, 2022, 8 (01) : 438 - 446
  • [35] Impact of equipment technology on reference levels in fluoroscopy-guided gastrointestinal procedures
    Rehani, Madan M.
    Li, Xinhua
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 120
  • [36] The Radiation Exposure of Radiographer Related to the Location in C-arm Fluoroscopy-guided Pain Interventions
    Chang, Young Jae
    Kim, Ah Na
    Oh, In Su
    Woo, Nam Sik
    Kim, Hae Kyoung
    Kim, Jae Hun
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2014, 27 (02): : 162 - 167
  • [37] Radiation Exposure for Fluoroscopy-guided Lumbosacral Epidural Steroid Injections Comparison of the Transforaminal and Caudal Approaches
    Kim, Seon-Jeong
    Lee, Min Hee
    Lee, Sheen-Woo
    Chung, Hye Won
    Lee, Sang Hoon
    Shin, Myung Jin
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2014, 27 (01): : E37 - E40
  • [38] Radiation dose to the radiologist during continuous CT fluoroscopy-guided interventions
    Schulz, E
    Leibecke, T
    Melchert, UH
    Weiss, HD
    Stoeckelhuber, BM
    RADIOLOGY, 2002, 225 : 194 - 194
  • [39] Surgical Staff Radiation Protection During Fluoroscopy-Guided Urologic Interventions
    Galonnier, Francois
    Traxer, Olivier
    Rosec, Maeva
    Terrasa, Jean-Baptiste
    Gouezel, Pascal
    Celier, David
    Bassinet, Celine
    Ruffion, Alain
    Paparel, Philipe
    Fiard, Gaelle
    Terrier, Jean-Etienne
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2016, 30 (06) : 638 - 643
  • [40] Potential risk assessment: a model for quality evaluation in fluoroscopy-guided interventional procedures
    Oliveira, Marcus
    Navarro, Marcus
    Costa, Eliana
    Kremer, Djeimis
    Pinheiro, Regina
    Freitas, Vanessa
    Modesto, Igor
    Macedo, Erik
    Ferreira, Jeovana
    Andrade, Daniele
    Damasceno, Lauro
    Joseneas, Enoque
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2024, 200 (07) : 693 - 699