Influence of resident involvement on fluoroscopy time and ionizing radiation exposure in fluoroscopy-guided spinal procedures

被引:0
|
作者
Soucy, Beatrice [1 ]
Lee, Dillon [2 ]
Moreau-Bourbonnais, Amelie [3 ]
Filiatrault, Marc [1 ]
Denis, Isabelle [1 ]
Chang, Min Cheol [4 ]
Boudier-Reveret, Mathieu [1 ]
机构
[1] CHU Montreal, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] CISSS Laurentides, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, St Jerome, PQ, Canada
[4] Yeungnam Univ, Coll Med, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Taegu, South Korea
关键词
BODY-MASS INDEX; PROTECTION; INJECTIONS; PHYSICIANS; OPERATOR; PROGRAM; LEVEL;
D O I
10.1002/pmrj.13066
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Background: Fluoroscopic guidance has become the standard for a variety of medical procedures. Mastering these techniques requires practice, which may entail additional radiation for patients and providers. Despite their widespread use, the literature examining factors influencing radiation exposure in fluoroscopically guided pain procedures is scarce.Objective: To evaluate the influence of resident involvement on radiation exposure during fluoroscopy-guided spinal interventions.Design: Single-center, observational study.Setting: Outpatient physiatry clinic in a teaching hospital.Patients: All patients who received cervical or lumbar facet block(s) (FBs), transforaminal epidural steroid injection(s) (TFESIs) without digital subtraction, or a caudal epidural (CE) during the study period were included.Interventions: Resident involvement in the procedures: absent, observing, or participating.Main Outcome Measures: Machine-indicated fluoroscopy time (seconds) and radiation dose (milligrays [mGy]).Results: Two hundred ninety six procedures were included: 188 FBs (58 cervical, 130 lumbar), 48 CEs, and 60 TFESIs. For lumbar FBs, fluoroscopy time and radiation dose increased significantly when residents performed them (meantime = 24.5 s, confidence interval [CI] = 20.4-28.7; meandose = 3.53 mGy, CI = 2.57-4.49) compared to when they observed (meantime = 9.9 s, CI = 8.1-11.7; meandose = 1.28 mGy, CI = 0.98-1.59) (mean difference: time = 14.63 s, CI = 9.31-19.94; dose = 2.25 mGy, CI = 1.17-3.33) and were absent during the procedure (meantime = 12.9 s, CI = 11.1-14.6; meandose = 1.65 mGy, CI = 1.40-1.89) (mean difference: time = 11.67 s, CI = 7.35-15.98; dose = 1.88 mGy, CI = 1.01-2.76). In the case of TFESIs, time, but not dose, increased significantly when residents observed (meantime = 39.1 s, CI = 30.7-47.6; meandose = 6.73 mGy, CI = 3.39-10.07) compared to when they were absent (meantime = 27.1 s, CI = 22.4-31.8; meandose = 4.41 mGy, CI = 3.06-5.76 (mean difference: time = 11.99 s, CI = 1.37-22.61; dose = 2.32 mGy, CI = -1.20-5.84). Finally, resident involvement did not significantly affect the outcomes for CEs (ptime = .032, pdose = .74) and cervical FBs (ptime = .64, pdose = .68).Conclusion: Resident participation affected lumbar FBs the most, with an increase in both fluoroscopy time and radiation dose.
引用
收藏
页码:260 / 267
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effectiveness of Attaching a Lead Drape to a Radioprotective Shield for CT Fluoroscopy-Guided Procedures
    Hasegawa, Takaaki
    Shimizu, Hidetoshi
    Asai, Tsubasa
    Furuya, Yuichiro
    Hattori, Hisashi
    Inaba, Yoshitaka
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2024, 35 (06) : 936 - 938
  • [42] Navigation for Fluoroscopy-Guided Cryo-Balloon Ablation Procedures of Atrial Fibrillation
    Bourier, Felix
    Brost, Alexander
    Kleinoeder, Andreas
    Kurzendorfer, Tanja
    Koch, Martin
    Kiraly, Atilla
    Schneider, Hans-Juergen
    Hornegger, Joachim
    Strobel, Norbert
    Kurzidim, Klaus
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2012: IMAGE-GUIDED PROCEDURES, ROBOTIC INTERVENTIONS, AND MODELING, 2012, 8316
  • [43] First experience of efficacy and radiation exposure in 320-detector row CT fluoroscopy-guided interventions
    Yamamoto, Shota
    Matsumoto, Tomohiro
    Suda, Satoshi
    Tomita, Kosuke
    Kamei, Shunsuke
    Hashida, Kazunobu
    Imai, Yutaka
    Endo, Kazuyuki
    Murakami, Katsuki
    Hasebe, Terumitsu
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 94 (1120):
  • [44] Comparison of Radiation Exposure during Fluoroscopy-Guided Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injections at Different Vertebral Levels
    Hwang, Yun Mi
    Lee, Min Hee
    Kim, Seon-Jeong
    Lee, Sheen-Woo
    Chung, Hye Won
    Lee, Sang Hoon
    Shin, Myung Jin
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2015, 16 (02) : 357 - 362
  • [45] A preclinical model of CT fluoroscopy-guided spinal procedures to test DRG-targeted delivery of resiniferatoxin (RTX)
    Pleticha, J.
    Maus, T.
    Diehn, F.
    Hettler, F.
    Haupt, D.
    Bongers, L.
    Heilmann, L.
    Kanwar, R.
    Jones, B.
    Kenney, B.
    Royal, M.
    Yaksh, T.
    Iadarola, M.
    Beutler, A.
    JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2015, 16 (04): : S77 - S77
  • [46] Radiation dose of fluoroscopy-guided versus ultralow-dose CT-fluoroscopy-guided lumbar spine epidural steroid injections
    Wieschhoff, Ged G.
    Miskin, Nityanand P.
    Kim, Jeom Soon
    Hamberg, Leena M.
    Mandell, Jacob C.
    SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2022, 51 (05) : 1055 - 1062
  • [47] Radiation dose of fluoroscopy-guided versus ultralow-dose CT-fluoroscopy-guided lumbar spine epidural steroid injections
    Ged G. Wieschhoff
    Nityanand P. Miskin
    Jeom Soon Kim
    Leena M. Hamberg
    Jacob C. Mandell
    Skeletal Radiology, 2022, 51 : 1055 - 1062
  • [48] Fluoroscopy-Guided Lumbar Spinal Nerve Stimulation to Treat Chronic Scrotal Pain
    Haider, Naeem
    Gargya, Akshat
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (07)
  • [49] Fluoroscopy-Guided Surgical Removal of a Microchip from the Spinal Canal of Two Cats
    Mergl, Justin
    Nutt, Laura
    Pareja, Augusto
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ANIMAL HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, 2023, 59 (04) : 193 - 197
  • [50] Fluoroscopy time is not accurate as a surrogate for radiation exposure
    Skripochnik, Edvard
    Loh, Shang A.
    VASCULAR, 2017, 25 (05) : 466 - 471