Brain Parcellation Repeatability and Reproducibility Using Conventional and Quantitative 3D MR Imaging

被引:1
|
作者
Warntjes, J. B. M. [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Lundberg, P. [2 ,3 ]
Tisell, A. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Linkoping Univ, Ctr Med Image Sci & Visualizat, Linkoping, Sweden
[2] Linkoping Univ, Dept Radiat Phys, Linkoping, Sweden
[3] Linkoping Univ, Dept Hlth Med & Caring Sci, Linkoping, Sweden
[4] SyntheticMR, Linkoping, Sweden
[5] Linkoping Univ Hosp, Ctr Med Imaging Sci & Visualisat, S-58185 Linkoping, Sweden
关键词
VOLUMETRY; 3D-QALAS; SOFTWARE;
D O I
10.3174/ajnr.A7937
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Automatic brain parcellation is typically performed on dedicated MR imaging sequences, which require valuable examination time. In this study, a 3D MR imaging quantification sequence to retrieve R-1 and R-2 relaxation rates and proton density maps was used to synthesize a T1-weighted image stack for brain volume measurement, thereby combining image data for multiple purposes. The repeatability and reproducibility of using the conventional and synthetic input data were evaluated.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve subjects with a mean age of 54?years were scanned twice at 1.5T and 3T with 3D-QALAS and a conventionally acquired T1-weighted sequence. Using SyMRI, we converted the R-1, R-2, and proton density maps into synthetic T1-weighted images. Both the conventional T1-weighted and the synthetic 3D-T1-weighted inversion recovery images were processed for brain parcellation by NeuroQuant. Bland-Altman statistics were used to correlate the volumes of 12 brain structures. The coefficient of variation was used to evaluate the repeatability.RESULTS: A high correlation with medians of 0.97 for 1.5T and 0.92 for 3T was found. A high repeatability was shown with a median coefficient of variation of 1.2% for both T1-weighted and synthetic 3D-T1-weighted inversion recovery at 1.5T, and 1.5% for T1-weighted imaging and 4.4% for synthetic 3D-T1-weighted inversion recovery at 3T. However, significant biases were observed between the methods and field strengths.CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to perform MR imaging quantification of R-1, R-2, and proton density maps to synthesize a 3D-T1-weighted image stack, which can be used for automatic brain parcellation. Synthetic parameter settings should be reinvestigated to reduce the observed bias.
引用
收藏
页码:910 / 915
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Assessment of the Perfusion Variation After Radiotherapy for Brain Metastasis Using MR 3D ASL Perfusion Imaging
    Hou, C.
    Gong, G.
    Yin, Y.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (06) : E390 - E390
  • [32] A phantom study evaluating the quantitative aspect of 3D PET imaging of the brain
    Sossi, V
    Oakes, TR
    Ruth, TJ
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1998, 43 (09): : 2615 - 2630
  • [33] Regional characteristics of newly diagnosed grade 3 brain gliomas using MRI, 3D MR spectroscopic imaging, and diffusion tensor imaging
    Isik, Esin Ozturk
    Pirzkall, Andrea
    Chang, Susan M.
    Nelson, Sarah J.
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2006, 8 (04) : 493 - 494
  • [34] Short-term repeatability and long-term reproducibility of quantitative MR imaging biomarkers in a single centre longitudinal study
    Salluzzi, Marina
    McCreary, Cheryl R.
    Gobbi, David G.
    Lauzon, Michel Louis
    Frayne, Richard
    NEUROIMAGE, 2022, 260
  • [35] 3D cephalometric analysis using Magnetic Resonance Imaging: validation of accuracy and reproducibility
    Alexander Juerchott
    Muhammad Abdullah Saleem
    Tim Hilgenfeld
    Christian Freudlsperger
    Sebastian Zingler
    Christopher J. Lux
    Martin Bendszus
    Sabine Heiland
    Scientific Reports, 8
  • [36] 3D cephalometric analysis using Magnetic Resonance Imaging: validation of accuracy and reproducibility
    Juerchott, Alexander
    Saleem, Muhammad Abdullah
    Hilgenfeld, Tim
    Freudlsperger, Christian
    Zingler, Sebastian
    Lux, Christopher J.
    Bendszus, Martin
    Heiland, Sabine
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2018, 8
  • [37] Repeatability and reproducibility of quantitative breast MRI in community imaging centers: Preliminary results
    Sorace, Anna G.
    Virostko, Jack
    Wu, Chengyue
    Jarrett, Angela M.
    Barnes, Stephanie L.
    Luci, Jeffrey
    Patt, Debra A.
    Goodgame, Boone
    Avery, Sarah
    Yankeelov, Thomas E.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2018, 78 (04)
  • [38] Repeatability and Reproducibility of Quantitative Whole-lung Perfusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Ley-Zaporozhan, Julia
    Molinari, Francesco
    Risse, Frank
    Puderbach, Michael
    Schenk, Jens-Peter
    Kopp-Schneider, Annette
    Kauczor, Hans-Ulrich
    Ley, Sebastian
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC IMAGING, 2011, 26 (03) : 230 - 239
  • [39] 3D quantitative phase imaging of neural networks using WDT
    Kim, Taewoo
    Liu, S. Chris
    Iyer, Raj
    Gillette, Martha U.
    Popescu, Gabriel
    QUANTITATIVE PHASE IMAGING, 2015, 9336
  • [40] The 3D Moore-Rayleigh Test for the Quantitative Groupwise Comparison of MR Brain Images
    Scheenstra, Alize E. H.
    Muskulus, Michael
    Staring, Marius
    van den Maagdenberg, Arn M. J. V.
    Lunel, Sjoerd Verduyn
    Reiber, J. Hans C.
    van der Weerd, Louise
    Dijkstra, Jouke
    INFORMATION PROCESSING IN MEDICAL IMAGING, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, 5636 : 564 - +