Brain Parcellation Repeatability and Reproducibility Using Conventional and Quantitative 3D MR Imaging

被引:1
|
作者
Warntjes, J. B. M. [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Lundberg, P. [2 ,3 ]
Tisell, A. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Linkoping Univ, Ctr Med Image Sci & Visualizat, Linkoping, Sweden
[2] Linkoping Univ, Dept Radiat Phys, Linkoping, Sweden
[3] Linkoping Univ, Dept Hlth Med & Caring Sci, Linkoping, Sweden
[4] SyntheticMR, Linkoping, Sweden
[5] Linkoping Univ Hosp, Ctr Med Imaging Sci & Visualisat, S-58185 Linkoping, Sweden
关键词
VOLUMETRY; 3D-QALAS; SOFTWARE;
D O I
10.3174/ajnr.A7937
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Automatic brain parcellation is typically performed on dedicated MR imaging sequences, which require valuable examination time. In this study, a 3D MR imaging quantification sequence to retrieve R-1 and R-2 relaxation rates and proton density maps was used to synthesize a T1-weighted image stack for brain volume measurement, thereby combining image data for multiple purposes. The repeatability and reproducibility of using the conventional and synthetic input data were evaluated.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve subjects with a mean age of 54?years were scanned twice at 1.5T and 3T with 3D-QALAS and a conventionally acquired T1-weighted sequence. Using SyMRI, we converted the R-1, R-2, and proton density maps into synthetic T1-weighted images. Both the conventional T1-weighted and the synthetic 3D-T1-weighted inversion recovery images were processed for brain parcellation by NeuroQuant. Bland-Altman statistics were used to correlate the volumes of 12 brain structures. The coefficient of variation was used to evaluate the repeatability.RESULTS: A high correlation with medians of 0.97 for 1.5T and 0.92 for 3T was found. A high repeatability was shown with a median coefficient of variation of 1.2% for both T1-weighted and synthetic 3D-T1-weighted inversion recovery at 1.5T, and 1.5% for T1-weighted imaging and 4.4% for synthetic 3D-T1-weighted inversion recovery at 3T. However, significant biases were observed between the methods and field strengths.CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to perform MR imaging quantification of R-1, R-2, and proton density maps to synthesize a 3D-T1-weighted image stack, which can be used for automatic brain parcellation. Synthetic parameter settings should be reinvestigated to reduce the observed bias.
引用
收藏
页码:910 / 915
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Reproducibility of 3D 1H MR spectroscopic imaging of the prostate at 1.5T
    Lagemaat, Miriam W.
    Zechmann, Christian M.
    Futterer, Jurgen J.
    Weiland, Elisabeth
    Lu, Jianping
    Villeirs, Geert M.
    Holshouser, Barbara A.
    van Hecke, Paul
    Lemort, Marc
    Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter
    Barentsz, Jelle O.
    Roell, Stefan O.
    Heerschap, Arend
    Scheenen, Tom W. J.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2012, 35 (01) : 166 - 173
  • [22] Determination of 3D cartilage thickness data from MR imaging: Computational method and reproducibility in the living
    Stammberger, T
    Eckstein, F
    Englmeier, KH
    Reiser, M
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1999, 41 (03) : 529 - 536
  • [23] Acetabular inclination and anteversion in infants using 3D MR imaging
    Falliner, A
    Muhle, C
    Brossmann, J
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2002, 43 (02) : 221 - 224
  • [24] Brain Tumor Locating in 3D MR Volume Using Symmetryl
    Dvorak, Pavel
    Bartusek, Karel
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2014: IMAGE PROCESSING, 2014, 9034
  • [25] 3D Visualization of Brain Tumors using MR Images: A Survey
    El-Torky, Dina Mohammed Sherif
    Al-Berry, Maryam Nabil
    Salem, Mohammed Abdel-Megeed
    Roushdy, Mohamed Ismail
    CURRENT MEDICAL IMAGING REVIEWS, 2019, 15 (04) : 353 - 361
  • [26] In Vivo Quantitative Vascular Imaging of Tumors Using 3D Photoacoustic Imaging
    Thornton, M.
    Stantz, K.
    Kruger, R.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 38 (06)
  • [27] NONINVASIVE 3D CHOLANGIOGRAPHY WITH MR IMAGING
    OUTWATER, E
    MILLER, L
    GORDON, S
    MITCHELL, DG
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1993, 104 (04) : A374 - A374
  • [28] Cerebrovascular imaging with 3D MR DSA
    Turski, PA
    Frayne, R
    Carroll, TJ
    Korosec, FR
    Mckinnon, SG
    Grist, TM
    Mistretta, CA
    RIVISTA DI NEURORADIOLOGIA, 1998, 11 : 117 - 120
  • [29] Quantitative comparison of 2D and 3D late gadolinium enhancement MR imaging for cardiomyopathies
    Fabian Morsbach
    Sonja Gordic
    Robert Götti
    Markus Niemann
    Hatem Alkadhi
    Gruner Christiane
    Robert Manka
    Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 16 (Suppl 1)
  • [30] Reproducibility and Repeatability in Focus: Evaluating LVEF Measurements with 3D Echocardiography by Medical Technologists
    Nielsen, Marc Ostergaard
    Ljoki, Arlinda
    Zerahn, Bo
    Jensen, Lars Thorbjorn
    Kristensen, Bent
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2024, 14 (16)