Comparison of the effect of pressure control and volume control ventilation on endotracheal tube cuff pressure in patients undergoing general anesthesia and mechanical ventilation: a parallel randomized clinical trial

被引:1
|
作者
Nasrolahzadeh, Shahram [1 ]
Nourian, Javad [2 ]
Khosravi, Ahmad [3 ]
Ghasempour, Saeed [4 ]
Abbasi, Ali [5 ]
Ebrahimi, Hossein [6 ]
机构
[1] Shahroud Univ Med Sci, Imam Hossein Hosp, Shahroud, Iran
[2] Shahroud Univ Med Sci, Imam Hossein Hosp, Clin Res Dev Unit, Shahroud, Iran
[3] Shahroud Univ Med Sci, Ctr Hlth Related Social & Behav Sci Res, Dept Epidemiol, Shahroud, Iran
[4] Shahroud Univ Med Sci, Student Res Comm, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Shahroud, Iran
[5] Shahroud Univ Med Sci, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Dept Nursing, Shahroud, Iran
[6] Shahroud Univ Med Sci, Ctr Hlth Related Social & Behav Sci Res, Shahroud, Iran
关键词
Volume control ventilation; Pressure control ventilation; Endotracheal tube cuff pressure; Mechanical ventilation; TIDAL VOLUMES; BODY POSITION;
D O I
10.1186/s12871-023-02263-1
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background Endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation are prevalent interventions in the operating room and intensive care unit. Recently, the complications of endotracheal tube cuff pressure have been a topic of interest. Therefore, this study compared the effect of pressure control and volume control ventilation modes on the endotracheal cuff pressure rate in patients undergoing general anesthesia and mechanical ventilation. Methods In this triple-blinded randomized clinical trial, 50 patients undergoing open limb surgery and inguinal hernia were allocated to two groups of 25 based on inclusion criteria. After intubation, one group underwent ventilation on the pressure control ventilation mode, and the other underwent ventilation on the volume control ventilation mode. In both groups, using a manometer, the cuff's pressure was first adjusted in the range of 25-30 cm of water. Then, the cuff pressure was measured at 10, 20, and 30 min intervals. The data were statistically analyzed using independent t-test, and two-way repeated measures ANOVA. Results The present study's findings showed that cuff pressure has significantly decreased over time in both study groups (F = 117.7, P < 0.001). However, a repeated measures ANOVA with a Greenhouse-Geisser correction showed no interaction between time and groups (F = 0.019, P = 0.98). The two groups had no significant difference in cuff pressure (F = 0.56, P = 0.458). Conclusion Since the cuff pressure has been significantly reduced in both groups over time, continuous monitoring of endotracheal tube cuff pressure in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation is essential. Therefore, it is suggested to keep the cuff pressure within the recommended range to prevent complications resulting from cuff pressure reduction, such as aspiration and ventilation decrease. Trial registration The study was registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trial on 23/02/2019 (trial registration number: IRCT20181018041376N1).
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Comparison of Intraoperative Pressure Control and Volume Control Ventilation in Supine and Prone Positions: The Endless Debate
    Asar, Sinan
    Tontu, Furkan
    Eren, Gulay Asik
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF BAKIRKOY, 2021, 17 (04) : 412 - 419
  • [42] CUFF PRESSURE OF ENDOTRACHEAL TUBES AFTER CHANGES IN BODY POSITION IN CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS TREATED WITH MECHANICAL VENTILATION
    Lizy, Christelle
    Swinnen, Walter
    Labeau, Sonia
    Poelaert, Jan
    Vogelaers, Dirk
    Vandewoude, Koenraad
    Dulhunty, Joel
    Blot, Stijn
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2014, 23 (01) : E1 - E8
  • [43] COMPARISON OF PRESSURE SUPPORT VENTILATION AND ASSIST CONTROL VENTILATION IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE RESPIRATORY-FAILURE
    TOKIOKA, H
    SAITO, S
    KOSAKA, F
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 1989, 15 (06) : 364 - 367
  • [44] Effect of continuous measurement and adjustment of endotracheal tube cuff pressure on postoperative sore throat in patients undergoing gynecological laparoscopic surgery: a randomized controlled trial
    Wang, Chen
    Yan, Xiang
    Gao, Chao
    Liu, Simeng
    Bao, Di
    Zhang, Di
    Jiang, Jia
    Wu, Anshi
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MONITORING AND COMPUTING, 2024, 38 (06) : 1379 - 1386
  • [45] Evaluation of the Effect of Pressure-Controlled Ventilation-Volume Guaranteed Mode vs. Volume-Controlled Ventilation Mode on Atelectasis in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
    Turan Civraz, Ayse Zeynep
    Saracoglu, Ayten
    Saracoglu, Kemal Tolga
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2023, 59 (10):
  • [46] Effect of facemask oxygenation with and without positive pressure ventilation on gastric volume during anesthesia induction in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy or partial hepatectomy: a randomized controlled trial
    He, Guangting
    Ma, Liyun
    Tian, Ke
    Cao, Yuqi
    Qin, Zaisheng
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [47] Effect of facemask oxygenation with and without positive pressure ventilation on gastric volume during anesthesia induction in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy or partial hepatectomy: a randomized controlled trial
    Guangting He
    Liyun Ma
    Ke Tian
    Yuqi Cao
    Zaisheng Qin
    BMC Anesthesiology, 22
  • [48] Effect of supraglottic airway devices versus endotracheal intubation general anesthesia on outcomes in patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy A prospective randomized clinical trial
    Zhao, Jing
    Zhu, Wenchao
    Qi, Yingying
    Xu, Guangjun
    Liu, Lei
    Liu, Jingjing
    MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (18) : E29074
  • [49] Changes in tapered endotracheal tube cuff pressure after changing position to hyperextension of neck A randomized clinical trial
    Park, Ji-Hoon
    Lee, Hyo-Jin
    Lee, Sou Hyun
    Kim, Ji Seob
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (29)
  • [50] Tidal volume measurement error in pressure control modes of mechanical ventilation: A model study
    Chatburn, Robert L.
    Mireles-Cabodevila, Eduardo
    Sasidhar, Madhu
    COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2016, 75 : 235 - 242