Comparison of the effect of pressure control and volume control ventilation on endotracheal tube cuff pressure in patients undergoing general anesthesia and mechanical ventilation: a parallel randomized clinical trial

被引:1
|
作者
Nasrolahzadeh, Shahram [1 ]
Nourian, Javad [2 ]
Khosravi, Ahmad [3 ]
Ghasempour, Saeed [4 ]
Abbasi, Ali [5 ]
Ebrahimi, Hossein [6 ]
机构
[1] Shahroud Univ Med Sci, Imam Hossein Hosp, Shahroud, Iran
[2] Shahroud Univ Med Sci, Imam Hossein Hosp, Clin Res Dev Unit, Shahroud, Iran
[3] Shahroud Univ Med Sci, Ctr Hlth Related Social & Behav Sci Res, Dept Epidemiol, Shahroud, Iran
[4] Shahroud Univ Med Sci, Student Res Comm, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Shahroud, Iran
[5] Shahroud Univ Med Sci, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Dept Nursing, Shahroud, Iran
[6] Shahroud Univ Med Sci, Ctr Hlth Related Social & Behav Sci Res, Shahroud, Iran
关键词
Volume control ventilation; Pressure control ventilation; Endotracheal tube cuff pressure; Mechanical ventilation; TIDAL VOLUMES; BODY POSITION;
D O I
10.1186/s12871-023-02263-1
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background Endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation are prevalent interventions in the operating room and intensive care unit. Recently, the complications of endotracheal tube cuff pressure have been a topic of interest. Therefore, this study compared the effect of pressure control and volume control ventilation modes on the endotracheal cuff pressure rate in patients undergoing general anesthesia and mechanical ventilation. Methods In this triple-blinded randomized clinical trial, 50 patients undergoing open limb surgery and inguinal hernia were allocated to two groups of 25 based on inclusion criteria. After intubation, one group underwent ventilation on the pressure control ventilation mode, and the other underwent ventilation on the volume control ventilation mode. In both groups, using a manometer, the cuff's pressure was first adjusted in the range of 25-30 cm of water. Then, the cuff pressure was measured at 10, 20, and 30 min intervals. The data were statistically analyzed using independent t-test, and two-way repeated measures ANOVA. Results The present study's findings showed that cuff pressure has significantly decreased over time in both study groups (F = 117.7, P < 0.001). However, a repeated measures ANOVA with a Greenhouse-Geisser correction showed no interaction between time and groups (F = 0.019, P = 0.98). The two groups had no significant difference in cuff pressure (F = 0.56, P = 0.458). Conclusion Since the cuff pressure has been significantly reduced in both groups over time, continuous monitoring of endotracheal tube cuff pressure in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation is essential. Therefore, it is suggested to keep the cuff pressure within the recommended range to prevent complications resulting from cuff pressure reduction, such as aspiration and ventilation decrease. Trial registration The study was registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trial on 23/02/2019 (trial registration number: IRCT20181018041376N1).
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Automatic control of tracheal tube cuff pressure in ventilated patients in semirecumbent position: A randomized trial
    Valencia, Mauricio
    Ferrer, Miquel
    Farre, Ramon
    Navajas, Daniel
    Ramon Badia, Joan
    Maria Nicolas, Josep
    Torres, Antoni
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2007, 35 (06) : 1543 - 1549
  • [32] Effects of protective mechanical ventilation during general anesthesia in patients undergoing peripheral vascular surgery: A randomized controlled trial
    Schmidt, Andre P.
    Marques, Alice J.
    Reinstein, Amanda R.
    Bevilacqua Filho, Clovis T.
    Carmona, Maria Jose C.
    Auler, Jose Otavio C., Jr.
    Felix, Elaine A.
    Andrade, Cristiano F.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2020, 61
  • [33] Pressure control plus spontaneous ventilation versus volume assist-control ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome. A randomised clinical trial
    Richard, Jean-Christophe M.
    Beloncle, Francois M.
    Beduneau, Gaetan
    Mortaza, Satar
    Ehrmann, Stephan
    Diehl, Jean-Luc
    Prat, Gwenael
    Jaber, Samir
    Rahmani, Hassene
    Reignier, Jean
    Boulain, Thierry
    Yonis, Hodane
    Richecoeur, Jack
    Thille, Arnaud W.
    Declercq, Pierre-Louis
    Antok, Emmanuel
    Carteaux, Guillaume
    Vielle, Bruno
    Brochard, Laurent
    Mercat, Alain
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2024, 50 (10) : 1647 - 1656
  • [34] In vitro evaluation of aerosol bronchodilator delivery during mechanical ventilation: pressure-control vs. volume control ventilation
    Dean R. Hess
    Christine Dillman
    Robert M. Kacmarek
    Intensive Care Medicine, 2003, 29 : 1145 - 1150
  • [35] Vitro evaluation of aerosol bronchodilator delivery during mechanical ventilation: pressure-control vs. volume control ventilation
    Hess, DR
    Dillman, C
    Kacmarek, RM
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2003, 29 (07) : 1145 - 1150
  • [36] THE MILLER TRACHEAL CUFF PRESSURE CONTROL VALVE - CLINICAL USE IN CONTROLLED AND SPONTANEOUS VENTILATION
    PAYNE, KA
    MILLER, DM
    ANAESTHESIA, 1993, 48 (04) : 324 - 327
  • [37] Comparison of limited driving pressure ventilation and low tidal volume strategies in adults with acute respiratory failure on mechanical ventilation: a randomized controlled trial
    Tongyoo, Surat
    Viarasilpa, Tanuwong
    Deawtrakulchai, Phitphiboon
    Subpinyo, Santi
    Suppasilp, Chaiyawat
    Permpikul, Chairat
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN RESPIRATORY DISEASE, 2024, 18
  • [38] Outcomes in Patients with ARDS: A Comparison of Volume Vs Pressure Driven Mechanical Ventilation
    Green, A.
    Gershengorn, H. B.
    Gong, M. N.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2018, 197
  • [39] Randomized crossover trial of volume-controlled versus pressure-limited ventilation - effect on minute ventilation
    Gupta, S.
    Lal, M. K.
    Donn, S. M.
    Sinha, S. K.
    ACTA PAEDIATRICA, 2007, 96 : 24 - 24
  • [40] THE EFFECT OF A GAS LEAK AROUND THE ENDOTRACHEAL-TUBE ON THE MEAN TRACHEAL PRESSURE DURING MECHANICAL VENTILATION
    FONTAN, JJP
    HELDT, GP
    GREGORY, GA
    AMERICAN REVIEW OF RESPIRATORY DISEASE, 1985, 132 (02): : 339 - 342