Comparison of the effect of pressure control and volume control ventilation on endotracheal tube cuff pressure in patients undergoing general anesthesia and mechanical ventilation: a parallel randomized clinical trial

被引:1
|
作者
Nasrolahzadeh, Shahram [1 ]
Nourian, Javad [2 ]
Khosravi, Ahmad [3 ]
Ghasempour, Saeed [4 ]
Abbasi, Ali [5 ]
Ebrahimi, Hossein [6 ]
机构
[1] Shahroud Univ Med Sci, Imam Hossein Hosp, Shahroud, Iran
[2] Shahroud Univ Med Sci, Imam Hossein Hosp, Clin Res Dev Unit, Shahroud, Iran
[3] Shahroud Univ Med Sci, Ctr Hlth Related Social & Behav Sci Res, Dept Epidemiol, Shahroud, Iran
[4] Shahroud Univ Med Sci, Student Res Comm, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Shahroud, Iran
[5] Shahroud Univ Med Sci, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Dept Nursing, Shahroud, Iran
[6] Shahroud Univ Med Sci, Ctr Hlth Related Social & Behav Sci Res, Shahroud, Iran
关键词
Volume control ventilation; Pressure control ventilation; Endotracheal tube cuff pressure; Mechanical ventilation; TIDAL VOLUMES; BODY POSITION;
D O I
10.1186/s12871-023-02263-1
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background Endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation are prevalent interventions in the operating room and intensive care unit. Recently, the complications of endotracheal tube cuff pressure have been a topic of interest. Therefore, this study compared the effect of pressure control and volume control ventilation modes on the endotracheal cuff pressure rate in patients undergoing general anesthesia and mechanical ventilation. Methods In this triple-blinded randomized clinical trial, 50 patients undergoing open limb surgery and inguinal hernia were allocated to two groups of 25 based on inclusion criteria. After intubation, one group underwent ventilation on the pressure control ventilation mode, and the other underwent ventilation on the volume control ventilation mode. In both groups, using a manometer, the cuff's pressure was first adjusted in the range of 25-30 cm of water. Then, the cuff pressure was measured at 10, 20, and 30 min intervals. The data were statistically analyzed using independent t-test, and two-way repeated measures ANOVA. Results The present study's findings showed that cuff pressure has significantly decreased over time in both study groups (F = 117.7, P < 0.001). However, a repeated measures ANOVA with a Greenhouse-Geisser correction showed no interaction between time and groups (F = 0.019, P = 0.98). The two groups had no significant difference in cuff pressure (F = 0.56, P = 0.458). Conclusion Since the cuff pressure has been significantly reduced in both groups over time, continuous monitoring of endotracheal tube cuff pressure in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation is essential. Therefore, it is suggested to keep the cuff pressure within the recommended range to prevent complications resulting from cuff pressure reduction, such as aspiration and ventilation decrease. Trial registration The study was registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trial on 23/02/2019 (trial registration number: IRCT20181018041376N1).
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Intermittent versus continuous control of tracheal cuff pressure in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chen, Qin
    Yu, Xuemei
    Chen, Yidan
    He, Qin
    Zhu, Biyun
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2023, 32 (15-16) : 4283 - 4294
  • [22] A comparison of volume control and pressure-regulated volume control ventilation in acute respiratory failure
    Henrik Guldager
    Soeren L Nielsen
    Peder Carl
    Mogens B Soerensen
    Critical Care, 1 (2):
  • [23] Leakage of fluid through an endotracheal tube cuff during spontaneous and intermittent positive pressure ventilation: An in vitro comparison
    Komai, M.
    Sugiura, T.
    Yoshida, A.
    Aoyama, Y.
    Kobayashi, Y.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2010, 27 (01) : 267 - 267
  • [24] Baska mask vs ProSeal Laryngeal mask on airway seal pressure in cases undergoing general anesthesia by mechanical ventilation: A randomized controlled trial
    Rady Abdalla, Shady
    Mohamed, Ahmed Abdalla
    Roshdy, Marianne Magdy
    Ismail, Maha Mohamed
    Abdelreheem, Ashraf Mohamed
    Bahnas, Walaa Mohamed
    Soliman, Mahmoud Salem
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2023, 39 (01): : 673 - 679
  • [25] A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Ventilation Duration Between Adaptive Support Ventilation and Pressure Assist/Control Ventilation in Medical Patients in the ICU
    Kirakli, Cenk
    Naz, Ilknur
    Ediboglu, Ozlem
    Tatar, Dursun
    Budak, Ahmet
    Tellioglu, Emel
    CHEST, 2015, 147 (06) : 1503 - 1509
  • [26] Comparison of effects of volume-controlled and pressure-controlled mode of ventilation on endotracheal cuff pressure and respiratory mechanics in laparoscopic cholecystectomies: A randomised controlled trial
    Nethra, S. S.
    Nagaraja, Swathi
    Sudheesh, K.
    Duggappa, Devika Rani
    Sanket, Bhargavi
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2020, 64 (10) : 842 - 848
  • [27] Pressure-regulated volume control versus volume control ventilation in severely obstructed patients
    Medina, A.
    Modesto-Alapont, V.
    del Villar Guerra, P.
    Redal, M. R.
    Cambra, A. M.
    Rey, C.
    Perez-Baena, L.
    MEDICINA INTENSIVA, 2016, 40 (04) : 250 - 252
  • [28] EFFECT OF TRACHEAL DILATATION AND RUPTURE ON MECHANICAL VENTILATION USING A LOW-PRESSURE CUFF TUBE
    LUNA, CM
    LEGARRETA, G
    ESTEVA, H
    LAFFAIRE, E
    JOLLY, EC
    CHEST, 1993, 104 (02) : 639 - 640
  • [29] Physiologic Comparison of Airway Pressure Release Ventilation and Low Tidal Volume Ventilation in ARDS A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Zou, Xiaojing
    Zhang, Hongling
    Wu, Yongran
    Li, Ruiting
    Gao, Xuehui
    Wang, Azhen
    Zhao, Xin
    Yang, Xiaobo
    Shu, Huaqing
    Qi, Hong
    Fu, Zhaohui
    Yuan, Shiying
    Ma, Yilei
    Yang, Le
    Shang, You
    Zhao, Zhanqi
    CHEST, 2025, 167 (02) : 453 - 465
  • [30] A randomized crossover comparison of the prone ventilation endotracheal tube versus the traditional endotracheal tube in pediatric patients undergoing prone position surgery
    Zou, Wangyuan
    Zhang, Wenqi
    Li, Xue
    Guo, Qulian
    PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2013, 23 (01) : 98 - 100