Commissioning and clinical implementation of an independent dose calculation system for scanned proton beams

被引:0
|
作者
Dreindl, Ralf [1 ,6 ]
Bolsa-Ferruz, Marta [1 ]
Fayos-Sola, Rosa [1 ,2 ]
Cabal, Fatima Padilla [1 ,3 ]
Scheuchenpflug, Lukas [1 ,4 ]
Elia, Alessio [1 ]
Amico, Antonio [1 ,5 ]
Carlino, Antonio [1 ]
Stock, Markus [1 ]
Grevillot, Loic [1 ]
机构
[1] MedAustron Ion Therapy Ctr, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
[2] Hosp Univ La Princesa, Dept Med Phys & Radiat Protect, Madrid, Spain
[3] Med Univ Vienna, AKH Wien, Dept Radiat Oncol, Div Med Radiat Phys, Vienna, Austria
[4] Univ Vienna, Fac Phys, Dept Isotope Phys, Vienna, Austria
[5] IRCCS, Med Phys Dept, Veneto Inst Oncol IOV, Padua, Italy
[6] MedAustron Ion Therapy Ctr, Marie Curie Str 5, A-2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria
来源
关键词
beam time reduction; clinical implementation; commissioning; independent dose calculation; pencil beam scanning; proton therapy; GAMMA-EVALUATION; THERAPY; VALIDATION; INDEX;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.14328
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PurposeExperimental patient-specific QA (PSQA) is a time and resource-intensive process, with a poor sensitivity in detecting errors. Radiation therapy facilities aim to substitute it by means of independent dose calculation (IDC) in combination with a comprehensive beam delivery QA program. This paper reports on the commissioning of the IDC software tool myQA iON (IBA Dosimetry) for proton therapy and its clinical implementation at the MedAustron Ion Therapy Center.MethodsThe IDC commissioning work included the validation of the beam model, the implementation and validation of clinical CT protocols, and the evaluation of patient treatment data. Dose difference maps, gamma index distributions, and pass rates (GPR) have been reviewed. The performance of the IDC tool has been assessed and clinical workflows, simulation settings, and GPR tolerances have been defined.ResultsBeam model validation showed agreement of ranges within +/- 0.2 mm, Bragg-Peak widths within +/- 0.1 mm, and spot sizes at various air gaps within +/- 5% compared to physical measurements. Simulated dose in 2D reference fields deviated by -0.3% +/- 0.5%, while 3D dose distributions differed by 1.8% on average to measurements. Validation of the CT calibration resulted in systematic differences of 2.0% between IDC and experimental data for tissue like samples. GPRs of 99.4 +/- 0.6% were found for head, head and neck, and pediatric CT protocols on a 2%/2 mm gamma criterion. GPRs for the adult abdomen protocol were at 98.9% on average with 3%/3 mm. Root causes of GPR outliers, for example, implants were identified and evaluated.ConclusionIDC has been successfully commissioned and integrated into the MedAustron clinical workflow for protons in 2021. IDC has been stepwise and safely substituting experimental PSQA since February 2021. The initial reduction of proton experimental PSQA was about 25% and reached up to 90% after 1 year.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Maximizing the biological effect of proton dose delivered with scanned beams via inhomogeneous daily dose distributions
    Zeng, Chuan
    Giantsoudi, Drosoula
    Grassberger, Clemens
    Goldberg, Saveli
    Niemierko, Andrzej
    Paganetti, Harald
    Efstathiou, Jason A.
    Trofimov, Alexei
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (05)
  • [22] Clinical Implementation of Automatic Proton Secondary Dose Calculation Workflow with Monte Carlo Simulations
    Lee-Poprocki, H.
    Faught, A. M.
    Lee, E.
    Batin, E.
    Ayan, A. S.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 51 (10) : 7735 - 7735
  • [23] Implementation of Sphinx/Lynx as daily QA equipment for scanned proton and carbon ion beams
    Grevillot, Loic
    Moreno, Jhonnatan Osorio
    Fuchs, Hermann
    Dreindl, Ralf
    Elia, Alessio
    Bolsa-Ferruz, Marta
    Stock, Markus
    Palmans, Hugo
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 24 (04):
  • [24] Dose Perturbation Studies Due to Prostate Seed Implants in Proton Uniform Scanned Beams
    Nazaryan, V.
    DiGennaro, J.
    Shahnazi, K.
    Keppel, C.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 38 (06)
  • [25] Clinical Commissioning of the Pinnacle Proton Dose Engine for the Mevion S250 Delivery System
    Willoughby, T.
    Zeidan, O.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (06)
  • [26] Simplified Monte Carlo dose calculation for therapeutic proton beams
    Kohno, R
    Sakae, T
    Takada, Y
    Matsumoto, K
    Matsuda, H
    Nohtomi, A
    Terunuma, T
    Tsunashima, Y
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS PART 2-LETTERS, 2002, 41 (3A): : L294 - L297
  • [27] Clinical implementation and validation of a commercial Monte Carlo dose calculation system
    Chuang, C
    Curran, B
    Verhey, L
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (06) : 1453 - 1453
  • [28] Experimental Validation of a 4D Dose Calculation for Scanned Proton Beam Therapy
    Krieger, M.
    Klimpki, G.
    Fattori, G.
    Hrbacek, J.
    Oxley, D.
    Safai, S.
    Weber, D.
    Lomax, A.
    Zhang, Y.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (06) : 3180 - 3180
  • [29] Application of Monte Carlo Simulation for Treatment Planning System Commissioning and Dose Calculation for a Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy System
    Hu, H.
    Liu, H.
    Jia, Y.
    Zheng, Y.
    Ding, S.
    Wang, B.
    Li, Y.
    Huang, X.
    Li, Z.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (06) : E860 - E860
  • [30] Monte Carlo-based parametrization of the lateral dose spread for clinical treatment planning of scanned proton and carbon ion beams
    Parodi, Katia
    Mairani, Andrea
    Sommerer, Florian
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2013, 54 : 91 - 96