Commissioning and clinical implementation of an independent dose calculation system for scanned proton beams

被引:0
|
作者
Dreindl, Ralf [1 ,6 ]
Bolsa-Ferruz, Marta [1 ]
Fayos-Sola, Rosa [1 ,2 ]
Cabal, Fatima Padilla [1 ,3 ]
Scheuchenpflug, Lukas [1 ,4 ]
Elia, Alessio [1 ]
Amico, Antonio [1 ,5 ]
Carlino, Antonio [1 ]
Stock, Markus [1 ]
Grevillot, Loic [1 ]
机构
[1] MedAustron Ion Therapy Ctr, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
[2] Hosp Univ La Princesa, Dept Med Phys & Radiat Protect, Madrid, Spain
[3] Med Univ Vienna, AKH Wien, Dept Radiat Oncol, Div Med Radiat Phys, Vienna, Austria
[4] Univ Vienna, Fac Phys, Dept Isotope Phys, Vienna, Austria
[5] IRCCS, Med Phys Dept, Veneto Inst Oncol IOV, Padua, Italy
[6] MedAustron Ion Therapy Ctr, Marie Curie Str 5, A-2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria
来源
关键词
beam time reduction; clinical implementation; commissioning; independent dose calculation; pencil beam scanning; proton therapy; GAMMA-EVALUATION; THERAPY; VALIDATION; INDEX;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.14328
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PurposeExperimental patient-specific QA (PSQA) is a time and resource-intensive process, with a poor sensitivity in detecting errors. Radiation therapy facilities aim to substitute it by means of independent dose calculation (IDC) in combination with a comprehensive beam delivery QA program. This paper reports on the commissioning of the IDC software tool myQA iON (IBA Dosimetry) for proton therapy and its clinical implementation at the MedAustron Ion Therapy Center.MethodsThe IDC commissioning work included the validation of the beam model, the implementation and validation of clinical CT protocols, and the evaluation of patient treatment data. Dose difference maps, gamma index distributions, and pass rates (GPR) have been reviewed. The performance of the IDC tool has been assessed and clinical workflows, simulation settings, and GPR tolerances have been defined.ResultsBeam model validation showed agreement of ranges within +/- 0.2 mm, Bragg-Peak widths within +/- 0.1 mm, and spot sizes at various air gaps within +/- 5% compared to physical measurements. Simulated dose in 2D reference fields deviated by -0.3% +/- 0.5%, while 3D dose distributions differed by 1.8% on average to measurements. Validation of the CT calibration resulted in systematic differences of 2.0% between IDC and experimental data for tissue like samples. GPRs of 99.4 +/- 0.6% were found for head, head and neck, and pediatric CT protocols on a 2%/2 mm gamma criterion. GPRs for the adult abdomen protocol were at 98.9% on average with 3%/3 mm. Root causes of GPR outliers, for example, implants were identified and evaluated.ConclusionIDC has been successfully commissioned and integrated into the MedAustron clinical workflow for protons in 2021. IDC has been stepwise and safely substituting experimental PSQA since February 2021. The initial reduction of proton experimental PSQA was about 25% and reached up to 90% after 1 year.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Implementation and validation of a software for imrt and vmat independent dose calculation
    Vallet, V.
    Bochud, F.
    Bourhis, J.
    Moeckli, R.
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2015, 191 (01) : 103 - 103
  • [42] Clinical commissioning a synchrotron-based proton therapy system
    Azcona, J. D.
    Aguilar, B.
    Irazola, L.
    Vinals, A.
    Cabello, P.
    Zucca, D.
    Perales, A.
    Polo, R.
    Delgado, J. M.
    Burguete, J.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2021, 161 : S1422 - S1423
  • [43] Commissioning of pencil beam and Monte Carlo dose engines for non-isocentric treatments in scanned proton beam therapy
    Carlino, A.
    Boehlen, T.
    Vatnitsky, S.
    Grevillot, L.
    Osorio, J.
    Dreindl, R.
    Palmans, H.
    Stock, M.
    Kragl, G.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2019, 64 (17):
  • [44] A general beam model for scanned proton beams, applied to the scanning system at the The Svedberg laboratory
    Traneus, E
    Kimstrand, A
    Ahnesjö, A
    Tilly, N
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2005, 76 : S63 - S63
  • [45] Fast dose analysis of movement effects during treatments with scanned proton and carbon-ion beams
    Vignati, A.
    Anvar, M. Varasteh
    Giordanengo, S.
    Monaco, V.
    Attili, A.
    Donetti, M.
    Marchetto, F.
    Milian, F. Mas
    Ciocca, M.
    Russo, G.
    Sacchi, R.
    Cirio, R.
    MICRO-MINI & NANO-DOSIMETRY & INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES IN RADIATION THERAPY (MMND&ITRO2016), 2017, 777
  • [46] Clinical Commissioning of An In-Vivo Range Verification System for Prostate Cancer Treatment with Anterior and Anterior Oblique Proton Beams
    Hoesl, M.
    Deepak, S.
    Moteabbed, M.
    Park, Y.
    Orbain, J.
    Bentefour, E.
    Lu, H.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (06) : 3726 - 3726
  • [47] An Independent Dose Calculation Engine for Proton PBS Patient Specific QA
    Lee, C.
    Chiang, B.
    Huang, H.
    Chao, T.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (06)
  • [48] An independent platform dose calculation and log file evaluation in proton therapy
    Fonseca, G.
    Almeida, I.
    Wagenberg, T.
    Wolfs, C.
    Freixas, G. Vilches
    Rinaldi, I.
    Martens, J.
    Bosmans, G.
    Verhaegen, F.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2020, 152 : S124 - S124
  • [49] Measurement of Absorbed Dose Due to Secondary Radiation Produced by Passively Scattered and Uniformly Scanned Proton Beams
    Diffenderfer, E.
    McDonough, J.
    Maughan, R.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (06)
  • [50] Calculation and experimental verification of the RBE-weighted dose for scanned ion beams in the presence of target motion
    Gemmel, A.
    Rietzel, E.
    Kraft, G.
    Durante, M.
    Bert, C.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2011, 56 (23): : 7337 - 7351