Commissioning and clinical implementation of an independent dose calculation system for scanned proton beams

被引:0
|
作者
Dreindl, Ralf [1 ,6 ]
Bolsa-Ferruz, Marta [1 ]
Fayos-Sola, Rosa [1 ,2 ]
Cabal, Fatima Padilla [1 ,3 ]
Scheuchenpflug, Lukas [1 ,4 ]
Elia, Alessio [1 ]
Amico, Antonio [1 ,5 ]
Carlino, Antonio [1 ]
Stock, Markus [1 ]
Grevillot, Loic [1 ]
机构
[1] MedAustron Ion Therapy Ctr, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
[2] Hosp Univ La Princesa, Dept Med Phys & Radiat Protect, Madrid, Spain
[3] Med Univ Vienna, AKH Wien, Dept Radiat Oncol, Div Med Radiat Phys, Vienna, Austria
[4] Univ Vienna, Fac Phys, Dept Isotope Phys, Vienna, Austria
[5] IRCCS, Med Phys Dept, Veneto Inst Oncol IOV, Padua, Italy
[6] MedAustron Ion Therapy Ctr, Marie Curie Str 5, A-2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria
来源
关键词
beam time reduction; clinical implementation; commissioning; independent dose calculation; pencil beam scanning; proton therapy; GAMMA-EVALUATION; THERAPY; VALIDATION; INDEX;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.14328
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PurposeExperimental patient-specific QA (PSQA) is a time and resource-intensive process, with a poor sensitivity in detecting errors. Radiation therapy facilities aim to substitute it by means of independent dose calculation (IDC) in combination with a comprehensive beam delivery QA program. This paper reports on the commissioning of the IDC software tool myQA iON (IBA Dosimetry) for proton therapy and its clinical implementation at the MedAustron Ion Therapy Center.MethodsThe IDC commissioning work included the validation of the beam model, the implementation and validation of clinical CT protocols, and the evaluation of patient treatment data. Dose difference maps, gamma index distributions, and pass rates (GPR) have been reviewed. The performance of the IDC tool has been assessed and clinical workflows, simulation settings, and GPR tolerances have been defined.ResultsBeam model validation showed agreement of ranges within +/- 0.2 mm, Bragg-Peak widths within +/- 0.1 mm, and spot sizes at various air gaps within +/- 5% compared to physical measurements. Simulated dose in 2D reference fields deviated by -0.3% +/- 0.5%, while 3D dose distributions differed by 1.8% on average to measurements. Validation of the CT calibration resulted in systematic differences of 2.0% between IDC and experimental data for tissue like samples. GPRs of 99.4 +/- 0.6% were found for head, head and neck, and pediatric CT protocols on a 2%/2 mm gamma criterion. GPRs for the adult abdomen protocol were at 98.9% on average with 3%/3 mm. Root causes of GPR outliers, for example, implants were identified and evaluated.ConclusionIDC has been successfully commissioned and integrated into the MedAustron clinical workflow for protons in 2021. IDC has been stepwise and safely substituting experimental PSQA since February 2021. The initial reduction of proton experimental PSQA was about 25% and reached up to 90% after 1 year.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Monte Carlo investigation of the low-dose envelope from scanned proton pencil beams
    Sawakuchi, Gabriel O.
    Titt, Uwe
    Mirkovic, Dragan
    Ciangaru, George
    Zhu, X. Ronald
    Sahoo, Narayan
    Gillin, Michael T.
    Mohan, Radhe
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2010, 55 (03): : 711 - 721
  • [32] Clinical commissioning of an in vivo range verification system for prostate cancer treatment with anterior and anterior oblique proton beams
    Hoesl, M.
    Deepak, S.
    Moteabbed, M.
    Jassens, G.
    Orban, J.
    Park, Y. K.
    Parodi, K.
    Bentefour, E. H.
    Lu, H. M.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2016, 61 (08): : 3049 - 3062
  • [33] Output Factor Measurements and Aperture Size Dependence of Dose Distributions for Scanned Proton Beams at MPRI
    Wolanski, M.
    Pack, D.
    Jesseph, R.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (06)
  • [34] Collimation of spot scanned proton therapy beams to sharpen the lateral edge of uniform dose volumes
    Charlwood, F. C.
    Aitkenhead, A. H.
    MacKay, R. I.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2014, 111 : S105 - S105
  • [35] AAPM TG-157: Commercial Implementation of Source Modeling and Beam Commissioning for Clinical Monte Carlo Dose Calculation
    Faddegon, B.
    Ma, C.
    Chetty, I.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (06) : 3941 - 3941
  • [36] Initial clinical experience with scanned proton beams at the Italian National Center for Hadrontherapy (CNAO)
    Tuan, J.
    Vischioni, B.
    Fossati, P.
    Srivastava, A.
    Vitolo, V.
    Iannalfi, A.
    Fiore, M. R.
    Krengli, M.
    Mizoe, J. E.
    Orecchia, R.
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2013, 54 : 31 - 42
  • [37] An empirical model for calculation of the collimator contamination dose in therapeutic proton beams
    Vidal, M.
    De Marzi, L.
    Szymanowski, H.
    Guinement, L.
    Nauraye, C.
    Hierso, E.
    Freud, N.
    Ferrand, R.
    Francois, P.
    Sarrut, D.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2016, 61 (04): : 1532 - 1545
  • [38] Analytical Modeling and Dose Calculation Method for Asymmetric Proton Pencil Beams
    Gelover, E.
    Wang, D.
    Hill, P.
    Flynn, R.
    Hyer, D.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (06) : 550 - 550
  • [39] Clinical implementation of a Monte Carlo based independent TPS dose checking system
    Livingstone, A. G.
    Crowe, S. B.
    Sylvander, S.
    Kairn, T.
    PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES IN MEDICINE, 2020, 43 (03) : 1113 - 1123
  • [40] Clinical implementation of a Monte Carlo based independent TPS dose checking system
    A. G. Livingstone
    S. B. Crowe
    S. Sylvander
    T. Kairn
    Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine, 2020, 43 : 1113 - 1123