Improved image quality and dose reduction in abdominal CT with deep-learning reconstruction algorithm: a phantom study

被引:18
|
作者
Greffier, Joel [1 ]
Durand, Quentin [1 ]
Frandon, Julien [1 ]
Si-Mohamed, Salim [2 ,3 ]
Loisy, Maeliss [1 ]
de Oliveira, Fabien [1 ]
Beregi, Jean-Paul [1 ]
Dabli, Djamel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montpellier, Dept Med Imaging, Nimes Med Imaging Grp, CHU Nimes,EA 2992, Bd Prof Robert Debre, F-30029 Montpellier 9, France
[2] Univ Lyon, Univ Claude Bernard Lyon 1, UJM St Etienne, INSA Lyon,CNRS,Inserm,CREATIS UMR 5220,U1206, 7 Ave Jean Capelle O, F-69621 Villeurbanne, France
[3] Hosp Civils Lyon, Louis Pradel Hosp, Dept Radiol, 59 Blvd Pinel, F-69500 Bron, France
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Deep learning; Multidetector computed tomography; Image enhancement; Image processing; computer-assisted; ITERATIVE RECONSTRUCTION; TEXTURE; CHEST;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-022-09003-y
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives To assess the impact of a new artificial intelligence deep-learning reconstruction (Precise Image; AI-DLR) algorithm on image quality against a hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithm in abdominal CT for different clinical indications. Methods Acquisitions on phantoms were performed at 5 dose levels (CTDIvol: 13/11/9/6/1.8 mGy). Raw data were reconstructed using level 4 of iDose(4) (i4) and 3 levels of AI-DLR (Smoother/Smooth/Standard). Noise power spectrum (NPS), task-based transfer function (TTF) and detectability index (d ') were computed: d ' modelled detection of a liver metastasis (LM) and hepatocellular carcinoma at portal (HCCp) and arterial (HCCa) phases. Image quality was subjectively assessed on an anthropomorphic phantom by 2 radiologists. Results From Standard to Smoother levels, noise magnitude and average NPS spatial frequency decreased and the detectability (d ') of all simulated lesions increased. For both inserts, TTF values were similar for all three AI-DLR levels from 13 to 6 mGy but decreased from Standard to Smoother levels at 1.8 mGy. Compared to the i4 used in clinical practice, d ' values were higher using the Smoother and Smooth levels and close for the Standard level. For all dose levels, except at 1.8 mGy, radiologists considered images satisfactory for clinical use for the 3 levels of AI-DLR, but rated images too smooth using the Smoother level. Conclusion Use of the Smooth and Smoother levels of AI-DLR reduces the image noise and improves the detectability of lesions and spatial resolution for standard and low-dose levels. Using the Smooth level is apparently the best compromise between the lowest dose level and adequate image quality.
引用
收藏
页码:699 / 710
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] First Results of a New Deep Learning Reconstruction Algorithm on Image Quality and Liver Metastasis Conspicuity for Abdominal Low-Dose CT
    Greffier, Joel
    Durand, Quentin
    Serrand, Chris
    Sales, Renaud
    de Oliveira, Fabien
    Beregi, Jean-Paul
    Dabli, Djamel
    Frandon, Julien
    [J]. DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 13 (06)
  • [32] Improving image quality of the middle ear with ultra-high-resolution CT coupled with deep-learning image reconstruction algorithm
    Greffier, Joel
    Soyer, Philippe
    Dabli, Djamel
    [J]. DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL IMAGING, 2024, 105 (06) : 211 - 212
  • [33] Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm for Abdominal Multidetector CT at Different Tube Voltages: Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy, Image Quality, and Radiation Dose in a Phantom Study
    Schindera, Sebastian T.
    Diedrichsen, Lars
    Mueller, Hubert C.
    Rusch, Oliver
    Marin, Daniele
    Schmidt, Bernhard
    Raupach, Rainer
    Vock, Peter
    Szucs-Farkas, Zsolt
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2011, 260 (02) : 454 - 462
  • [34] A Liver Phantom Study: CT Radiation Dose Reduction and Different Image Reconstruction Algorithms Affect Diagnostic Quality
    Braenne, Kristina Ragnhild
    Flinder, Liv Ingrid
    Martiniussen, Marit Almenning
    Jensen, Kristin
    Reisse, Claudius Henrich
    Julsrud, Lars
    Martinsen, Anne Catrine
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2016, 40 (05) : 735 - 739
  • [35] Dose reduction potential of a vendor-agnostic deep learning CT reconstruction algorithm: an exploratory study of image quality in assessing small renal masses
    Borgbjerg, J.
    Leland-try, M.
    Kathir, A.
    Longum, A.
    Bomer, J.
    Nasser, S.
    Nielsen, T. K.
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 58 : 28 - 28
  • [36] Evaluation of deep-learning image reconstruction for chest CT examinations at two different dose levels
    Svalkvist, Angelica
    Fagman, Erika
    Vikgren, Jenny
    Ku, Sara
    Diniz, Micael Oliveira
    Norrlund, Rauni Rossi
    Johnsson, Ase A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 24 (03):
  • [37] FEASIBILITY OF RADIATION DOSE REDUCTION FOR CORONARY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY WITH DEEP-LEARNING IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION
    Benz, Dominik C.
    Mojon, Francois
    Kaufmann, Philipp A.
    Buechel, Ronny R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 79 (09) : 1252 - 1252
  • [38] ?Image quality evaluation of the Precise image CT deep learning reconstruction algorithm compared to Filtered Back-projection and iDose4: a phantom study at different dose levels?
    Barca, Patrizio
    Domenichelli, Sara
    Golfieri, Rita
    Pierotti, Luisa
    Spagnoli, Lorenzo
    Tomasi, Silvia
    Strigari, Lidia
    [J]. PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 106
  • [39] Image Quality Improvement of Low-dose Abdominal CT using Deep Learning Image Reconstruction Compared with the Second Generation Iterative Reconstruction
    Kang, Hyo-Jin
    Lee, Jeong Min
    Park, Sae Jin
    Lee, Sang Min
    Joo, Ijin
    Yoon, Jeong Hee
    [J]. CURRENT MEDICAL IMAGING, 2024, 20
  • [40] Diagnostic performance and image quality of deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) on unenhanced low-dose abdominal CT for urolithiasis
    Delabie, Aurelien
    Bouzerar, Roger
    Pichois, Raphael
    Desdoit, Xavier
    Vial, Jeremie
    Renard, Cedric
    [J]. ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2022, 63 (09) : 1283 - 1292