Who benefits from corruption; the private individual or the public purse?

被引:1
|
作者
Tawiah, Vincent [1 ]
Zakari, Abdulrasheed [2 ,3 ]
Xede, James [4 ]
机构
[1] Dublin City Univ, DCU Business Sch, Anticorrupt Res Ctr ARC, Dublin, Ireland
[2] Beijing Inst Technol, Sch Management & Econ, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Alma Mater Europaea ECM, Maribor, Slovenia
[4] Xiamen Univ, Inst Financial & Accounting Studies, Xiamen, Peoples R China
关键词
corruption; institutional quality; private individual; public purse; wealth accumulation; PANEL; INVESTMENT; INEQUALITY; GROWTH; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1002/ijfe.2570
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
In this paper, we examine the impact of corruption on wealth distribution between the public purse and private individuals conditioned on the institutional quality of a country. We used panel data on 83 countries from 2000 to 2017. Our results indicate that corruption helps private individuals to accumulate more wealth at the expense of the public purse in countries with low-quality institutions. However, corruption increases the wealth in the public purse in countries with high-quality institutions. Our results, therefore, imply that the institutional quality of a country significantly shapes how corruption affects the wealth of private individuals and the public purse. The results are pronounced in developing countries and robust to alternative measurements and endogeneity test.
引用
收藏
页码:2900 / 2914
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] The role of costs, benefits, and moral judgments in private-to-private corruption
    Jaakson, Krista
    Johannsen, Lars
    Pedersen, Karin Hilmer
    Vadi, Maaja
    Ashyrov, Gaygysyz
    Reino, Anne
    Soot, Mari-Liis
    CRIME LAW AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2019, 71 (01) : 83 - 106
  • [12] The role of costs, benefits, and moral judgments in private-to-private corruption
    Krista Jaakson
    Lars Johannsen
    Karin Hilmer Pedersen
    Maaja Vadi
    Gaygysyz Ashyrov
    Anne Reino
    Mari-Liis Sööt
    Crime, Law and Social Change, 2019, 71 : 83 - 106
  • [13] WHO BENEFITS FROM PUBLIC INFORMATION PROGRAM
    DOLINSKY, HB
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1982, 40 (02) : 67 - &
  • [14] WHO BENEFITS FROM PUBLIC-EXPENDITURE
    LEGRAND, J
    NEW SOCIETY, 1978, 45 (833): : 614 - 616
  • [15] Public-private joint ventures for high volume retailers: Who benefits?
    Kotin, A
    Peiser, R
    URBAN STUDIES, 1997, 34 (12) : 1971 - 1986
  • [16] Biobank research: who benefits from individual consent?
    Forsberg, Joanna Stjernschantz
    Hansson, Mats G.
    Eriksson, Stefan
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 343
  • [17] 'PUBLIC VICES, PRIVATE BENEFITS'
    CAMERON, JM
    TLS-THE TIMES LITERARY SUPPLEMENT, 1978, (3956): : 64 - 64
  • [18] PRIVATE VICES - PUBLIC BENEFITS
    PREU, JA
    ENGLISH JOURNAL, 1963, 52 (09): : 653 - &
  • [19] Public vices, private virtues: Corruption in Mexico
    Brunk, S
    HISPANIC AMERICAN HISTORICAL REVIEW, 2002, 82 (01) : 173 - 175
  • [20] Public Sector Corruption and Trust in the Private Sector
    Gillanders, Robert
    Neselevska, Olga
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 30 (08) : 1288 - 1317