Who benefits from corruption; the private individual or the public purse?
被引:1
|
作者:
Tawiah, Vincent
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Dublin City Univ, DCU Business Sch, Anticorrupt Res Ctr ARC, Dublin, IrelandDublin City Univ, DCU Business Sch, Anticorrupt Res Ctr ARC, Dublin, Ireland
Tawiah, Vincent
[1
]
Zakari, Abdulrasheed
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Beijing Inst Technol, Sch Management & Econ, Beijing, Peoples R China
Alma Mater Europaea ECM, Maribor, SloveniaDublin City Univ, DCU Business Sch, Anticorrupt Res Ctr ARC, Dublin, Ireland
Zakari, Abdulrasheed
[2
,3
]
论文数: 引用数:
h-index:
机构:
Xede, James
[4
]
机构:
[1] Dublin City Univ, DCU Business Sch, Anticorrupt Res Ctr ARC, Dublin, Ireland
[2] Beijing Inst Technol, Sch Management & Econ, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Alma Mater Europaea ECM, Maribor, Slovenia
[4] Xiamen Univ, Inst Financial & Accounting Studies, Xiamen, Peoples R China
In this paper, we examine the impact of corruption on wealth distribution between the public purse and private individuals conditioned on the institutional quality of a country. We used panel data on 83 countries from 2000 to 2017. Our results indicate that corruption helps private individuals to accumulate more wealth at the expense of the public purse in countries with low-quality institutions. However, corruption increases the wealth in the public purse in countries with high-quality institutions. Our results, therefore, imply that the institutional quality of a country significantly shapes how corruption affects the wealth of private individuals and the public purse. The results are pronounced in developing countries and robust to alternative measurements and endogeneity test.
机构:
Calif State Univ San Bernardino, Coll Business & Publ Adm, San Bernardino, CA 92407 USACalif State Univ San Bernardino, Coll Business & Publ Adm, San Bernardino, CA 92407 USA