Who benefits from corruption; the private individual or the public purse?

被引:1
|
作者
Tawiah, Vincent [1 ]
Zakari, Abdulrasheed [2 ,3 ]
Xede, James [4 ]
机构
[1] Dublin City Univ, DCU Business Sch, Anticorrupt Res Ctr ARC, Dublin, Ireland
[2] Beijing Inst Technol, Sch Management & Econ, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Alma Mater Europaea ECM, Maribor, Slovenia
[4] Xiamen Univ, Inst Financial & Accounting Studies, Xiamen, Peoples R China
关键词
corruption; institutional quality; private individual; public purse; wealth accumulation; PANEL; INVESTMENT; INEQUALITY; GROWTH; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1002/ijfe.2570
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
In this paper, we examine the impact of corruption on wealth distribution between the public purse and private individuals conditioned on the institutional quality of a country. We used panel data on 83 countries from 2000 to 2017. Our results indicate that corruption helps private individuals to accumulate more wealth at the expense of the public purse in countries with low-quality institutions. However, corruption increases the wealth in the public purse in countries with high-quality institutions. Our results, therefore, imply that the institutional quality of a country significantly shapes how corruption affects the wealth of private individuals and the public purse. The results are pronounced in developing countries and robust to alternative measurements and endogeneity test.
引用
收藏
页码:2900 / 2914
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Private Finance Initiative - a good deal for the public purse or a drain on future generations?
    Ball, R
    Heafey, M
    King, D
    POLICY AND POLITICS, 2001, 29 (01): : 95 - 108
  • [42] Dynamic Models for Coordinating Private and Public Interests in Economic Corruption
    G. A. Ugol’nitskii
    A. B. Usov
    Journal of Computer and Systems Sciences International, 2020, 59 : 39 - 48
  • [43] CORRUPTION RISKS IN DEVELOPMENT OF PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP IN RUSSIA
    Roy, Oleg M.
    AKTUAL'NYYE VOPROSY NAUCHNOGO OBESPECHENIYA GOSUDARSTVENNOY POLITIKI ROSSIYSKOY FEDERATSII V BOR'BE S KORRUPTSIYEY, 2014, : 295 - 302
  • [44] PUBLIC DECISIONS, PRIVATE PROFITS. THEORETICAL CONSIDERATIONS ON CORRUPTION
    Artavia Araya, Fernando
    REVISTA DE CIENCIAS SOCIALES-COSTA RICA, 2008, (119): : 13 - 26
  • [45] Public Private Partnership Benefits in Delivering Public Facilities in Malaysia
    Sapri, M.
    Hariati, A. H.
    Ting, Sheau L.
    Sipan, I.
    4TH INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CONTROL CONFERENCE 2016 (IBCC 2016), 2016, 66
  • [46] Public school benefits of private school vouchers
    Rees, NS
    POLICY REVIEW, 1999, (93) : 16 - 19
  • [47] Corruption and Organizational Challenges in a world of Public-Private Partnerships
    Sandoval Ballesteros, Irma Erendira
    GESTION Y POLITICA PUBLICA, 2016, 25 (02): : 365 - +
  • [48] COMPARING EMPLOYEE BENEFITS IN THE PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTORS
    WIATROWSKI, WJ
    MONTHLY LABOR REVIEW, 1988, 111 (12) : 3 - 8
  • [49] Public and Private Benefits in Urban Development Agreements
    Oppio, Alessandra
    Torrieri, Francesca
    SMART AND SUSTAINABLE PLANNING FOR CITIES AND REGIONS, SSPCR 2017, 2018, : 345 - 356
  • [50] Public and private benefits in the 'new' higher education
    Temple, Paul
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATION POLICY, 2007, 22 (02) : 261 - 267