Influence of Triple-Negative versus Luminal A Breast Cancer Subtype on Choice of Autologous versus Implant-Based Delayed-Immediate Breast Reconstruction

被引:4
|
作者
Dickey, Ryan M. [1 ]
Amaya, Joshua [1 ]
Teotia, Sumeet S. [1 ]
Haddock, Nicholas T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr Dallas, Dept Plast Surg, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
关键词
breast reconstruction; luminal A; triple negative; POSTMASTECTOMY RADIOTHERAPY; TISSUE EXPANDER; PROSTHETIC RECONSTRUCTION; RADIATION; OUTCOMES; SURVIVAL; THERAPY; IMPACT; TIME;
D O I
10.1055/s-0041-1736319
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Triple-negative (TN) and luminal A breast cancer molecular subtypes have divergent clinical and prognostic characteristics for breast cancer patients. Our study aims to compare the reconstructive choice of these two groups from the time they receive a tissue expander (TE) to the time they complete autologous or implant-based breast reconstruction. Methods A total of 255 patients who underwent delayed-immediate breast reconstruction with TE placement from 2013 to 2017 diagnosed with either TN ( n =73) or luminal A ( n =182) invasive breast cancer subtype seen by two surgeons at a single institution were identified. Preference of autologous and implant-based reconstruction was analyzed, along with TE complications, race, age, body mass index (BMI), smoking, adjuvant therapy, and comorbidities. Results There was a significant difference in the choice of implant- or autologous-based reconstruction among these two groups ( p <0.05). A greater proportion of luminal A patients underwent implant-based reconstruction (63.47%) and a greater proportion of TN patients underwent autologous-based reconstruction (53.13%). With regard to TE outcomes, there was no significant difference between the two groups with regard to duration of TE placement by reconstructive type or TE surgical complications. Significantly, more TN patients underwent radiation therapy ( p <0.01) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy ( p <0.0001) than luminal A patients. BMI, comorbidities, radiation therapy, and overall TE complications were identified as predictive factors of patients electing for autologous reconstruction over implants. Conclusion TN breast cancer patients mostly chose autologous-based reconstruction, while luminal A patients chose implant-based reconstruction. Both patient groups carried their TEs for similar duration with similar complication profile. Radiation therapy is likely a major factor in the decision for the type of delayed-immediate reconstruction among this population.
引用
收藏
页码:264 / 271
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Influence of triple-negative versus Luminal A breast cancer subtype on choice of autologous versus implant based delayed-immediate breast reconstruction
    Amaya, Joshua
    Dickey, Ryan M.
    Jones, Kaitlin
    Teotia, Sumeet S.
    Haddock, Nicholas T.
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2022, 31 (01)
  • [2] Delayed versus Delayed-Immediate Autologous Breast Reconstruction: A Blinded Evaluation of Aesthetic Outcomes
    Albino, Frank P.
    Patel, Ketan M.
    Smith, Jesse R.
    Nahabedian, Maurice Y.
    ARCHIVES OF PLASTIC SURGERY-APS, 2014, 41 (03): : 264 - 270
  • [3] Revision Rates in Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Delayed-Immediate Autologous Breast Reconstruction
    Patel, Ashraf A.
    Cemaj, Sophie L.
    Martin, Shanique A.
    Cheesborough, Jennifer E.
    Lee, Gordon K.
    Nazerali, Rahim S.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2021, 86 (5S) : S409 - S413
  • [4] Locally Advanced Breast Cancer: Autologous Versus Implant-based Reconstruction
    Tanos, Grigorios
    Prousskaia, Elena
    Chow, Whitney
    Angelaki, Anna
    Cirwan, Cleona
    Hamed, Hisham
    Farhadi, Jian
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2016, 4 (02)
  • [5] Immediate Versus Delayed-Immediate Autologous Breast Reconstruction After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy
    Barnes, Laura L.
    Patterson, Anne
    Lem, Melinda
    Holland, Michael C.
    Lentz, Rachel
    Sbitany, Hani
    Piper, Merisa L.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2023, 90 (05) : 432 - 436
  • [6] Meta-Analysis of Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Versus Autologous Breast Reconstruction in the Setting of PMRT
    Ren, Yanxin
    Yu, Yan
    Xu, Kexin
    Li, Zhoujian
    Wang, Xiao
    AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2024, 48 (10) : 1940 - 1948
  • [7] Immediate versus delayed autologous breast reconstruction
    Khajuria, Ankur
    Farhadi, Jian
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2020, 73 (05): : 989 - 990
  • [8] National Trends in Immediate Breast Reconstruction: An Analysis of Implant-Based Versus Autologous Reconstruction After Mastectomy
    Ava D. Mandelbaum
    Carlie K. Thompson
    Deanna J. Attai
    Jennifer L. Baker
    Ginger Slack
    Maggie L. DiNome
    Peyman Benharash
    Minna K. Lee
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2020, 27 : 4777 - 4785
  • [9] National Trends in Immediate Breast Reconstruction: An Analysis of Implant-based versus Autologous Reconstruction After Mastectomy
    Mandelbaum, Ava
    Thompson, Carlie
    Attai, Deanna
    Baker, Jennifer
    Slack, Ginger
    Dinome, Maggie
    Benharash, Peyman
    Lee, Minna
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 27 (SUPPL 2) : S523 - S524
  • [10] National Trends in Immediate Breast Reconstruction: An Analysis of Implant-Based Versus Autologous Reconstruction After Mastectomy
    Mandelbaum, Ava D.
    Thompson, Carlie K.
    Attai, Deanna J.
    Baker, Jennifer L.
    Slack, Ginger
    DiNome, Maggie L.
    Benharash, Peyman
    Lee, Minna K.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 27 (12) : 4777 - 4785