National Trends in Immediate Breast Reconstruction: An Analysis of Implant-Based Versus Autologous Reconstruction After Mastectomy

被引:31
|
作者
Mandelbaum, Ava D. [1 ]
Thompson, Carlie K. [2 ]
Attai, Deanna J. [2 ]
Baker, Jennifer L. [2 ]
Slack, Ginger [3 ]
DiNome, Maggie L. [2 ]
Benharash, Peyman [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Minna K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Cardiovasc Outcomes Res Labs CORELAB, Div Cardiac Surg, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Surg, Div Gen Surg, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Surg, Div Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
关键词
PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES; DONOR-SITE MORBIDITY; RACIAL DISPARITIES; HEALTH; COMPLICATIONS; CANCER; FLAP; DIEP; TRAM; SATISFACTION;
D O I
10.1245/s10434-020-08903-x
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background. Many factors affect access to immediate breast reconstruction (IR) after mastectomy. The present study was performed to assess trends, outcomes, and predictors of IR techniques using a nationally representative cohort. Methods. The 2009-2014 National Inpatient Sample (NIS) was used to identify adult women who underwent inpatient mastectomy with IR. Patients were compared by type of reconstruction: implant-based IR versus autologous reconstruction (AR). AR was classified as a microsurgical or pedicled flap procedure. Incidence, outcomes, and predictors were assessed using Chi squared univariate tests and multivariable logistic regression analyses. Results. Of 194,073 women who underwent IR, 136,668 (70.4%) received implant-based IR and 57,405 (29.6%) received AR. Of those who underwent AR procedures, 31,336 (54.6%) received microsurgical flaps and 26,680 (46.5%) received pedicled flaps. Utilization of deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps increased significantly (28.6-42.5% of AR, P < 0.001). Predictors of AR were Black race [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 1.46, P < 0.001], lower Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (AOR = 1.25, P < 0.001), private insurance (AOR = 1.07, P = 0.030), body mass index (BMI) >= 30 kg/m(2) (AOR = 1.38, P < 0.001), urban teaching hospital designation (AOR = 1.77, P < 0.001), and high hospital volume (AOR = 3.11, P < 0.001). Similar factors were associated with the use of microsurgical flaps. AR and microsurgical flaps were associated with higher rates of acute inpatient complications, resource utilization and length of stay (LOS) compared with implant-based IR and pedicled flaps, respectively. Conclusion. Implant-based IR remains the most common type of IR, although rates of microsurgical AR are on the rise. Follow-up of complications, costs, and quality-of-life measures may show that AR provides long-term high-value care despite upfront morbidity, cost, and use of hospital resources.
引用
收藏
页码:4777 / 4785
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] National Trends in Immediate Breast Reconstruction: An Analysis of Implant-Based Versus Autologous Reconstruction After Mastectomy
    Ava D. Mandelbaum
    Carlie K. Thompson
    Deanna J. Attai
    Jennifer L. Baker
    Ginger Slack
    Maggie L. DiNome
    Peyman Benharash
    Minna K. Lee
    [J]. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2020, 27 : 4777 - 4785
  • [2] National Trends in Immediate Breast Reconstruction: An Analysis of Implant-based versus Autologous Reconstruction After Mastectomy
    Mandelbaum, Ava
    Thompson, Carlie
    Attai, Deanna
    Baker, Jennifer
    Slack, Ginger
    Dinome, Maggie
    Benharash, Peyman
    Lee, Minna
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 27 (SUPPL 2) : S523 - S524
  • [3] Mastectomy Skin Necrosis After Breast Reconstruction A Comparative Analysis Between Autologous Reconstruction and Implant-Based Reconstruction
    Sue, Gloria R.
    Lee, Gordon K.
    [J]. ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2018, 80 : S285 - S287
  • [4] Meta-Analysis of Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Versus Autologous Breast Reconstruction in the Setting of PMRT
    Ren, Yanxin
    Yu, Yan
    Xu, Kexin
    Li, Zhoujian
    Wang, Xiao
    [J]. AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2024, 48 (10) : 1940 - 1948
  • [5] ASO Author Reflections: Immediate Implant-Based Versus Autologous-Based Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy in Patients with Breast Cancer
    Ali Esparham
    Saeed Shoar
    Jennifer Whittington
    Zahra Shafaee
    [J]. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2025, 32 (3) : 2108 - 2109
  • [6] Comparison of Outcomes in Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Versus Mastectomy Alone
    Sousa, Janelle
    Sood, Ravi
    Liu, Daniel
    Calhoun, Kristine
    Louie, Otway
    Neligan, Peter
    Said, Hakim
    Mathes, David
    [J]. PLASTIC SURGERY, 2018, 26 (01) : 18 - 25
  • [7] Breast sensibility after mastectomy and implant-based breast reconstruction
    Bijkerk, E.
    van Kuijk, S. M. J.
    Beugels, J.
    Cornelissen, A. J. M.
    Heuts, E. M.
    van der Hulst, R. R. W. J.
    Tuinder, S. M. H.
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2019, 175 (02) : 369 - 378
  • [8] Breast sensibility after mastectomy and implant-based breast reconstruction
    E. Bijkerk
    S. M. J. van Kuijk
    J. Beugels
    A. J. M. Cornelissen
    E. M. Heuts
    R. R. W. J. van der Hulst
    S. M. H. Tuinder
    [J]. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2019, 175 : 369 - 378
  • [9] Higher reconstruction failure and less patient-reported satisfaction after post mastectomy radiotherapy with immediate implant-based breast reconstruction compared to immediate autologous breast reconstruction
    F. C. J. Reinders
    D. A. Young-Afat
    M. C. T. Batenburg
    S. E. Bruekers
    E. A. van Amerongen
    J. F. M. Macaré van Maurik
    A. Braakenburg
    E. Zonnevylle
    M. Hoefkens
    T. Teunis
    H. M. Verkooijen
    H. J. G. D. van den Bongard
    W. Maarse
    [J]. Breast Cancer, 2020, 27 : 435 - 444
  • [10] Higher reconstruction failure and less patient-reported satisfaction after post mastectomy radiotherapy with immediate implant-based breast reconstruction compared to immediate autologous breast reconstruction
    Reinders, F. C. J.
    Young-Afat, D. A.
    Batenburg, M. C. T.
    Bruekers, S. E.
    van Amerongen, E. A.
    Macare van Maurik, J. F. M.
    Braakenburg, A.
    Zonnevylle, E.
    Hoefkens, M.
    Teunis, T.
    Verkooijen, H. M.
    van den Bongard, H. J. G. D.
    Maarse, W.
    [J]. BREAST CANCER, 2020, 27 (03) : 435 - 444