Influence of Triple-Negative versus Luminal A Breast Cancer Subtype on Choice of Autologous versus Implant-Based Delayed-Immediate Breast Reconstruction

被引:4
|
作者
Dickey, Ryan M. [1 ]
Amaya, Joshua [1 ]
Teotia, Sumeet S. [1 ]
Haddock, Nicholas T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr Dallas, Dept Plast Surg, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
关键词
breast reconstruction; luminal A; triple negative; POSTMASTECTOMY RADIOTHERAPY; TISSUE EXPANDER; PROSTHETIC RECONSTRUCTION; RADIATION; OUTCOMES; SURVIVAL; THERAPY; IMPACT; TIME;
D O I
10.1055/s-0041-1736319
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Triple-negative (TN) and luminal A breast cancer molecular subtypes have divergent clinical and prognostic characteristics for breast cancer patients. Our study aims to compare the reconstructive choice of these two groups from the time they receive a tissue expander (TE) to the time they complete autologous or implant-based breast reconstruction. Methods A total of 255 patients who underwent delayed-immediate breast reconstruction with TE placement from 2013 to 2017 diagnosed with either TN ( n =73) or luminal A ( n =182) invasive breast cancer subtype seen by two surgeons at a single institution were identified. Preference of autologous and implant-based reconstruction was analyzed, along with TE complications, race, age, body mass index (BMI), smoking, adjuvant therapy, and comorbidities. Results There was a significant difference in the choice of implant- or autologous-based reconstruction among these two groups ( p <0.05). A greater proportion of luminal A patients underwent implant-based reconstruction (63.47%) and a greater proportion of TN patients underwent autologous-based reconstruction (53.13%). With regard to TE outcomes, there was no significant difference between the two groups with regard to duration of TE placement by reconstructive type or TE surgical complications. Significantly, more TN patients underwent radiation therapy ( p <0.01) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy ( p <0.0001) than luminal A patients. BMI, comorbidities, radiation therapy, and overall TE complications were identified as predictive factors of patients electing for autologous reconstruction over implants. Conclusion TN breast cancer patients mostly chose autologous-based reconstruction, while luminal A patients chose implant-based reconstruction. Both patient groups carried their TEs for similar duration with similar complication profile. Radiation therapy is likely a major factor in the decision for the type of delayed-immediate reconstruction among this population.
引用
收藏
页码:264 / 271
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction A Meta-analysis
    Li, Yunzhu
    Xu, Gang
    Yu, Nanze
    Huang, Jiuzuo
    Long, Xiao
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2020, 85 (04) : 437 - 447
  • [42] Impact of Radiation on Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction in Prepectoral Versus Submuscular Planes
    Thuman, Jenna M.
    Worbowtiz, Nestor
    Jain, Abishek
    Ulm, Jason P.
    Delaney, Kevin O.
    Herrera, Fernando A.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2021, 86 (6S) : S560 - S566
  • [43] Reply: Comparison of Postoperative Pain Control in Autologous Abdominal Free Flap versus Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction
    Gassman, Andrew A.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2015, 136 (05) : 699E - 700E
  • [44] Outcomes of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer In Older Versus Younger Women
    Munir, Asma
    Khawaja, Saira
    Khan, Sohail
    Sharaiha, Yousuf
    Huws, Anita M.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2023, 83 (05)
  • [45] MicroRNA expression in triple-negative versus other subtypes of breast cancer
    Kalniete, D.
    Nakazawa-Miklasevica, M.
    Strumfa, I.
    Abolins, A.
    Irmejs, A.
    Trofimovics, G.
    Gardovskis, J.
    Miklasevics, E.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2014, 50 : S67 - S68
  • [46] One-stage versus two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction after breast surgery for cancer
    Capuano, I.
    Orsaria, P.
    Caredda, E.
    Foglio, F.
    Saraceno, F.
    Sileri, P.
    Petrella, G.
    Buonomo, O. C.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2018, 92 : S32 - S32
  • [47] Patient-reported outcomes following bilateral prophylactic mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: comparing implant-based with autologous breast reconstruction
    Misere, Renee M. L.
    Joosen, Milou E. M.
    Claassens, Eva L.
    de Grzymala, Andrzej A. Piatkowski
    Heuts, Esther M.
    van der Hulst, Rene R. W. J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2022, 45 (05) : 763 - 769
  • [48] Patient-reported outcomes following bilateral prophylactic mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: comparing implant-based with autologous breast reconstruction
    Renée M. L. Miseré
    Milou E. M. Joosen
    Eva L. Claassens
    Andrzej A. Piatkowski de Grzymala
    Esther M. Heuts
    René R. W. J. van der Hulst
    European Journal of Plastic Surgery, 2022, 45 : 763 - 769
  • [49] Simple prosthesis versus prosthesis plus titanium-coated polypropylene mesh for implant-based immediate breast reconstruction after total mastectomy for breast cancer
    Yao, Xiaoli
    Guo, Yueyue
    Tu, Yi
    Yao, Feng
    Chen, Chuang
    Sun, Shengrong
    Zhang, Xinghua
    GLAND SURGERY, 2019, 8 (06) : 773 - 783
  • [50] Outcomes of Metaplastic Breast Cancer Versus Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis
    Tan, Yuping
    Yang, Biao
    Chen, Yuhong
    Yan, Xi
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 47 (12) : 3192 - 3202