Influence of Triple-Negative versus Luminal A Breast Cancer Subtype on Choice of Autologous versus Implant-Based Delayed-Immediate Breast Reconstruction

被引:4
|
作者
Dickey, Ryan M. [1 ]
Amaya, Joshua [1 ]
Teotia, Sumeet S. [1 ]
Haddock, Nicholas T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr Dallas, Dept Plast Surg, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
关键词
breast reconstruction; luminal A; triple negative; POSTMASTECTOMY RADIOTHERAPY; TISSUE EXPANDER; PROSTHETIC RECONSTRUCTION; RADIATION; OUTCOMES; SURVIVAL; THERAPY; IMPACT; TIME;
D O I
10.1055/s-0041-1736319
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Triple-negative (TN) and luminal A breast cancer molecular subtypes have divergent clinical and prognostic characteristics for breast cancer patients. Our study aims to compare the reconstructive choice of these two groups from the time they receive a tissue expander (TE) to the time they complete autologous or implant-based breast reconstruction. Methods A total of 255 patients who underwent delayed-immediate breast reconstruction with TE placement from 2013 to 2017 diagnosed with either TN ( n =73) or luminal A ( n =182) invasive breast cancer subtype seen by two surgeons at a single institution were identified. Preference of autologous and implant-based reconstruction was analyzed, along with TE complications, race, age, body mass index (BMI), smoking, adjuvant therapy, and comorbidities. Results There was a significant difference in the choice of implant- or autologous-based reconstruction among these two groups ( p <0.05). A greater proportion of luminal A patients underwent implant-based reconstruction (63.47%) and a greater proportion of TN patients underwent autologous-based reconstruction (53.13%). With regard to TE outcomes, there was no significant difference between the two groups with regard to duration of TE placement by reconstructive type or TE surgical complications. Significantly, more TN patients underwent radiation therapy ( p <0.01) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy ( p <0.0001) than luminal A patients. BMI, comorbidities, radiation therapy, and overall TE complications were identified as predictive factors of patients electing for autologous reconstruction over implants. Conclusion TN breast cancer patients mostly chose autologous-based reconstruction, while luminal A patients chose implant-based reconstruction. Both patient groups carried their TEs for similar duration with similar complication profile. Radiation therapy is likely a major factor in the decision for the type of delayed-immediate reconstruction among this population.
引用
收藏
页码:264 / 271
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Association of sociodemographic and oncological features with decision on implant-based versus autologous immediate postmastectomy breast reconstruction in Chinese patients
    Yin, Zhuming
    Wang, Yan
    Sun, Jingyan
    Huang, Qingfeng
    Liu, Jing
    He, Shanshan
    Han, Chunyong
    Wang, Shu
    Ding, Bowen
    Yin, Jian
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2019, 8 (05): : 2223 - 2232
  • [22] Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer Treatment and the Evidence-Based Interaction with Immediate Autologous and Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction
    Riba, Jordi
    Escriva de Romani, Santiago
    Masia, Jaume
    CLINICS IN PLASTIC SURGERY, 2018, 45 (01) : 25 - +
  • [23] Reply: Comparison of Immediate Implant-Based versus Staged Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction Technique
    Vardanian, Andrew J.
    Crisera, Christopher A.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2013, 131 (03) : 440E - 440E
  • [24] What's This Lump: A Comparison of Radiologic Outcomes Following Autologous Fat Grafting of Autologous Breast Reconstruction versus Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction
    Perez-Alvarez, Idanis
    Singh, Tanvee
    King, Caroline
    Welschmeyer, Alexandra
    Bartholomew, Alex
    Fan, Kenneth
    Song, David
    Tousimis, Eleni
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 28 (SUPPL 2) : S229 - S230
  • [25] Immediate versus delayed reconstruction following surgery for breast cancer
    D'Souza, Nigel
    Darmanin, Geraldine
    Fedorowicz, Zbys
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2011, (07):
  • [26] Resource cost comparison of implant-based breast reconstruction versus TRAM flap breast reconstruction
    Spear, SL
    Mardini, S
    Ganz, JC
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2003, 112 (01) : 101 - 105
  • [27] Immediate versus delayed contralateral symmetrisation in autologous breast reconstruction: A comparative study
    Peltristo, Benedetta
    Chicco, Maria
    Molina, Alexandra
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2025, 104 : 321 - 327
  • [28] Locally Advanced Breast Cancer: Autologous Versus Implant-based Reconstruction (vol 4, e622, 2016)
    Tanos
    Kirwan, Cliona C.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2016, 4 (03)
  • [29] Mesh versus acellular dermal matrix in immediate implant-based breast reconstruction - A prospective randomized trial
    Gschwantler-Kaulich, D.
    Schrenk, P.
    Bjelic-Radisic, V.
    Unterrieder, K.
    Leser, C.
    Fink-Retter, A.
    Salama, M.
    Singer, C.
    EJSO, 2016, 42 (05): : 665 - 671
  • [30] Comparative Analysis of Prepectoral versus Subpectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
    Plachinski, Sarah J.
    Boehm, Lucas M.
    Adamson, Karri A.
    LoGiudice, John A.
    Doren, Erin L.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2021, 9 (07) : E3709