Influence of Triple-Negative versus Luminal A Breast Cancer Subtype on Choice of Autologous versus Implant-Based Delayed-Immediate Breast Reconstruction

被引:4
|
作者
Dickey, Ryan M. [1 ]
Amaya, Joshua [1 ]
Teotia, Sumeet S. [1 ]
Haddock, Nicholas T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr Dallas, Dept Plast Surg, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
关键词
breast reconstruction; luminal A; triple negative; POSTMASTECTOMY RADIOTHERAPY; TISSUE EXPANDER; PROSTHETIC RECONSTRUCTION; RADIATION; OUTCOMES; SURVIVAL; THERAPY; IMPACT; TIME;
D O I
10.1055/s-0041-1736319
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Triple-negative (TN) and luminal A breast cancer molecular subtypes have divergent clinical and prognostic characteristics for breast cancer patients. Our study aims to compare the reconstructive choice of these two groups from the time they receive a tissue expander (TE) to the time they complete autologous or implant-based breast reconstruction. Methods A total of 255 patients who underwent delayed-immediate breast reconstruction with TE placement from 2013 to 2017 diagnosed with either TN ( n =73) or luminal A ( n =182) invasive breast cancer subtype seen by two surgeons at a single institution were identified. Preference of autologous and implant-based reconstruction was analyzed, along with TE complications, race, age, body mass index (BMI), smoking, adjuvant therapy, and comorbidities. Results There was a significant difference in the choice of implant- or autologous-based reconstruction among these two groups ( p <0.05). A greater proportion of luminal A patients underwent implant-based reconstruction (63.47%) and a greater proportion of TN patients underwent autologous-based reconstruction (53.13%). With regard to TE outcomes, there was no significant difference between the two groups with regard to duration of TE placement by reconstructive type or TE surgical complications. Significantly, more TN patients underwent radiation therapy ( p <0.01) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy ( p <0.0001) than luminal A patients. BMI, comorbidities, radiation therapy, and overall TE complications were identified as predictive factors of patients electing for autologous reconstruction over implants. Conclusion TN breast cancer patients mostly chose autologous-based reconstruction, while luminal A patients chose implant-based reconstruction. Both patient groups carried their TEs for similar duration with similar complication profile. Radiation therapy is likely a major factor in the decision for the type of delayed-immediate reconstruction among this population.
引用
收藏
页码:264 / 271
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evaluation of Perioperative Versus Extended Courses of Antibiotic Prophylaxis After Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction
    Zhang, Casey
    Moroni, Elizabeth A.
    Bustos, Samyd S.
    de la Cruz, Carolyn
    Gimbel, Michael L.
    Nguyen, Vu T.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2023, 90 (6S) : S593 - S597
  • [32] Comparison of Postoperative Pain Control in Autologous Abdominal Free Flap versus Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction
    Bonomi, Stefano
    Porrinis, Lara
    Santambrogio, Sara
    Settembrini, Fernanda
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2015, 136 (05) : 698E - 699E
  • [33] Breast Cancer Recurrence after Smooth versus Textured Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Matched Cohort Study
    Wu, Zhen-Yu
    Han, Hyun Ho
    Han, Jing
    Son, Byung-Ho
    Eom, Jin Sup
    Kim, Sung-Bae
    Gong, Gyungyub
    Kim, Hak Hee
    Ahn, Sei-Hyun
    Ko, BeomSeok
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2022, 150 : 30S - 37S
  • [34] Immediate versus delayed breast reconstruction in breast cancer patients in Colombia: A costutility analysis
    Helena Perea, Ana
    Rosselli, Diego
    BIOMEDICA, 2018, 38 (03): : 363 - 378
  • [35] Prepectoral versus retropectoral implant-based breast reconstruction - considerations regarding the implant pocket
    Deutschmann, C.
    Singer, C. F.
    Leser, C.
    Gschwantler-Kaulich, D.
    BREAST, 2019, 44 : S120 - S120
  • [36] Metaplastic Breast Carcinoma Versus Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Survival and Response to Treatment
    Aydiner, Adnan
    Sen, Fatma
    Tambas, Makbule
    Ciftci, Rumeysa
    Eralp, Yesim
    Saip, Pinar
    Karanlik, Hasan
    Fayda, Merdan
    Kucucuk, Seden
    Onder, Semen
    Yavuz, Ekrem
    Muslumanoglu, Mahmut
    Igci, Abdullah
    MEDICINE, 2015, 94 (52)
  • [37] National Trends and In-Hospital Outcomes for Immediate Implant-Based Versus Autologous-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis
    Esparham, Ali
    Shoar, Saeed
    Whittington, Jennifer
    Shafaee, Zahra
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, : 985 - 992
  • [38] Considerations for patient selection: Prepectoral versus subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction
    Yang, Jun Young
    Kim, Chan Woo
    Lee, Jang Won
    Kim, Seung Ki
    Lee, Seung Ah
    Hwang, Euna
    ARCHIVES OF PLASTIC SURGERY-APS, 2019, 46 (06): : 550 - 557
  • [39] Prepectoral versus retropectoral implant-based breast reconstruction - The surgical and radiotherapeutical perspective
    Deutschmann, C.
    Gschwantler-Kaulich, D.
    Dorffner, G.
    Singer, C.
    Leser, C.
    Kauer-Dorner, D.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2019, 79 (04)
  • [40] Comparison of Outcomes Using AlloDerm Versus FlexHD for Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction
    Liu, Daniel Z.
    Mathes, David W.
    Neligan, Peter C.
    Said, Hakim K.
    Louie, Otway
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2014, 72 (05) : 503 - 507