Identifying the impacts of landscape structure on ecosystem services trade-offs among ecosystem services bundles in the mountains of Southwest China

被引:1
|
作者
Li, Weijie [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kang, Jinwen [1 ]
Wang, Yong [4 ]
机构
[1] China West Normal Univ, Sch Geog Sci, Nanchong 637009, Peoples R China
[2] China West Normal Univ, Sichuan Prov Engn Lab Monitoring & Control Soil Er, Nanchong 637009, Peoples R China
[3] China West Normal Univ, Inst Jialing River Basin, Nanchong 637009, Peoples R China
[4] Southwest Univ, Sch Geog Sci, Chongqing Key Lab Karst Environm, Chongqing 400715, Peoples R China
关键词
Ecosystem services; Ecosystem services bundle; Trade-offs/synergies; Landscape composition and configuration; Driving forces; Southwest China; SYNERGIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107419
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Environmental Managers strive to enhance synergistic provisioning of ecosystem services (ESs) by optimizing landscape structure. However, understanding the impact of landscape structure on ESs trade-offs relationships from ESs bundles perspective is inadequate, particularly in distinguishing the relative contributions of landscape compositions and configurations. To fill this gap, taking the Southwest (SW) China as an example, this study quantified five relevant provisioning and regulating services, including grain production (GP), water retention (WR), carbon sequestration (CS), soil retention (SR), and habitat quality (HQ), based on biological models; analyzed the trade-offs/synergies relationships among ESs through Pearson correlation and bivariate spatial autocorrelation; further identified ESs bundles and explored the relationship between ESs trade-offs and landscape structure with the help of self-organizing map (SOM) method and redundancy analysis (RDA). Our results showed land use types influenced the spatial distribution of the five ESs, with the dominant land use in hotspot areas being forest land, and in coldspot areas being farmland and grassland. Four ESs bundles were identified based on spatial differentiation and internal structure characteristics. In the entire SW, the regulating services showed synergistic relationships with each other. However, a few trade-offs existed in different bundles (e.g., WR-CS and WR-SR in bundle 1; GP-HQ and GP-WR in bundle 2; GP-SR in bundle 3; GP-CS in bundles 4). Landscape compositions showed a stronger influence on ESs trade-offs than landscape configuration. The area proportion of woodland contributed the most to ESs in the entire SW and within bundle 1-3, while the area proportion of cultivated land was the main driver of ESs within bundle 4, indicating there was scale dependence in the relationship between landscape composition and ESs. The findings can propose targeted management measures for regional ecosystems to enhance human welfare and achieve regional high-quality development.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Spatiotemporal differentiation and trade-offs and synergies of ecosystem services in Qilian Mountains National Park
    Pei, Ruian
    Ma, Binbin
    Liu, Sixing
    Su, Jingjing
    Yu, Min
    Li, Wenjia
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2024, 169
  • [42] Spatial-Temporal Evolution, Trade-Offs and Synergies of Ecosystem Services in the Qinba Mountains
    He, Xiaofeng
    Li, Wenqing
    Xu, Xingchao
    Zhao, Xueyan
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (13)
  • [43] Spatial Trade-Offs and Synergies between Ecosystem Services in Guangdong Province, China
    Xu, Qian
    Yang, Ying
    Yang, Ren
    Zha, Li-Si
    Lin, Zi-Qing
    Shang, Shu-Hao
    LAND, 2024, 13 (01)
  • [44] Trade-offs and driving factors of multiple ecosystem services and bundles under spatiotemporal changes in the Danjiangkou Basin, China
    Zhang, Jian
    Guo, Wen
    Cheng, Changjin
    Tang, Zhiying
    Qi, Lianghua
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2022, 144
  • [45] A farming systems approach to assess synergies and trade-offs among ecosystem services
    Silva, J. F.
    Santos, J. L.
    Ribeiro, P. F.
    Marta-Pedroso, C.
    Magalhaes, M. R.
    Moreira, F.
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2024, 65
  • [46] Spatial dynamics of biophysical trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem services in the Himalayas
    Aryal, Kishor
    Maraseni, Tek
    Apan, Armando
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2023, 59
  • [47] Forecasts of urbanization scenarios reveal trade-offs between landscape change and ecosystem services
    Pickard, Brian R.
    Van Berkel, Derek
    Petrasova, Anna
    Meentemeyer, Ross K.
    LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2017, 32 (03) : 617 - 634
  • [48] Indicators and trade-offs of ecosystem services in agricultural soils along a landscape heterogeneity gradient
    Williams, Alwyn
    Hedlund, Katarina
    APPLIED SOIL ECOLOGY, 2014, 77 : 1 - 8
  • [49] Forecasts of urbanization scenarios reveal trade-offs between landscape change and ecosystem services
    Brian R. Pickard
    Derek Van Berkel
    Anna Petrasova
    Ross K. Meentemeyer
    Landscape Ecology, 2017, 32 : 617 - 634
  • [50] Distinguishing the impacts of land use change in intensity and type on ecosystem services trade-offs
    Zheng, Huining
    Peng, Jian
    Qiu, Sijing
    Xu, Zihan
    Zhou, Feng
    Xia, Pei
    Adalibieke, Wulahati
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 316