Identifying the impacts of landscape structure on ecosystem services trade-offs among ecosystem services bundles in the mountains of Southwest China

被引:1
|
作者
Li, Weijie [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kang, Jinwen [1 ]
Wang, Yong [4 ]
机构
[1] China West Normal Univ, Sch Geog Sci, Nanchong 637009, Peoples R China
[2] China West Normal Univ, Sichuan Prov Engn Lab Monitoring & Control Soil Er, Nanchong 637009, Peoples R China
[3] China West Normal Univ, Inst Jialing River Basin, Nanchong 637009, Peoples R China
[4] Southwest Univ, Sch Geog Sci, Chongqing Key Lab Karst Environm, Chongqing 400715, Peoples R China
关键词
Ecosystem services; Ecosystem services bundle; Trade-offs/synergies; Landscape composition and configuration; Driving forces; Southwest China; SYNERGIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107419
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Environmental Managers strive to enhance synergistic provisioning of ecosystem services (ESs) by optimizing landscape structure. However, understanding the impact of landscape structure on ESs trade-offs relationships from ESs bundles perspective is inadequate, particularly in distinguishing the relative contributions of landscape compositions and configurations. To fill this gap, taking the Southwest (SW) China as an example, this study quantified five relevant provisioning and regulating services, including grain production (GP), water retention (WR), carbon sequestration (CS), soil retention (SR), and habitat quality (HQ), based on biological models; analyzed the trade-offs/synergies relationships among ESs through Pearson correlation and bivariate spatial autocorrelation; further identified ESs bundles and explored the relationship between ESs trade-offs and landscape structure with the help of self-organizing map (SOM) method and redundancy analysis (RDA). Our results showed land use types influenced the spatial distribution of the five ESs, with the dominant land use in hotspot areas being forest land, and in coldspot areas being farmland and grassland. Four ESs bundles were identified based on spatial differentiation and internal structure characteristics. In the entire SW, the regulating services showed synergistic relationships with each other. However, a few trade-offs existed in different bundles (e.g., WR-CS and WR-SR in bundle 1; GP-HQ and GP-WR in bundle 2; GP-SR in bundle 3; GP-CS in bundles 4). Landscape compositions showed a stronger influence on ESs trade-offs than landscape configuration. The area proportion of woodland contributed the most to ESs in the entire SW and within bundle 1-3, while the area proportion of cultivated land was the main driver of ESs within bundle 4, indicating there was scale dependence in the relationship between landscape composition and ESs. The findings can propose targeted management measures for regional ecosystems to enhance human welfare and achieve regional high-quality development.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A sustainability framework for assessing trade-offs in ecosystem services
    Cavender-Bares, Jeannine
    Polasky, Stephen
    King, Elizabeth
    Balvanera, Patricia
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2015, 20 (01):
  • [32] Effects of habitat fragmentation on ecosystem services and their trade-offs in Southwest China: A multi-perspective analysis
    Li, Weijie
    Kang, Jinwen
    Wang, Yong
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2024, 167
  • [33] Accounting impacts of renewable energy expansions on ecosystem services to balance the trade-offs
    Aziz, Tariq
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 879
  • [34] Trade-offs in the provisioning and stability of ecosystem services in agroecosystems
    Montoya, Daniel
    Haegeman, Bart
    Gaba, Sabrina
    De Mazancourt, Claire
    Bretagnolle, Vincent
    Loreau, Michel
    ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2019, 29 (02)
  • [35] Trade-Offs between Ecosystem Services in a Mountain Region
    Briner, Simon
    Huber, Robert
    Bebi, Peter
    Elkin, Che
    Schmatz, Dirk R.
    Gret-Regamey, Adrienne
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2013, 18 (03):
  • [36] Ecosystem Services and Poverty Alleviation Trade-offs and Governance
    Bonacci, Ognjen
    HRVATSKE VODE, 2019, 27 (107) : 77 - 78
  • [37] ECOSYSTEM SERVICES FOR HUMAN WELLBEING Trade-offs and governance
    Mace, Georgina
    Schreckenberg, Kate
    Poudyal, Mahesh
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES AND POVERTY ALLEVIATION: TRADE-OFFS AND GOVERNANCE, 2018, : 305 - 316
  • [38] Mapping ecosystem services in Colombia: Analysis of synergies, trade-offs and bundles in environmental management
    Burgos-Ayala, Aracely
    Jimenez-Aceituno, Amanda
    Meacham, Megan
    Rozas-Vasquez, Daniel
    Garcia, Maria Mancilla
    Rocha, Juan
    Rincon-Ruiz, Alexander
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2024, 66
  • [39] Trade-offs Among Ecosystem Services After Vegetation Restoration in China's Loess Plateau
    Shi, Peng
    Li, Zhanbin
    Li, Peng
    Zhang, Yan
    Li, Binbin
    NATURAL RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2021, 30 (03) : 2703 - 2713
  • [40] Trade-offs Among Ecosystem Services After Vegetation Restoration in China’s Loess Plateau
    Peng Shi
    Zhanbin Li
    Peng Li
    Yan Zhang
    Binbin Li
    Natural Resources Research, 2021, 30 : 2703 - 2713