A sustainability framework for assessing trade-offs in ecosystem services

被引:92
|
作者
Cavender-Bares, Jeannine [1 ,2 ]
Polasky, Stephen [1 ,2 ,3 ]
King, Elizabeth [4 ,5 ]
Balvanera, Patricia [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Dept Ecol Evolut & Behav, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Inst Environm, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[3] Univ Minnesota, Dept Appl Econ, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[4] Univ Georgia, Odum Sch Ecol, Biol Sci, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[5] Univ Georgia, Warnell Sch Forestry & Nat Resources, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[6] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Ctr Invest Ecosistemas, Mexico City 04510, DF, Mexico
来源
ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY | 2015年 / 20卷 / 01期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
dynamics; ecosystem services; efficiency frontier; management constraints; preferences; stakeholders; time lags; trade-offs; LAND-USE; BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION; ROBUST STRATEGIES; DECISION-MAKING; CLIMATE-CHANGE; WATER-QUALITY; SYSTEMS; RESILIENCE; MANAGEMENT; MULTIPLICITY;
D O I
10.5751/ES-06917-200117
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Achieving sustainability, i.e., meeting the needs of current populations without compromising the needs of future generations, is the major challenge facing global society in the 21st century. Navigating the inherent trade-offs between provisioning, regulating, cultural, and supporting ecosystem services, and doing so in a way that does not compromise natural capital needed to provide services in the future, is critical for sustainable resource management. Here we build upon existing literature, primarily from economics and ecology, to present an analytical framework that integrates (1) the ecological mechanisms that underpin ecosystem services, (2) biophysical trade-offs and inherent limits that constrain management options, (3) preferences and values of stakeholders, and (4) explicit analysis of how systems evolve through time to ensure the goal of meeting the needs of future generations. Well-known ecological models define the relationships and trade-offs among services that represents an "efficiency frontier." Well-known methods in economics that combine preferences that define the willingness of stakeholders to trade off ecosystem services on the efficiency frontiers illuminate desirable outcomes that meet human needs. System dynamics show how the system will evolve with consequent impacts on ecosystem services and human well-being and the effects this has on achieving sustainability. Heterogeneity in biophysical constraints, uncertainty, technological advances, and obstacles imposed by societal factors and governance regimes influence potential and realized ecosystem services. Using a set of contrasting scenarios, we illustrate how progress can be made toward sustainability and the important obstacles that must be addressed in doing so. Our framework for analyzing sustainability drawn from economics and ecology is intended to make an integration of concepts from both disciplines accessible to a wider audience.
引用
收藏
页数:55
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Framework for Assessing Trade-Offs and Synergies in Green Space System Services Based on Ecosystem Services Bundles
    Chen, Lihua
    Ma, Yuan
    [J]. FORESTS, 2023, 14 (08):
  • [2] Assessing Temporal Trade-Offs of Ecosystem Services by Production Possibility Frontiers
    Jiang, Wei
    Gao, Guangyao
    Wu, Xing
    Lv, Yihe
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 15 (03)
  • [3] Trade-offs between forest ecosystem services
    Wang, Shuai
    Fu, Bojie
    [J]. FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2013, 26 : 145 - 146
  • [4] Assessing and Governing Ecosystem Services Trade-Offs in Agrarian Landscapes: The Case of Biogas
    Albert, Christian
    Hermes, Johannes
    Neuendorf, Felix
    von Haaren, Christina
    Rode, Michael
    [J]. LAND, 2016, 5 (01):
  • [5] Assessing synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem services in forest landscape management
    Jafarzadeh, Ali Akbar
    Mahdavi, Ali
    Shamsi, Seyed Rashid Fallah
    Yousefpour, Rasoul
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2021, 111
  • [6] Trade-Offs and Synergies of Ecosystem Services in Southwestern China
    Ran, Chen
    Wang, Shijie
    Bai, Xiaoyong
    Tan, Qiu
    Zhao, Cuiwei
    Luo, Xuling
    Chen, Huan
    Xi, Huipeng
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2020, 37 (10) : 669 - 678
  • [7] Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services
    Rodriguez, Jon Paul
    Beard, T. Douglas, Jr.
    Bennett, Elena M.
    Cumming, Graeme S.
    Cork, Steven J.
    Agard, John
    Dobson, Andrew P.
    Peterson, Garry D.
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2006, 11 (01):
  • [8] Ecosystem Services and Poverty Alleviation Trade-offs and Governance
    Bonacci, Ognjen
    [J]. HRVATSKE VODE, 2019, 27 (107) : 77 - 78
  • [9] Trade-offs in the provisioning and stability of ecosystem services in agroecosystems
    Montoya, Daniel
    Haegeman, Bart
    Gaba, Sabrina
    De Mazancourt, Claire
    Bretagnolle, Vincent
    Loreau, Michel
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2019, 29 (02)
  • [10] Trade-Offs between Ecosystem Services in a Mountain Region
    Briner, Simon
    Huber, Robert
    Bebi, Peter
    Elkin, Che
    Schmatz, Dirk R.
    Gret-Regamey, Adrienne
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2013, 18 (03):