A sustainability framework for assessing trade-offs in ecosystem services

被引:92
|
作者
Cavender-Bares, Jeannine [1 ,2 ]
Polasky, Stephen [1 ,2 ,3 ]
King, Elizabeth [4 ,5 ]
Balvanera, Patricia [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Dept Ecol Evolut & Behav, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Inst Environm, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[3] Univ Minnesota, Dept Appl Econ, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[4] Univ Georgia, Odum Sch Ecol, Biol Sci, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[5] Univ Georgia, Warnell Sch Forestry & Nat Resources, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[6] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Ctr Invest Ecosistemas, Mexico City 04510, DF, Mexico
来源
ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY | 2015年 / 20卷 / 01期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
dynamics; ecosystem services; efficiency frontier; management constraints; preferences; stakeholders; time lags; trade-offs; LAND-USE; BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION; ROBUST STRATEGIES; DECISION-MAKING; CLIMATE-CHANGE; WATER-QUALITY; SYSTEMS; RESILIENCE; MANAGEMENT; MULTIPLICITY;
D O I
10.5751/ES-06917-200117
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Achieving sustainability, i.e., meeting the needs of current populations without compromising the needs of future generations, is the major challenge facing global society in the 21st century. Navigating the inherent trade-offs between provisioning, regulating, cultural, and supporting ecosystem services, and doing so in a way that does not compromise natural capital needed to provide services in the future, is critical for sustainable resource management. Here we build upon existing literature, primarily from economics and ecology, to present an analytical framework that integrates (1) the ecological mechanisms that underpin ecosystem services, (2) biophysical trade-offs and inherent limits that constrain management options, (3) preferences and values of stakeholders, and (4) explicit analysis of how systems evolve through time to ensure the goal of meeting the needs of future generations. Well-known ecological models define the relationships and trade-offs among services that represents an "efficiency frontier." Well-known methods in economics that combine preferences that define the willingness of stakeholders to trade off ecosystem services on the efficiency frontiers illuminate desirable outcomes that meet human needs. System dynamics show how the system will evolve with consequent impacts on ecosystem services and human well-being and the effects this has on achieving sustainability. Heterogeneity in biophysical constraints, uncertainty, technological advances, and obstacles imposed by societal factors and governance regimes influence potential and realized ecosystem services. Using a set of contrasting scenarios, we illustrate how progress can be made toward sustainability and the important obstacles that must be addressed in doing so. Our framework for analyzing sustainability drawn from economics and ecology is intended to make an integration of concepts from both disciplines accessible to a wider audience.
引用
收藏
页数:55
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Trade-offs between fire prevention and provision of ecosystem services in Slovenia
    Mavsar, Robert
    Japelj, Anze
    Kovac, Marko
    [J]. FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2013, 29 : 62 - 69
  • [32] Ecosystem services of the Southern Ocean: trade-offs in decision-making
    Grant, Susie M.
    Hill, Simeon L.
    Trathan, Philip N.
    Murphy, Eugene J.
    [J]. ANTARCTIC SCIENCE, 2013, 25 (05) : 603 - 617
  • [33] Spatial characteristics and trade-offs of ecosystem services in arid central asia
    Ding, Qian
    Wang, Li
    Fu, Meichen
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2024, 161
  • [34] Modeling trade-offs among ecosystem services in agricultural production systems
    Balbi, Stefano
    del Prado, Agustin
    Gallejones, Patricia
    Geevan, Chandanathil Pappachan
    Pardo, Guillermo
    Perez-Minana, Elena
    Manrique, Rosa
    Hernandez-Santiago, Cuitlahuac
    Villa, Ferdinando
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2015, 72 : 314 - 326
  • [35] Urban and agricultural soils: conflicts and trade-offs in the optimization of ecosystem services
    Setala, H.
    Bardgett, R. D.
    Birkhofer, K.
    Brady, M.
    Byrne, L.
    de Ruiter, P. C.
    de Vries, F. T.
    Gardi, C.
    Hedlund, K.
    Hemerik, L.
    Hotes, S.
    Liiri, M.
    Mortimer, S. R.
    Pavao-Zuckerman, M.
    Pouyat, R.
    Tsiafouli, M.
    van der Putten, W. H.
    [J]. URBAN ECOSYSTEMS, 2014, 17 (01) : 239 - 253
  • [36] Effects of agricultural land consolidation on ecosystem services: Trade-offs and synergies
    Zhong, Lina
    Wang, Jun
    Zhang, Xiao
    Ying, Lingxiao
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 264
  • [37] Trade-offs and Synergies of Ecosystem Services in the Taihu Lake Basin of China
    QIAO Xuning
    GU Yangyang
    ZOU Changxin
    WANG Lei
    LUO Juhua
    HUANG Xianfeng
    [J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2018, 28 (01) : 86 - 99
  • [38] Trade-offs and Synergies of Ecosystem Services in the Taihu Lake Basin of China
    Xuning Qiao
    Yangyang Gu
    Changxin Zou
    Lei Wang
    Juhua Luo
    Xianfeng Huang
    [J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2018, 28 : 86 - 99
  • [39] Trade-offs and synergies between livestock production and other ecosystem services
    Accatino, Francesco
    Tonda, Alberto
    Dross, Camille
    Leger, Francois
    Tichit, Muriel
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2019, 168 : 58 - 72
  • [40] Governance of ecosystem services trade-offs in peri-urban landscapes
    Spyra, Marcin
    La Rosa, Daniele
    Zasada, Ingo
    Sylla, Marta
    Shkaruba, Anton
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2020, 95