Identifying the impacts of landscape structure on ecosystem services trade-offs among ecosystem services bundles in the mountains of Southwest China

被引:1
|
作者
Li, Weijie [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kang, Jinwen [1 ]
Wang, Yong [4 ]
机构
[1] China West Normal Univ, Sch Geog Sci, Nanchong 637009, Peoples R China
[2] China West Normal Univ, Sichuan Prov Engn Lab Monitoring & Control Soil Er, Nanchong 637009, Peoples R China
[3] China West Normal Univ, Inst Jialing River Basin, Nanchong 637009, Peoples R China
[4] Southwest Univ, Sch Geog Sci, Chongqing Key Lab Karst Environm, Chongqing 400715, Peoples R China
关键词
Ecosystem services; Ecosystem services bundle; Trade-offs/synergies; Landscape composition and configuration; Driving forces; Southwest China; SYNERGIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107419
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Environmental Managers strive to enhance synergistic provisioning of ecosystem services (ESs) by optimizing landscape structure. However, understanding the impact of landscape structure on ESs trade-offs relationships from ESs bundles perspective is inadequate, particularly in distinguishing the relative contributions of landscape compositions and configurations. To fill this gap, taking the Southwest (SW) China as an example, this study quantified five relevant provisioning and regulating services, including grain production (GP), water retention (WR), carbon sequestration (CS), soil retention (SR), and habitat quality (HQ), based on biological models; analyzed the trade-offs/synergies relationships among ESs through Pearson correlation and bivariate spatial autocorrelation; further identified ESs bundles and explored the relationship between ESs trade-offs and landscape structure with the help of self-organizing map (SOM) method and redundancy analysis (RDA). Our results showed land use types influenced the spatial distribution of the five ESs, with the dominant land use in hotspot areas being forest land, and in coldspot areas being farmland and grassland. Four ESs bundles were identified based on spatial differentiation and internal structure characteristics. In the entire SW, the regulating services showed synergistic relationships with each other. However, a few trade-offs existed in different bundles (e.g., WR-CS and WR-SR in bundle 1; GP-HQ and GP-WR in bundle 2; GP-SR in bundle 3; GP-CS in bundles 4). Landscape compositions showed a stronger influence on ESs trade-offs than landscape configuration. The area proportion of woodland contributed the most to ESs in the entire SW and within bundle 1-3, while the area proportion of cultivated land was the main driver of ESs within bundle 4, indicating there was scale dependence in the relationship between landscape composition and ESs. The findings can propose targeted management measures for regional ecosystems to enhance human welfare and achieve regional high-quality development.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Trade-offs and Synergies of Ecosystem Services in the Taihu Lake Basin of China
    QIAO Xuning
    GU Yangyang
    ZOU Changxin
    WANG Lei
    LUO Juhua
    HUANG Xianfeng
    Chinese Geographical Science, 2018, 28 (01) : 86 - 99
  • [22] Trade-offs and Synergies of Ecosystem Services in the Taihu Lake Basin of China
    Xuning Qiao
    Yangyang Gu
    Changxin Zou
    Lei Wang
    Juhua Luo
    Xianfeng Huang
    Chinese Geographical Science, 2018, 28 : 86 - 99
  • [23] Trade-offs and Synergies of Ecosystem Services in the Taihu Lake Basin of China
    QIAO Xuning
    GU Yangyang
    ZOU Changxin
    WANG Lei
    LUO Juhua
    HUANG Xianfeng
    Chinese Geographical Science , 2018, (01) : 86 - 99
  • [24] Ecosystem services trade-offs and synergies in China, 2000-2015
    Chen, W.
    Chi, G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 20 (03) : 3221 - 3236
  • [25] Trade-offs and Synergies of Ecosystem Services in the Taihu Lake Basin of China
    Qiao, Xuning
    Gu, Yangyang
    Zou, Changxin
    Wang, Lei
    Luo, Juhua
    Huang, Xianfeng
    CHINESE GEOGRAPHICAL SCIENCE, 2018, 28 (01) : 86 - 99
  • [26] A Framework for Assessing Trade-Offs and Synergies in Green Space System Services Based on Ecosystem Services Bundles
    Chen, Lihua
    Ma, Yuan
    FORESTS, 2023, 14 (08):
  • [27] Modeling trade-offs among ecosystem services in agricultural production systems
    Balbi, Stefano
    del Prado, Agustin
    Gallejones, Patricia
    Geevan, Chandanathil Pappachan
    Pardo, Guillermo
    Perez-Minana, Elena
    Manrique, Rosa
    Hernandez-Santiago, Cuitlahuac
    Villa, Ferdinando
    ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2015, 72 : 314 - 326
  • [28] Trade-Offs and Synergies between Ecosystem Services Provided by Different Rural Landscape
    Bartolini, Fabio
    Vergamini, Daniele
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2023, 13 (04):
  • [29] Assessing synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem services in forest landscape management
    Jafarzadeh, Ali Akbar
    Mahdavi, Ali
    Shamsi, Seyed Rashid Fallah
    Yousefpour, Rasoul
    LAND USE POLICY, 2021, 111
  • [30] Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services
    Rodriguez, Jon Paul
    Beard, T. Douglas, Jr.
    Bennett, Elena M.
    Cumming, Graeme S.
    Cork, Steven J.
    Agard, John
    Dobson, Andrew P.
    Peterson, Garry D.
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2006, 11 (01):