Indicators and trade-offs of ecosystem services in agricultural soils along a landscape heterogeneity gradient

被引:30
|
作者
Williams, Alwyn [1 ]
Hedlund, Katarina [2 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Ctr Environm & Climate Res, SE-22362 Lund, Sweden
[2] Lund Univ, Dept Biol, SE-22363 Lund, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Ecosystem services; Landscape complexity; Microbial community; Mycorrhiza; Soil carbon; Trade-offs; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; ORGANIC-CARBON; FUNGAL BIOMASS; MYCORRHIZAL FUNGI; FATTY-ACIDS; LAND-USE; BIODIVERSITY; QUALITY; FERTILIZATION; BACTERIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.apsoil.2014.01.001
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Soil functions can be classified as supporting (nutrient cycling) and provisioning (crop production) ecosystem services (ES). These services consist of multiple and dynamic functions and are typically assessed using indicators, e.g. microbial biomass as an indicator of supporting services. Agricultural intensification negatively affects indicators of soil functions and is therefore considered to deplete soil ES. It has been suggested that incorporating leys into crop rotations can enhance soil ES. We examined this by comparing indicators of supporting soil services - organic carbon, nitrogen, water holding capacity and available phosphorous (carbon storage and nutrient retention); net nitrogen mineralisation rate and microbial biomass (nutrient cycling and retention) - in barley fields, leys and permanent pastures along a landscape heterogeneity gradient (100, 500 and 1000 m radii). In addition, barley yields (provisioning service) were analysed against these indicators to identify trade-offs among soil services. Levels of most indicators did not differ between barley and ley fields and were consistently lower than in permanent pastures. Leys supported greater microbial biomass than barley fields. Landscape heterogeneity had no effect on the indicators or microbial community composition. However, landscape heterogeneity correlated negatively with yield and soil pH, suggesting that soils in heterogeneous landscapes are less fertile and therefore have lower yields. No trade-offs were found between increasing barley yield and the soil indicators. The results suggest that soil ES are determined at the field level, with little influence from the surrounding landscape, and that greater crop yields do not necessarily come at the expense of supporting soil services. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 8
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Urban and agricultural soils: conflicts and trade-offs in the optimization of ecosystem services
    Setala, H.
    Bardgett, R. D.
    Birkhofer, K.
    Brady, M.
    Byrne, L.
    de Ruiter, P. C.
    de Vries, F. T.
    Gardi, C.
    Hedlund, K.
    Hemerik, L.
    Hotes, S.
    Liiri, M.
    Mortimer, S. R.
    Pavao-Zuckerman, M.
    Pouyat, R.
    Tsiafouli, M.
    van der Putten, W. H.
    [J]. URBAN ECOSYSTEMS, 2014, 17 (01) : 239 - 253
  • [2] Urban and agricultural soils: conflicts and trade-offs in the optimization of ecosystem services
    H. Setälä
    R. D. Bardgett
    K. Birkhofer
    M. Brady
    L. Byrne
    P. C. de Ruiter
    F. T. de Vries
    C. Gardi
    K. Hedlund
    L. Hemerik
    S. Hotes
    M. Liiri
    S. R. Mortimer
    M. Pavao-Zuckerman
    R. Pouyat
    M. Tsiafouli
    W. H. van der Putten
    [J]. Urban Ecosystems, 2014, 17 : 239 - 253
  • [3] Aligning landscape structure with ecosystem services along an urban–rural gradient. Trade-offs and transitions towards cultural services
    Cristina Herrero-Jáuregui
    Cecilia Arnaiz-Schmitz
    Lorena Herrera
    Simon M. Smart
    Carlos Montes
    Francisco D. Pineda
    Maria Fe Schmitz
    [J]. Landscape Ecology, 2019, 34 : 1525 - 1545
  • [4] Aligning landscape structure with ecosystem services along an urban-rural gradient. Trade-offs and transitions towards cultural services
    Herrero-Jauregui, Cristina
    Arnaiz-Schmitz, Cecilia
    Herrera, Lorena
    Smart, Simon M.
    Montes, Carlos
    Pineda, Francisco D.
    Fe Schmitz, Maria
    [J]. LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2019, 34 (07) : 1525 - 1545
  • [5] Quantifying ecosystem services trade-offs from agricultural practices
    Kragt, Marit E.
    Robertson, Michael J.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2014, 102 : 147 - 157
  • [6] Bundling ecosystem services in Denmark: Trade-offs and synergies in a cultural landscape
    Turner, Katrine Grace
    Odgaard, Mette Vestergaard
    Bocher, Peder K.
    Dalgaard, Tommy
    Svenning, Jens-Christian
    [J]. LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2014, 125 : 89 - 104
  • [7] Modeling trade-offs among ecosystem services in agricultural production systems
    Balbi, Stefano
    del Prado, Agustin
    Gallejones, Patricia
    Geevan, Chandanathil Pappachan
    Pardo, Guillermo
    Perez-Minana, Elena
    Manrique, Rosa
    Hernandez-Santiago, Cuitlahuac
    Villa, Ferdinando
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2015, 72 : 314 - 326
  • [8] Effects of agricultural land consolidation on ecosystem services: Trade-offs and synergies
    Zhong, Lina
    Wang, Jun
    Zhang, Xiao
    Ying, Lingxiao
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 264
  • [9] Trade-offs in rooting strategy dimensions along an edaphic gradient in a grassland ecosystem
    Yang, Yuguo
    Russo, Sabrina E.
    [J]. FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY, 2024, 38 (04) : 792 - 807
  • [10] Trade-Offs and Synergies between Ecosystem Services Provided by Different Rural Landscape
    Bartolini, Fabio
    Vergamini, Daniele
    [J]. AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2023, 13 (04):