Motivations for and experience with labor induction at 39 weeks in women with obesity-A qualitative study

被引:0
|
作者
Hansen, Joan [1 ]
Krogh, Lise Qvirin [2 ,3 ]
Fuglsang, Jens [2 ,3 ]
Boie, Sidsel [4 ]
Henriksen, Tine Brink [3 ]
Taastrom, Katja Albert [2 ]
Kjeldsen, Anne Cathrine Maqving [2 ]
Glavind, Julie [2 ,3 ]
Lou, Stina [3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Godstrup Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Godstrup, Denmark
[2] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Aarhus, Denmark
[3] Aarhus Univ, Dept Clin Med, Aarhus, Denmark
[4] Randers Reg Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Randers, Denmark
[5] DEFACTUM Publ Hlth Res, Aarhus, Central Denmark, Denmark
关键词
induction of labor; obesity; outpatients; pregnancy; qualitative research; BIRTH EXPERIENCE; OVERWEIGHT;
D O I
10.1111/aogs.14993
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
IntroductionTiming of induction of labor (IOL) at term has been investigated in multiple settings. In Denmark, the 'When to INDuce for OverWeight' (WINDOW) study compares IOL at 39 weeks of gestation versus expectant management in low-risk women with obesity. However, knowledge on women's expectations of and experience with IOL is sparse. The aim of this study was to explore women's motivation to join the WINDOW study and their experience when randomized to IOL at 39 gestational weeks.Material and MethodsA qualitative interview study of 25 pregnant women with obesity randomized in the WINDOW study to IOL at 39 weeks of gestation was conducted. Participants were recruited from four hospitals in Central Denmark Region and were interviewed four to six weeks after giving birth. A thematic analysis was performed using a phenomenological approach.ResultsThe analysis resulted in three main themes, (1) Motivation for IOL, (2) The IOL process, and (3) IOL in recollection and in the future. Participants perceived inclusion into the WINDOW study as a "great opportunity," as they hoped to be randomized to IOL at 39 weeks of gestation. Their main motivation for participating was physical discomfort in late pregnancy and a wish for "knowing" the timing of the birth. BMI-related risk factors were mentioned by few as a motivating factor. Some participants described the IOL process as a team effort between the couple and the midwives and were positive towards future IOL. Others associated the IOL process with prolonged labor or described the body as "reluctant" to respond to the induction regime. A desire to experience spontaneous onset of labor in a future pregnancy was mentioned.ConclusionsPhysical discomfort and wanting to "control" the onset of labor were main motivations for women's decision to participate in the WINDOW study, hoping they would be allocated for IOL. Comprehensive information and being supported by midwives through the IOL process was crucial for a positive IOL experience. Some participants were positive towards a future IOL. Others speculated if their body was not ready for birth in 39 weeks of gestation and/or associated the IOL process with a challenging labor.
引用
收藏
页码:215 / 224
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks versus expectant management in low-risk multiparous women
    Sinkey, Rachel G.
    Blanchard, Christina T.
    Szychowski, Jeff M.
    Ausbeck, Elizabeth
    Subramaniam, Akila
    Tita, Alan T.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 220 (01) : S21 - S22
  • [22] Customized Probability of Vaginal Delivery With Induction of Labor and Expectant Management in Nulliparous Women at 39 Weeks of Gestation
    Peleg, David
    Warsof, Steven L.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 137 (02): : 373 - 373
  • [23] Customized Probability of Vaginal Delivery With Induction of Labor and Expectant Management in Nulliparous Women at 39 Weeks of Gestation
    Silver, Robert M.
    Rice, Madeline Murguia
    Grobman, William A.
    Reddy, Uma M.
    Tita, Alan T. N.
    Mallett, Gail
    Hill, Kim
    Thom, Elizabeth A.
    El-Sayed, Yasser Y.
    Wapner, Ronald J.
    Rouse, Dwight J.
    Saade, George R.
    Thorp, John M., Jr.
    Chauhan, Suneet P.
    Chien, Edward K.
    Casey, Brian M.
    Gibbs, Ronald S.
    Srinivas, Sindhu K.
    Swamy, Geeta K.
    Simhan, Hyagriv N.
    Macones, George A.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 136 (04): : 698 - 705
  • [24] Elective Induction of Labor Prior to 39 Weeks Initiating a Change in Culture
    Tillett, Jackie
    JOURNAL OF PERINATAL & NEONATAL NURSING, 2012, 26 (03) : 190 - 192
  • [25] Outcomes of labor induction at 39 weeks in pregnancies with a prior cesarean delivery
    Park, Bo Y.
    Cryer, Alica
    Betoni, James
    McLean, Lynn
    Figueroa, Heather
    Contag, Stephen A.
    Yao, Ruofan
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2022, 35 (15): : 2853 - 2858
  • [26] Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes of Elective Induction of Labor at 39 or More Weeks: A Prospective, Observational Study
    Lee, Soobin
    Cha, Dong Hyun
    Park, Cho Won
    Kim, Eui Hyeok
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [27] In labor or in limbo? The experiences of women undergoing induction of labor in hospital: Findings of a qualitative study
    Jay, Annabel
    Thomas, Hilary
    Brooks, Fiona
    BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 2018, 45 (01): : 64 - 70
  • [28] Women's experience of induction of labor: a mixed methods study
    Henderson, Jane
    Redshaw, Maggie
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2013, 92 (10) : 1159 - 1167
  • [30] Elective induction of trial of labor after cesarean at 39 weeks: is it risk reducing?
    Harper, Lorie M.
    Macones, George A.
    Stout, Molly J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 228 (01) : S525 - S526