Motivations for and experience with labor induction at 39 weeks in women with obesity-A qualitative study

被引:0
|
作者
Hansen, Joan [1 ]
Krogh, Lise Qvirin [2 ,3 ]
Fuglsang, Jens [2 ,3 ]
Boie, Sidsel [4 ]
Henriksen, Tine Brink [3 ]
Taastrom, Katja Albert [2 ]
Kjeldsen, Anne Cathrine Maqving [2 ]
Glavind, Julie [2 ,3 ]
Lou, Stina [3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Godstrup Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Godstrup, Denmark
[2] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Aarhus, Denmark
[3] Aarhus Univ, Dept Clin Med, Aarhus, Denmark
[4] Randers Reg Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Randers, Denmark
[5] DEFACTUM Publ Hlth Res, Aarhus, Central Denmark, Denmark
关键词
induction of labor; obesity; outpatients; pregnancy; qualitative research; BIRTH EXPERIENCE; OVERWEIGHT;
D O I
10.1111/aogs.14993
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
IntroductionTiming of induction of labor (IOL) at term has been investigated in multiple settings. In Denmark, the 'When to INDuce for OverWeight' (WINDOW) study compares IOL at 39 weeks of gestation versus expectant management in low-risk women with obesity. However, knowledge on women's expectations of and experience with IOL is sparse. The aim of this study was to explore women's motivation to join the WINDOW study and their experience when randomized to IOL at 39 gestational weeks.Material and MethodsA qualitative interview study of 25 pregnant women with obesity randomized in the WINDOW study to IOL at 39 weeks of gestation was conducted. Participants were recruited from four hospitals in Central Denmark Region and were interviewed four to six weeks after giving birth. A thematic analysis was performed using a phenomenological approach.ResultsThe analysis resulted in three main themes, (1) Motivation for IOL, (2) The IOL process, and (3) IOL in recollection and in the future. Participants perceived inclusion into the WINDOW study as a "great opportunity," as they hoped to be randomized to IOL at 39 weeks of gestation. Their main motivation for participating was physical discomfort in late pregnancy and a wish for "knowing" the timing of the birth. BMI-related risk factors were mentioned by few as a motivating factor. Some participants described the IOL process as a team effort between the couple and the midwives and were positive towards future IOL. Others associated the IOL process with prolonged labor or described the body as "reluctant" to respond to the induction regime. A desire to experience spontaneous onset of labor in a future pregnancy was mentioned.ConclusionsPhysical discomfort and wanting to "control" the onset of labor were main motivations for women's decision to participate in the WINDOW study, hoping they would be allocated for IOL. Comprehensive information and being supported by midwives through the IOL process was crucial for a positive IOL experience. Some participants were positive towards a future IOL. Others speculated if their body was not ready for birth in 39 weeks of gestation and/or associated the IOL process with a challenging labor.
引用
收藏
页码:215 / 224
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] To the question of elective induction of labor at 39 weeks of gestation, the answer lies in the question
    Rozenberg, P.
    GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE FERTILITE & SENOLOGIE, 2018, 46 (05): : 481 - 488
  • [32] Projecting future prolapse outcomes with induction of labor at 39 weeks: a decision analysis
    Lauren A. Cadish
    Jonathan P. Shepherd
    C. Emi Bretschneider
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2024, 35 : 311 - 317
  • [33] Maternal Outcomes Associated With Induction of Labor at 39 Weeks Compared With Expectant Management
    Rossi, Jordan
    Contag, Stephen
    Burn, Sabrina
    Diaz, Maria
    Yao, Ruofan
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 135 : 111S - 112S
  • [34] Projecting future prolapse outcomes with induction of labor at 39 weeks: a decision analysis
    Cadish, Lauren A.
    Shepherd, Jonathan P.
    Bretschneider, C. Emi
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2024, 35 (02) : 311 - 317
  • [35] Elective Induction of Nulliparous Labor at 39 Weeks of Gestation A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Miller, Nathaniel R.
    Cypher, Rebecca L.
    Foglia, Lisa M.
    Pates, Jason A.
    Nielsen, Peter E.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 123 : 72S - 72S
  • [36] Personalized counseling regarding induction of labor versus expectant management at 39 weeks
    Silver, Robert M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 220 (01) : S519 - S519
  • [37] Outcomes of elective induction of labor at 39 weeks compared to expectant management by age
    Hersh, Alyssa R.
    Schmidt, Eleanor M.
    Packer, Claire H.
    Garg, Bharti
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 224 (02) : S474 - S474
  • [38] The labor and birth experience of women with opioid use disorder: A qualitative study
    O'Rourke-Suchoff, Danielle
    Sobel, Lauren
    Holland, Erica
    Perkins, Rebecca
    Saia, Kelly
    Bell, Shannon
    WOMEN AND BIRTH, 2020, 33 (06) : 592 - 597
  • [39] A randomized trial of elective induction of labor at 39 weeks compared with expectant management of low-risk nulliparous women
    Grobman, William
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 218 (01) : S601 - S601
  • [40] Delivery at 39 weeks for class III obesity: labor and delivery utilization, length of stay
    Pierce, Stephanie L.
    Maxted, Marta
    Peck, Jennifer
    Lopez-Davila, Maria
    Lutz, Jessica
    Vieira, Frederico
    Atchley, Courtney
    Edwards, Rodney K.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 220 (01) : S402 - S403