Motivations for and experience with labor induction at 39 weeks in women with obesity-A qualitative study

被引:0
|
作者
Hansen, Joan [1 ]
Krogh, Lise Qvirin [2 ,3 ]
Fuglsang, Jens [2 ,3 ]
Boie, Sidsel [4 ]
Henriksen, Tine Brink [3 ]
Taastrom, Katja Albert [2 ]
Kjeldsen, Anne Cathrine Maqving [2 ]
Glavind, Julie [2 ,3 ]
Lou, Stina [3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Godstrup Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Godstrup, Denmark
[2] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Aarhus, Denmark
[3] Aarhus Univ, Dept Clin Med, Aarhus, Denmark
[4] Randers Reg Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Randers, Denmark
[5] DEFACTUM Publ Hlth Res, Aarhus, Central Denmark, Denmark
关键词
induction of labor; obesity; outpatients; pregnancy; qualitative research; BIRTH EXPERIENCE; OVERWEIGHT;
D O I
10.1111/aogs.14993
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
IntroductionTiming of induction of labor (IOL) at term has been investigated in multiple settings. In Denmark, the 'When to INDuce for OverWeight' (WINDOW) study compares IOL at 39 weeks of gestation versus expectant management in low-risk women with obesity. However, knowledge on women's expectations of and experience with IOL is sparse. The aim of this study was to explore women's motivation to join the WINDOW study and their experience when randomized to IOL at 39 gestational weeks.Material and MethodsA qualitative interview study of 25 pregnant women with obesity randomized in the WINDOW study to IOL at 39 weeks of gestation was conducted. Participants were recruited from four hospitals in Central Denmark Region and were interviewed four to six weeks after giving birth. A thematic analysis was performed using a phenomenological approach.ResultsThe analysis resulted in three main themes, (1) Motivation for IOL, (2) The IOL process, and (3) IOL in recollection and in the future. Participants perceived inclusion into the WINDOW study as a "great opportunity," as they hoped to be randomized to IOL at 39 weeks of gestation. Their main motivation for participating was physical discomfort in late pregnancy and a wish for "knowing" the timing of the birth. BMI-related risk factors were mentioned by few as a motivating factor. Some participants described the IOL process as a team effort between the couple and the midwives and were positive towards future IOL. Others associated the IOL process with prolonged labor or described the body as "reluctant" to respond to the induction regime. A desire to experience spontaneous onset of labor in a future pregnancy was mentioned.ConclusionsPhysical discomfort and wanting to "control" the onset of labor were main motivations for women's decision to participate in the WINDOW study, hoping they would be allocated for IOL. Comprehensive information and being supported by midwives through the IOL process was crucial for a positive IOL experience. Some participants were positive towards a future IOL. Others speculated if their body was not ready for birth in 39 weeks of gestation and/or associated the IOL process with a challenging labor.
引用
收藏
页码:215 / 224
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Induction of labor for women with obesity: "Weigh" more Pitocin?
    Polnaszek, Brock
    Reilly, Justine
    Raker, Christina
    Lewkowitz, Adam K.
    Danilack, Valery A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 226 (01) : S278 - S279
  • [42] Cost effectiveness of induction of labor at 39 weeks versus expectant management by cervical exam
    Fitzgerald, Alison C.
    Kaimal, Anjali J.
    Little, Sarah E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 226 (01) : S407 - S407
  • [43] Routine Elective Induction of Labor by 38-39 Weeks Advantages and Safety Concerns
    Warrier, Haridas Govinda
    Asokan, K. M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC STUDY, 2016, 3 (11) : 259 - 261
  • [44] Neonatal morbidity and mortality associated with induction of labor at 39 weeks versus expectant management
    Burn, Sabrina
    Yao, Ruofan
    Rossi, Jordan
    Diaz, Maria
    Contag, Stephen
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 222 (01) : S460 - S461
  • [45] Induction of labor versus expectant management at 39 weeks: a cost-effectiveness analysis
    Hersh, Alyssa R.
    Skeith, Ashley E.
    Sargent, James A.
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 220 (01) : S18 - S18
  • [46] Rates of Induction of Labor at 39 Weeks and Cesarean Delivery Following Publication of the ARRIVE Trial
    Wood, Rachel
    Freret, Taylor
    Clapp, Mark
    Little, Sarah
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2023, 6 (08) : E2328274
  • [47] Induction of Labor at 39 Weeks Versus Expectant Management With One Previous Cesarean Delivery
    Yao, Ruofan
    Cryer, Alicia
    Davis-Nelson, Shareece
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 135 : 172S - 172S
  • [48] Outcomes of Elective Induction of Labor at 39 Weeks from a Statewide Collaborative Quality Initiative
    Langen, Elizabeth S.
    Schiller, Amy J.
    Moore, Kathryn
    Jiang, Charley
    Bourdeau, Althea
    Morgan, Daniel M.
    Low, Lisa Kane
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2024, 41 : e1281 - e1287
  • [49] A national data sharing solution for the prevention and treatment of obesity-a qualitative study of stakeholders' needs
    Christenson, Anne
    Hemmingsson, Joanna Udden
    Lagerros, Ylva Trolle
    DIGITAL HEALTH, 2024, 10
  • [50] Induction of labor at 40 weeks in nulliparous women: Is it cost-effective?
    Kaimal, Anjau
    Little, Sarah
    Odibo, Anthony
    Stamilio, David
    Caughey, Aaron
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 197 (06) : S91 - S91