Outcomes of labor induction at 39 weeks in pregnancies with a prior cesarean delivery

被引:5
|
作者
Park, Bo Y. [1 ]
Cryer, Alica [2 ]
Betoni, James [2 ]
McLean, Lynn [2 ]
Figueroa, Heather [2 ]
Contag, Stephen A. [3 ]
Yao, Ruofan [2 ]
机构
[1] Calif State Univ Fullerton, Dept Publ Hlth, Fullerton, CA 92634 USA
[2] Loma Linda Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 11234 Anderson St 3400, Loma Linda, CA 92354 USA
[3] Univ Minnesota, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE | 2022年 / 35卷 / 15期
关键词
Induction of labor; trial of labor after cesarean delivery; vaginal birth after cesarean; INTRAVENOUS OXYTOCIN; VAGINAL BIRTH; WOMEN; POSTTERM; RUPTURE; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1080/14767058.2020.1807505
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background The optimal timing of induction for those undergoing a trial of labor after cesarean section has not been established. The little data which supports the consideration of induction at 39 weeks gestation excludes those with a history of prior cesarean section. Objective To determine the risks and benefits of elective induction of labor (IOL) at 39 weeks compared with expectant management (EM) until 42 weeks in pregnancies complicated by one previous cesarean delivery. Study Design This is a retrospective cohort analysis of singleton non-anomalous pregnancies in the United States between January 2015 and December 2017. Data was provided by the CDC National Center for Health Statistics, Division of Vital Statistics. Analyses included only pregnancies with a history of one previous cesarean delivery (CD). Perinatal outcomes of pregnancies electively induced at 39 weeks (IOL) were compared to pregnancies that were induced, augmented or underwent spontaneous labor between 40 and 42 weeks (EM). Unlabored cesarean deliveries were excluded. Outcomes of interest included: cesarean delivery, intra-amniotic infection, blood transfusion, adult intensive care unit (ICU) admission, uterine rupture, hysterectomy, 5-minute Apgar score3, prolonged neonatal ventilation, neonatal ICU (NICU) admission, neonatal seizure, perinatal/neonatal death. Log-binomial regression analysis was performed to calculate the relative risk (RR) for each outcome of interest, adjusting for confounding variables. Results There were 50,136 pregnancies included for analysis with 9,381 women in the IOL group. Compared with EM, IOL at 39 weeks decreased the risk of intra-amniotic infection (1.7% vs 3.0%,p < .001; aRR: 0.58, 95% CI: [0.49-0.68]), blood transfusion (0.3% vs. 0.5%,p = .03; aRR: 0.66, 95% CI: [0.45-0.98]), and low 5-minute Apgar score (0.31% vs 0.47%,p = .031; aRR: 0.66, 95% CI: [0.44-0.97]). Conversely, IOL increased the risk of cesarean delivery (49.0% vs 27.6%,p < .001; aRR: 1.72, 95% CI: [1.68-1.77]). Furthermore, in the EM group, 919 pregnancies developed preeclampsia and 42 progressed to eclampsia. There were no differences in other perinatal outcomes. Conclusion In pregnancies complicated by one previous cesarean delivery, elective induction of labor at 39 weeks reduced the risk of intra-amniotic infection, blood transfusion, and low 5-minute Apgar score while increased the risk of repeat cesarean delivery.
引用
收藏
页码:2853 / 2858
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Labor Induction at 39 Weeks Versus Expectant Management in Women With Prior Cesarean Delivery
    Shepherd, Megan C.
    Lee, Alan
    Olson, Gayle
    Saad, Antonio
    Saade, George R.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 135 : 173S - 173S
  • [2] Rates of Induction of Labor at 39 Weeks and Cesarean Delivery Following Publication of the ARRIVE Trial
    Wood, Rachel
    Freret, Taylor
    Clapp, Mark
    Little, Sarah
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2023, 6 (08) : E2328274
  • [3] Induction of Labor at 39 Weeks Versus Expectant Management With One Previous Cesarean Delivery
    Yao, Ruofan
    Cryer, Alicia
    Davis-Nelson, Shareece
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 135 : 172S - 172S
  • [4] Obstetric outcomes after induction of labor in women with prior cesarean delivery
    Sales, S.
    Oliveira, S.
    Mesquita Pinto, A.
    Nogueira Martins, N.
    Nogueira Martins, F.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2022, 270 : E30 - E30
  • [5] The impact of guidelines limiting elective delivery prior to 39 weeks on rates of elective induction and cesarean delivery
    Ehrenthal, Deborah
    Hoffman, Matthew
    Ostrum, Gordon
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 204 : S221 - S222
  • [6] Induction of labor in women with a prior cesarean delivery
    Hoffman, Matthew K.
    Grant, Gwendolyn Hunter
    SEMINARS IN PERINATOLOGY, 2015, 39 (06) : 471 - 474
  • [7] Induction of Labor versus Cesarean Delivery in Twin Pregnancies
    Zafman, Kelly B.
    Rebarber, Andrei
    Melka, Stephanie
    Naqvi, Mariam
    Fox, Nathan S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2020, 37 (13) : 1324 - 1334
  • [8] Elective Induction of Labor Following Prior Cesarean Delivery
    Saucedo, Alexander M.
    Macones, George A.
    Cahill, Alison G.
    Harper, Lorie M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2024, 41 (15) : 2033 - 2039
  • [9] Elective induction of labor following prior cesarean delivery
    Saucedo, Alexander M.
    Macones, George A.
    Cahill, Alison G.
    Harper, Lorie M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 228 (01) : S421 - S422
  • [10] Induction of labor vs. cesarean delivery in twin pregnancies
    Zafman, Kelly
    Rebarber, Andrei
    Melka, Stephanie
    Naqvi, Mariam
    Fox, Nathan S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 220 (01) : S226 - S227