Comparison of Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope with the C-MAC and Tuoren Videolaryngoscopes in Facilitating Endotracheal Intubation during Uninterrupted Manual Chest Compression: A Randomized Crossover Manikin Study

被引:0
|
作者
Kumar, Rajender [1 ]
Kumar, Rakesh [2 ]
Kumar, Naveen [1 ]
机构
[1] Dr Baba Saheb Ambedkar Med Coll & Hosp, Dept Crit Care, New Delhi, India
[2] Dr Baba Saheb Ambedkar Med Coll & Hosp, Dept Anesthesia & Crit Care, New Delhi, India
关键词
Airway management; Cardiac arrest; Direct laryngoscopy; Endotracheal intubation; Videolaryngoscope; CARDIOPULMONARY-RESUSCITATION; VIDEO LARYNGOSCOPY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Videolaryngoscopes (VLS) frequently provide superior views of the glottis compared with traditional direct laryngoscopy (DL), especially during unexpected difficult airways. Chest compressions during attempts to intubate the trachea make it a difficult situation. Although VLS have been compared with DL for intubation during resuscitation, there is a paucity of literature comparing VLS with integrated screen and distant screen with DL during continued manual chest compressions. Materials and methods: This was a prospective, randomized, crossover observational manikin study. A total of 20 participants performed intubation, while manual chest compression was continuing, with each of the three devices on six occasions, but in different, randomized order. The primary outcome parameter was the total time taken for successful intubation. The secondary outcome criteria included the number of attempts, ease of intubation, and the device preference. Results: Time taken for successful intubation and ease of intubation were significantly better with C-MAC VLS and DL as compared with Tuoren VLS (C-MAC vs Tuoren p < 0.000 for both; DL vs Tuoren p < 0.001 for time and p = 0.021 for ease). There was no significant difference between C-MAC and DL (p = 1.0 for time and p = 0.69 for ease). There was no significant difference with regard to the number of attempts for successful intubation with any of these devices (p = 0.310). C-MAC was the most and Tuoren was the least preferred device. Conclusion: C-MAC VLS and Macintosh DL are significantly easier to use and require significantly less time to achieve successful intubation as compared with the Tuoren VLS during continued manual chest compression. Among the devices tested, C-MAC VLS was the most preferred for endotracheal intubation during uninterrupted manual chest compressions.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 116
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparative Evaluation of Ease of Nasotracheal Intubation Using C-MAC versus TuoRen Video Laryngoscope in Adult Surgical Patients: A Randomized Study
    Rajan, Sunil
    Chandrasekharan, Rejitha
    Mathew, Jacob
    Roy, Roniya Ann
    Rajkumar, Reshma
    Paul, Jerry
    JOURNAL OF HEAD & NECK PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS, 2024, 12 (01): : 69 - 73
  • [32] Child endotracheal intubation with a Clarus Levitan fiberoptic stylet vs Macintosh laryngoscope during resuscitation performed by paramedics: a randomized crossover manikin trial
    Szarpak, Lukasz
    Truszewski, Zenon
    Czyzewski, Lukasz
    Kurowski, Andrzej
    Bogdanski, Lukasz
    Zasko, Piotr
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2015, 33 (11): : 1547 - 1551
  • [33] Airtraq Laryngoscope Versus the Conventional Macintosh Laryngoscope During Pediatric Intubation Performed by Nurses: A Randomized Crossover Manikin Study With Three Airway Scenarios
    Szarpak, Lukasz
    Karczewska, Katarzyna
    Czyzewski, Lukasz
    Truszewski, Zenon
    Kurowski, Andrzej
    PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE, 2017, 33 (11) : 735 - 739
  • [34] Comparison of the C-MAC D-blade video laryngoscope and the McCoy laryngoscope for double-lumen endotracheal tube intubation A prospective randomized controlled study
    Kim, Kyung Mi
    Seo, Kwon Hui
    Kim, You Jung
    John, Hyunji
    Moon, Hyun Soo
    Kim, Namhyun
    Yeon, Nayoung
    MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (45) : E31775
  • [35] Pentax-AWS is More Useful Than Macintosh Laryngoscope and Airtraq to Establish Tracheal Intubation while Uninterrupted Chest Compression: a Comparative Study with Manikin
    Koyama, Jun-ichl
    CIRCULATION, 2008, 118 (18) : S1481 - S1481
  • [36] A comparison of the McGrath-MAC and Macintosh laryngoscopes for child tracheal intubation during resuscitation by paramedics. A randomized, crossover, manikin study
    Szarpak, Lukasz
    Truszewski, Zenon
    Czyzewski, Lukasz
    Gaszynski, Tomasz
    Rodriguez-Nunez, Antonio
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2016, 34 (08): : 1338 - 1341
  • [37] Comparison of AirAngel® vs. Storz® videolaryngoscope and Macintosh® laryngoscope for endotracheal intubation training: prospective randomized crossover study
    Merter, Seyhmus
    Kayayurt, Kamil
    Kitapcioglu, Dilek
    Yaylaci, Serpil
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [38] A comparison of the Macintosh laryngoscope and blind intubation via I-gel in intubating an entrapped patient: A randomized crossover manikin study
    Bielski, Karol
    Smereka, Jacek
    Ladny, Jerzy R.
    Szarpak, Lukasz
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2017, 35 (05): : 787 - 789
  • [39] The pressure exerted on the tongue during intubation with simultaneous cervical spine immobilisation: a comparison between four videolaryngoscopes and the Macintosh laryngoscope-a manikin study
    Aleksandrowicz, Dawid
    Gaszynski, Tomasz
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MONITORING AND COMPUTING, 2018, 32 (05) : 907 - 913
  • [40] A comparison of intubating conditions for nasotracheal intubation with standard direct Macintosh laryngoscope versus C-MAC® video laryngoscope employing cuff inflation technique in adult patients
    Kasaudhan, Sonia
    Gupta, Madhu
    Singh, Kriti
    Khan, Anas
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2021, 65 (15) : 104 - 109