Comparison of Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope with the C-MAC and Tuoren Videolaryngoscopes in Facilitating Endotracheal Intubation during Uninterrupted Manual Chest Compression: A Randomized Crossover Manikin Study

被引:0
|
作者
Kumar, Rajender [1 ]
Kumar, Rakesh [2 ]
Kumar, Naveen [1 ]
机构
[1] Dr Baba Saheb Ambedkar Med Coll & Hosp, Dept Crit Care, New Delhi, India
[2] Dr Baba Saheb Ambedkar Med Coll & Hosp, Dept Anesthesia & Crit Care, New Delhi, India
关键词
Airway management; Cardiac arrest; Direct laryngoscopy; Endotracheal intubation; Videolaryngoscope; CARDIOPULMONARY-RESUSCITATION; VIDEO LARYNGOSCOPY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Videolaryngoscopes (VLS) frequently provide superior views of the glottis compared with traditional direct laryngoscopy (DL), especially during unexpected difficult airways. Chest compressions during attempts to intubate the trachea make it a difficult situation. Although VLS have been compared with DL for intubation during resuscitation, there is a paucity of literature comparing VLS with integrated screen and distant screen with DL during continued manual chest compressions. Materials and methods: This was a prospective, randomized, crossover observational manikin study. A total of 20 participants performed intubation, while manual chest compression was continuing, with each of the three devices on six occasions, but in different, randomized order. The primary outcome parameter was the total time taken for successful intubation. The secondary outcome criteria included the number of attempts, ease of intubation, and the device preference. Results: Time taken for successful intubation and ease of intubation were significantly better with C-MAC VLS and DL as compared with Tuoren VLS (C-MAC vs Tuoren p < 0.000 for both; DL vs Tuoren p < 0.001 for time and p = 0.021 for ease). There was no significant difference between C-MAC and DL (p = 1.0 for time and p = 0.69 for ease). There was no significant difference with regard to the number of attempts for successful intubation with any of these devices (p = 0.310). C-MAC was the most and Tuoren was the least preferred device. Conclusion: C-MAC VLS and Macintosh DL are significantly easier to use and require significantly less time to achieve successful intubation as compared with the Tuoren VLS during continued manual chest compression. Among the devices tested, C-MAC VLS was the most preferred for endotracheal intubation during uninterrupted manual chest compressions.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 116
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of results from novice and trained personnel using the Macintosh laryngoscope, Pentax AWS®, C-MAC™ and Bonfils intubation fibrescope: a manikin study
    Lye, Soh Teng
    Liaw, Chen Mei
    Seet, Edwin
    Koh, Kwong Fah
    SINGAPORE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 54 (02) : 64 - 68
  • [22] C-MAC Video Laryngoscope versus Conventional Direct Laryngoscopy for Endotracheal Intubation During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
    Min, Byeong Chul
    Park, Jong Eun
    Lee, Gun Tak
    Kim, Tae Rim
    Yoon, Hee
    Cha, Won Chul
    Shin, Tae Gun
    Song, Keun Jeong
    Park, Minsu
    Han, Heewon
    Hwang, Sung Yeon
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2019, 55 (06):
  • [23] Comparison of the Macintosh laryngoscope and blind intubation via the iGEL for Intubation With C-spine immobilization: A Randomized, crossover, manikin trial
    Gawlowski, Pawel
    Smereka, Jacek
    Madziala, Marcin
    Szarpak, Lukasz
    Frass, Michael
    Robak, Oliver
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2017, 35 (03): : 484 - 487
  • [24] Comparison of Time to Intubation of a Double-Lumen Endobronchial Tube Utilizing C-MAC® Versus GlideScope® Versus Macintosh Blade: A Randomized Crossover Manikin Study
    Rajagopal, Srinivasan
    Gardner, Richard N.
    Swanson, Elizabeth
    Kim, Sung
    Sondekoppam, Rakesh
    Ueda, Kenichi
    Hanada, Satoshi
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (12)
  • [25] Comparing Alba 3D printed video laryngoscope vs. video laryngoscope C-MAC® vs. direct macintosh laryngoscope operated by medical students: A randomized, crossover, manikin study
    Anzari, Raja Ahmad
    Kadarsah, Rudi Kurniadi
    Rachman, Iwan Abdul
    PERIOPERATIVE CARE AND OPERATING ROOM MANAGEMENT, 2024, 35
  • [26] Comparison of the Success of Two Techniques for the Endotracheal Intubation with C-MAC Video Laryngoscope Miller Blade in Children: A Prospective Randomized Study
    Sinha, Renu
    Sharma, Ankur
    Ray, Bikash Ranjan
    Pandey, Ravinder Kumar
    Darlong, Vanlalnghka
    Punj, Jyotsna
    Chandralekha, Chandralekha
    Upadhyay, Ashish Datt
    ANESTHESIOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2016, 2016
  • [27] Comparison of Macintosh laryngoscope, non-channelled (C-MAC video-laryngoscope) and channelled laryngoscope (Airtraq) for intubation in lateral position - A prospective randomized controlled study
    Sultana, Farheen
    Nikhar, Sapna Annaji
    Durga, Padmaja
    TRENDS IN ANAESTHESIA AND CRITICAL CARE, 2021, 40 : 30 - 34
  • [28] Comparison of the McGrath MAC video laryngoscope and the Pentax Airwayscope during chest compression: a manikin study
    Atsushi Kotera
    Hiroki Irie
    Shinsuke Iwashita
    Junichi Taniguchi
    Shunji Kasaoka
    Yoshihiro Kinoshita
    Journal of Intensive Care, 2 (1)
  • [29] Comparison of the McGrath MAC video laryngoscope and the Pentax Airwayscope during chest compression: a manikin study
    Kotera, Atsushi
    Irie, Hiroki
    Iwashita, Shinsuke
    Taniguchi, Junichi
    Kasaoka, Shunji
    Kinoshita, Yoshihiro
    JOURNAL OF INTENSIVE CARE, 2014, 2
  • [30] The pressure exerted on the tongue during intubation with simultaneous cervical spine immobilisation: a comparison between four videolaryngoscopes and the Macintosh laryngoscope—a manikin study
    Dawid Aleksandrowicz
    Tomasz Gaszyński
    Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 2018, 32 : 907 - 913