Comparison of Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope with the C-MAC and Tuoren Videolaryngoscopes in Facilitating Endotracheal Intubation during Uninterrupted Manual Chest Compression: A Randomized Crossover Manikin Study

被引:0
|
作者
Kumar, Rajender [1 ]
Kumar, Rakesh [2 ]
Kumar, Naveen [1 ]
机构
[1] Dr Baba Saheb Ambedkar Med Coll & Hosp, Dept Crit Care, New Delhi, India
[2] Dr Baba Saheb Ambedkar Med Coll & Hosp, Dept Anesthesia & Crit Care, New Delhi, India
关键词
Airway management; Cardiac arrest; Direct laryngoscopy; Endotracheal intubation; Videolaryngoscope; CARDIOPULMONARY-RESUSCITATION; VIDEO LARYNGOSCOPY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Videolaryngoscopes (VLS) frequently provide superior views of the glottis compared with traditional direct laryngoscopy (DL), especially during unexpected difficult airways. Chest compressions during attempts to intubate the trachea make it a difficult situation. Although VLS have been compared with DL for intubation during resuscitation, there is a paucity of literature comparing VLS with integrated screen and distant screen with DL during continued manual chest compressions. Materials and methods: This was a prospective, randomized, crossover observational manikin study. A total of 20 participants performed intubation, while manual chest compression was continuing, with each of the three devices on six occasions, but in different, randomized order. The primary outcome parameter was the total time taken for successful intubation. The secondary outcome criteria included the number of attempts, ease of intubation, and the device preference. Results: Time taken for successful intubation and ease of intubation were significantly better with C-MAC VLS and DL as compared with Tuoren VLS (C-MAC vs Tuoren p < 0.000 for both; DL vs Tuoren p < 0.001 for time and p = 0.021 for ease). There was no significant difference between C-MAC and DL (p = 1.0 for time and p = 0.69 for ease). There was no significant difference with regard to the number of attempts for successful intubation with any of these devices (p = 0.310). C-MAC was the most and Tuoren was the least preferred device. Conclusion: C-MAC VLS and Macintosh DL are significantly easier to use and require significantly less time to achieve successful intubation as compared with the Tuoren VLS during continued manual chest compression. Among the devices tested, C-MAC VLS was the most preferred for endotracheal intubation during uninterrupted manual chest compressions.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 116
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Efficacy of bougie first approach for endotracheal intubation with video laryngoscopy during continuous chest compression: a randomized crossover manikin trial
    Xu, Xiaohan
    Ma, Haobo
    Zhang, Yuelun
    Liu, Wei
    Jung, Boris
    Li, Xu
    Shen, Le
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2024, 24 (01):
  • [42] Comparison of the VivaSight single lumen endotracheal tube and the Macintosh laryngoscope for emergency intubation by experienced paramedics in a standardized airway manikin with restricted access: a randomized, crossover trial
    Truszewski, Zenon
    Szarpak, Lukasz
    Smereka, Jacek
    Kurowski, Andrzej
    Evrin, Togay
    Czyzewski, Lukasz
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2016, 34 (05): : 929 - 930
  • [43] A Randomized, Crossover Comparison of C-Mac Dblade, Glidescope, and Conventional Macintosh Laryngoscopy During Routine Induction of Anesthesia
    Cavus, E.
    Neumann, T.
    Doerges, V
    Bein, B.
    Serocki, G.
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2010, 56 (03) : S25 - S25
  • [44] Comparison of conventional C-MAC video laryngoscope guided intubation by anesthesia trainees with and without Frova endotracheal introducer: A randomized clinical trial
    Arasu, Meenupriya
    Rudingwa, Priya
    Satyaprakash, Mv S.
    Panneerselvam, Sakthirajan
    Kuberan, Aswini
    JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2020, 36 (04) : 483 - 488
  • [45] Comparison of hemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and intubation using Macintosh or McCoy or C-MAC laryngoscope during uniform depth of anesthesia monitored by entropy
    Rajasekhar, M.
    Yadav, Monu
    Kulkarni, Dilip
    Gopinath, R.
    JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2020, 36 (03) : 391 - 397
  • [46] Comparison of intubation through the McGrath MAC, GlideScope, AirTraq, and Miller Laryngoscope by paramedics during child CPR: a randomized crossover manikin trial
    Szarpak, Lukasz
    Karczewska, Katarzyna
    Evrin, Togay
    Kurowski, Andrzej
    Czyzewski, Lukasz
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2015, 33 (07): : 946 - 950
  • [47] Comparison of Macintosh, McCoy and C-MAC D-Blade video laryngoscope intubation by prehospital emergency health workers: a simulation study
    Ahmet Yildirim
    Hasan A. Kiraz
    İbrahim Ağaoğlu
    Okhan Akdur
    Internal and Emergency Medicine, 2017, 12 : 91 - 97
  • [48] Comparison of Macintosh, McCoy and C-MAC D-Blade video laryngoscope intubation by prehospital emergency health workers: a simulation study
    Yildirim, Ahmet
    Kiraz, Hasan A.
    Agaoglu, Ibrahim
    Akdur, Okhan
    INTERNAL AND EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2017, 12 (01) : 91 - 97
  • [49] EFFECTS OF USING AN ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE INTRODUCER FOR INTUBATION DURING MECHANICAL CHEST COMPRESSIONS OF A MANIKIN: RANDOMIZED, PROSPECTIVE, CROSSOVER STUDY
    Ozbek, Asim Enes
    Halhalli, Huseyin Cahit
    Yilmaz, Serkan
    Celik, Emrah
    Ozerol, Hakan
    Sanci, Emre
    JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2020, 59 (01): : 56 - 60
  • [50] Comparison of UESCOPE VL 400, I-View, Non-Channeled Airtraq Videolaryngoscopes and Macintosh Laryngoscope for Tracheal Intubation in Simulated Out-of-Hospital Conditions: A Randomized Crossover Manikin Study
    Ratajczyk, Pawel
    Dolder, Przemyslaw
    Szmyd, Bartosz
    Gomez-Rios, Manuel A.
    Hogendorf, Piotr
    Durczynski, Adam
    Gaszynski, Tomasz
    HEALTHCARE, 2024, 12 (04)