Comparison of Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope with the C-MAC and Tuoren Videolaryngoscopes in Facilitating Endotracheal Intubation during Uninterrupted Manual Chest Compression: A Randomized Crossover Manikin Study

被引:0
|
作者
Kumar, Rajender [1 ]
Kumar, Rakesh [2 ]
Kumar, Naveen [1 ]
机构
[1] Dr Baba Saheb Ambedkar Med Coll & Hosp, Dept Crit Care, New Delhi, India
[2] Dr Baba Saheb Ambedkar Med Coll & Hosp, Dept Anesthesia & Crit Care, New Delhi, India
关键词
Airway management; Cardiac arrest; Direct laryngoscopy; Endotracheal intubation; Videolaryngoscope; CARDIOPULMONARY-RESUSCITATION; VIDEO LARYNGOSCOPY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Videolaryngoscopes (VLS) frequently provide superior views of the glottis compared with traditional direct laryngoscopy (DL), especially during unexpected difficult airways. Chest compressions during attempts to intubate the trachea make it a difficult situation. Although VLS have been compared with DL for intubation during resuscitation, there is a paucity of literature comparing VLS with integrated screen and distant screen with DL during continued manual chest compressions. Materials and methods: This was a prospective, randomized, crossover observational manikin study. A total of 20 participants performed intubation, while manual chest compression was continuing, with each of the three devices on six occasions, but in different, randomized order. The primary outcome parameter was the total time taken for successful intubation. The secondary outcome criteria included the number of attempts, ease of intubation, and the device preference. Results: Time taken for successful intubation and ease of intubation were significantly better with C-MAC VLS and DL as compared with Tuoren VLS (C-MAC vs Tuoren p < 0.000 for both; DL vs Tuoren p < 0.001 for time and p = 0.021 for ease). There was no significant difference between C-MAC and DL (p = 1.0 for time and p = 0.69 for ease). There was no significant difference with regard to the number of attempts for successful intubation with any of these devices (p = 0.310). C-MAC was the most and Tuoren was the least preferred device. Conclusion: C-MAC VLS and Macintosh DL are significantly easier to use and require significantly less time to achieve successful intubation as compared with the Tuoren VLS during continued manual chest compression. Among the devices tested, C-MAC VLS was the most preferred for endotracheal intubation during uninterrupted manual chest compressions.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 116
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of the GlideScope® with the Macintosh laryngoscope in endotracheal intubation during uninterrupted mechanical chest compression: a randomised crossover manikin study
    Yeung, F. S. H.
    Lam, R. P. K.
    Wong, T. W.
    Chan, L. W.
    HONG KONG JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2016, 23 (03) : 159 - 167
  • [2] Endotracheal Intubation Using the Macintosh Laryngoscope or KingVision Video Laryngoscope during Uninterrupted Chest Compression
    Gaszynska, Ewelina
    Gaszynski, Tomasz
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 2014
  • [3] Comparative evaluation of C-MAC and McGrath MAC videolaryngoscopes with Macintosh direct laryngoscope for endotracheal intubation in adult patients undergoing elective surgeries
    Abhyankar, Prachi
    Sabharwal, Nikki
    Gupta, Anju
    Das, Akshaya K.
    JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2023, 39 (03) : 422 - 428
  • [4] A Comparison of the C-MAC Video Laryngoscope to the Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope for Intubation in the Emergency Department
    Sakles, John C.
    Mosier, Jarrod
    Chiu, Stephen
    Cosentino, Mari
    Kalin, Leah
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2012, 60 (06) : 739 - 748
  • [5] Macintosh laryngoscope and i-view™ and C-MAC® video laryngoscopes for tracheal intubation with an aerosol box: a randomized crossover manikin study
    Nakanishi, Toshiyuki
    Sento, Yoshiki
    Kamimura, Yuji
    Sobue, Kazuya
    JA CLINICAL REPORTS, 2021, 7 (01)
  • [6] Macintosh laryngoscope and i-view™ and C-MAC® video laryngoscopes for tracheal intubation with an aerosol box: a randomized crossover manikin study
    Toshiyuki Nakanishi
    Yoshiki Sento
    Yuji Kamimura
    Kazuya Sobue
    JA Clinical Reports, 7
  • [7] Endotracheal intubation using the C-MAC® video laryngoscope or the Macintosh laryngoscope: A prospective, comparative study in the ICU
    Ruediger R Noppens
    Stephanie Geimer
    Nicole Eisel
    Matthias David
    Tim Piepho
    Critical Care, 16
  • [8] Endotracheal intubation using the C-MAC® video laryngoscope or the Macintosh laryngoscope: A prospective, comparative study in the ICU
    Noppens, Ruediger R.
    Geimer, Stephanie
    Eisel, Nicole
    David, Matthias
    Piepho, Tim
    CRITICAL CARE, 2012, 16 (03):
  • [9] Comparison of three videolaryngoscopes: Pentax Airway Scope, C-MAC™, Glidescope® vs the Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation
    Teoh, W. H. L.
    Saxena, S.
    Shah, M. K.
    Sia, A. T. H.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2010, 65 (11) : 1126 - 1132
  • [10] Comparison of the AP Advance™ Video Laryngoscope and C-MAC® Video Laryngoscope with the Macintosh 3 Blade for intubation of the difficult airway: a manikin study
    Davies, O.
    Kourteli, E.
    Cecconi, M.
    Garewel, D.
    Mir, F.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2016, 116 (06) : E899 - E899