Optimal screw orientation for fixation of coronal shear fractures: a biomechanical comparison

被引:0
|
作者
Lappen, Sebastian [1 ]
Siebenlist, Sebastian [1 ]
Leschinger, Tim [2 ,3 ]
Kadantsev, Pavel [1 ]
Geyer, Stephanie [1 ,4 ]
Wegmann, Kilian [2 ,3 ,5 ]
Mueller, Lars-Peter
Hackl, Michael [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Dept Sports Orthopead, Klinikum Rechts Isar, Ismaninger Str 22, D-81675 Munich, Germany
[2] Univ Cologne, Fac Med, Ctr Orthoped & Trauma Surg, Cologne, Germany
[3] Univ Cologne, Univ Hosp, Ctr Orthoped & Trauma Surg, Cologne, Germany
[4] St Vinzenz Klin, Dept Orthoped, Pfronten, Germany
[5] OCM Orthopad Chirurg Munchen Clin, Munich, Germany
关键词
Capitellum; distal humerus; elbow; fracture fixation; humeral fracture; osteosynthesis; INTERNAL-FIXATION; OPEN REDUCTION; CAPITELLUM;
D O I
10.1016/j.jse.2024.05.007
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Coronal shear fractures of the capitellum are rare injuries which can be challenging to treat. The aim of this study was to compare the biomechanical properties of different internal screw fixation techniques for Dubberley type IA fractures of the capitellum. Methods: In this biomechanical study, Dubberley type IA fractures of the capitellum were created in 30 human fresh-frozen humeri. The specimens were then divided into 3 groups: fixation was either performed with 3 x 3.0 mm headless cannulated compression screws (HCCSs) in anteroposterior (AP) orientation (AP group), 3 x 3.0 mm HCCSs in posteroanterior (PA) orientation (PA group) or with 2 x 3.0 mm HCCSs in PA orientation and 1 x 3.0 mm HCCS in lateral orientation (LAT) group. Displacement under cyclic loading and ultimate load-to-failure were evaluated in all specimens. Results: There was no significant difference in fragment displacement after 2000 cycles between AP and PA groups (0.8 +/- 0.5 mm vs. 0.8 +/- 0.6 mm; P = .987) or PA and LAT groups (0.8 +/- 0.6 mm vs. 0.8 +/- 0.3 mm; P = .966). LAT group showed the highest load-to- failure (548 +/- 250 N) without reaching statistically significant difference to AP group (388 +/- 173 N; P = .101). There was also no significant difference between AP and PA groups (388 +/- 173 N vs. 422 +/- 114 N; P = .649). Conclusions: Variations in screw placement had no statistically significant influence on cyclic displacement or load-to-failure in Dubberley Type IA fractures. However, fracture fixation in 2 planes-both the coronal and the sagittal plane-by adding a screw in a lateral to medial direction may be beneficial to increase primary stability.
引用
收藏
页码:543 / 549
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Headless Compression Screw Fixation for Proximal Phalanx Fractures: A Biomechanical Study
    Fader, Lauren
    Robinson, Luke
    Voor, Michael
    HAND-AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR HAND SURGERY, 2022, 17 (02): : 239 - 244
  • [42] BIOMECHANICAL VALIDATION OF SOLITARY LAG SCREW FIXATION OF MANDIBULAR ANGLE FRACTURES
    HOSAKA, N
    SHETTY, V
    CAPUTO, A
    BERTOLAMI, C
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1990, 69 : 152 - 152
  • [43] Biomechanical Comparison of a Closed-Loop Double Endobutton to a Lag Screw in Fixation of Posterior Malleolar Fractures
    Cici, Hakan
    Ozmanevra, Ramadan
    Bektas, Yunus Emre
    Ciklacandir, Samet
    Demirkiran, Nihat Demirhan
    Isler, Yalcin
    Erduran, Mehmet
    Basci, Onur
    JOURNAL OF FOOT & ANKLE SURGERY, 2022, 61 (05): : 975 - 978
  • [44] Biomechanical comparison using finite element analysis of different screw configurations in the fixation of femoral neck fractures
    Gok, K.
    Inal, S.
    MECHANICAL SCIENCES, 2015, 6 (02) : 173 - 179
  • [45] Biomechanical comparison of plate and screw fixation in anterior pelvic ring fractures with low bone mineral density
    Acklin, Yves P.
    Zderic, Ivan
    Buschbaum, Jan
    Varga, Peter
    Inzana, Jason A.
    Grechenig, Stephan
    Richards, R. Geoff
    Gueorguiev, Boyko
    Schmitz, Paul
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2016, 47 (07): : 1456 - 1460
  • [46] Biomechanical comparison of fixation of type-I fractures of the lateral tibial plateau - Is the antiglide screw effective?
    Parker, PJ
    Tepper, KB
    Brumback, RJ
    Novak, VP
    Belkoff, SM
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1999, 81B (03): : 478 - 480
  • [47] Biceps Tenodesis With Interference Screw Fixation: A Biomechanical Comparison of Screw Length and Diameter
    Slabaugh, Maj Mark A.
    Frank, Rachel M.
    Van Thiel, Geoffrey S.
    Bell, Rebecca M.
    Wang, Vincent M.
    Trenhaile, Scott
    Provencher, Matthew T.
    Romeo, Anthony A.
    Verma, Nikhil N.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2011, 27 (02): : 161 - 166
  • [48] External Ring Fixation Versus Screw Fixation for Ankle Arthrodesis: A Biomechanical Comparison
    Ogut, Tahir
    Glisson, Richard R.
    Chuckpaiwong, Bavornrit
    Le, Ian L. D.
    Easley, Mark E.
    FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 30 (04) : 353 - 360
  • [49] Biomechanical Comparison of Costotransverse Process Screw Fixation and Pedicle Screw Fixation of the Upper Thoracic Spine COMMENTS
    Maiman, Dennis J.
    Mummaneni, Praveen V.
    Traynelis, Vincent C.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2010, 66 (03) : 182 - 182
  • [50] A biomechanical comparison between cortical bone trajectory fixation and pedicle screw fixation
    Oshino, Hiroki
    Sakakibara, Toshihiko
    Inaba, Tadashi
    Yoshikawa, Takamasa
    Kato, Takaya
    Kasai, Yuichi
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2015, 10