Optimal screw orientation for fixation of coronal shear fractures: a biomechanical comparison

被引:0
|
作者
Lappen, Sebastian [1 ]
Siebenlist, Sebastian [1 ]
Leschinger, Tim [2 ,3 ]
Kadantsev, Pavel [1 ]
Geyer, Stephanie [1 ,4 ]
Wegmann, Kilian [2 ,3 ,5 ]
Mueller, Lars-Peter
Hackl, Michael [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Dept Sports Orthopead, Klinikum Rechts Isar, Ismaninger Str 22, D-81675 Munich, Germany
[2] Univ Cologne, Fac Med, Ctr Orthoped & Trauma Surg, Cologne, Germany
[3] Univ Cologne, Univ Hosp, Ctr Orthoped & Trauma Surg, Cologne, Germany
[4] St Vinzenz Klin, Dept Orthoped, Pfronten, Germany
[5] OCM Orthopad Chirurg Munchen Clin, Munich, Germany
关键词
Capitellum; distal humerus; elbow; fracture fixation; humeral fracture; osteosynthesis; INTERNAL-FIXATION; OPEN REDUCTION; CAPITELLUM;
D O I
10.1016/j.jse.2024.05.007
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Coronal shear fractures of the capitellum are rare injuries which can be challenging to treat. The aim of this study was to compare the biomechanical properties of different internal screw fixation techniques for Dubberley type IA fractures of the capitellum. Methods: In this biomechanical study, Dubberley type IA fractures of the capitellum were created in 30 human fresh-frozen humeri. The specimens were then divided into 3 groups: fixation was either performed with 3 x 3.0 mm headless cannulated compression screws (HCCSs) in anteroposterior (AP) orientation (AP group), 3 x 3.0 mm HCCSs in posteroanterior (PA) orientation (PA group) or with 2 x 3.0 mm HCCSs in PA orientation and 1 x 3.0 mm HCCS in lateral orientation (LAT) group. Displacement under cyclic loading and ultimate load-to-failure were evaluated in all specimens. Results: There was no significant difference in fragment displacement after 2000 cycles between AP and PA groups (0.8 +/- 0.5 mm vs. 0.8 +/- 0.6 mm; P = .987) or PA and LAT groups (0.8 +/- 0.6 mm vs. 0.8 +/- 0.3 mm; P = .966). LAT group showed the highest load-to- failure (548 +/- 250 N) without reaching statistically significant difference to AP group (388 +/- 173 N; P = .101). There was also no significant difference between AP and PA groups (388 +/- 173 N vs. 422 +/- 114 N; P = .649). Conclusions: Variations in screw placement had no statistically significant influence on cyclic displacement or load-to-failure in Dubberley Type IA fractures. However, fracture fixation in 2 planes-both the coronal and the sagittal plane-by adding a screw in a lateral to medial direction may be beneficial to increase primary stability.
引用
收藏
页码:543 / 549
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Biomechanical comparison of five cannulated screw fixation strategies for young vertical femoral neck fractures
    Jiang, Dajun
    Zhan, Shi
    Wang, Lei
    Shi, Lewis L.
    Ling, Ming
    Hu, Hai
    Jia, Weitao
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 2021, 39 (08) : 1669 - 1680
  • [22] Biomechanical comparison of plate-screw and screw fixation in medial tibial plateau fractures (Schatzker 4). A model study
    Cift, H.
    Cetik, O.
    Kalaycioglu, B.
    Dirikoglu, M. H.
    Ozkan, K.
    Eksioglu, F.
    ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2010, 96 (03) : 263 - 267
  • [23] Biomechanical comparison of screw versus screw-plate fixation of type 2 Schatzker fractures of the lateral tibial plateau
    Boisrenoult, P
    Bricteux, S
    Beaufils, P
    Hardy, P
    REVUE DE CHIRURGIE ORTHOPEDIQUE ET REPARATRICE DE L APPAREIL MOTEUR, 2000, 86 (07): : 707 - 711
  • [24] A Biomechanical Comparison of a Novel Thoracic Screw Fixation Method: Transarticular Screw Fixation vs Traditional Pedicle Screw Fixation
    Yu, Yang
    Xie, Ning
    Song, Shaohua
    Zhang, Wei
    Guo, Qunfeng
    Ni, Bin
    Luo, Junsheng
    NEUROSURGERY, 2011, 69 : 141 - 145
  • [25] A New Concept For Screw-In-Screw Fixation Of Fragility Sacrum Fractures - Biomechanical Comparison Versus Transsacral And SI Screw Fixations (8476)
    Zderic, Ivan
    Schopper, Clemens
    Lodde, Moritz
    Wagner, Daniel
    Richards, Geoff
    Gueorguiev, Boyko
    Rommens, Pol
    Acklin, Yves
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2020, : S37 - S38
  • [26] Biomechanical comparison of locking compression plate fixation and a novel pedicle screw external fixation to repair equine mandibular fractures
    Monck, Samantha L.
    McGilvray, Kirk C.
    Easley, Jeremiah T.
    VETERINARY SURGERY, 2020, 49 (05) : 997 - 1006
  • [27] Biomechanical comparison of intramedullary screw fixation, dorsal plating and K-wire fixation for stable metacarpal shaft fractures
    Galbraith, John G.
    Huntington, Lachlan S.
    Borbas, Paul
    Ackland, David C.
    Tham, Stephen K.
    Ek, Eugene T.
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-EUROPEAN VOLUME, 2022, 47 (02) : 172 - 178
  • [28] Biomechanical Comparison of Odontoid Plate Fixation Versus Odontoid Screw Fixation
    Platzer, Patrick
    Eipeldauer, Stefan
    Leitgeb, Johannes
    Aldrian, Silke
    Vecsei, Vilmos
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2011, 24 (03): : 164 - 169
  • [29] Biomechanical comparison of sacral and transarticular sacroiliac screw fixation
    Léo Fradet
    Rohan-Jean Bianco
    Robert Tatsumi
    John Coleman
    Carl-Éric Aubin
    Spine Deformity, 2020, 8 : 853 - 862
  • [30] Biomechanical comparison of sacral and transarticular sacroiliac screw fixation
    Fradet, Leo
    Bianco, Rohan-Jean
    Tatsumi, Robert
    Coleman, John
    Aubin, Carl-Eric
    SPINE DEFORMITY, 2020, 8 (05) : 853 - 862