Si Characterization on Thinning and Singulation Processes for 2.5/3D HBM Package Integration

被引:0
|
作者
Choi, Mikyeong [1 ]
Kim, Seahwan [1 ]
Noh, Taejoon [1 ]
Kang, Donggil [1 ]
Jung, Seungboo [1 ]
机构
[1] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Adv Mat Sci & Engn, 2066 Seobu Ro, Suwon 16419, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
thinning; singulation; FWMH; Si wafer; Raman analysis; 2.5D/3D integration; semiconductor package; FRACTURE STRENGTH; SILICON; STRESS;
D O I
10.3390/ma17225529
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
As stacking technologies, such as 2.5D and 3D packages, continue to accelerate in advanced semiconductor components, the singulation and thinning of Si wafers are becoming increasingly critical. Despite their importance in producing thinner and more reliable Si chips, achieving high reliability remains a challenge, and comprehensive research on the effects of these processing techniques on Si chip integrity is lacking. In this study, the impacts of wafer thinning and singulation on the fracture strength of Si wafers were systematically compared. Three different grinding processes, namely fine grinding, poly-grinding, and polishing, were used for thinning, and the resulting surface morphology and roughness were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy and an interferometer. In addition, the residual mechanical stress on the wafer surface was measured using Raman spectroscopy. The fracture strength of Si wafers and chips was assessed through three-point bending tests. Singulation, including blade dicing, laser dicing, and stealth dicing, was evaluated for its impact on fracture strength. Among these processes, polishing for wafer thinning exhibited the lowest full-width half maximum and intensity ratio of Raman shifts (I480/I520), indicating minimal residual stress and surface defects. Consequently, Si wafers and chips processed through polishing demonstrated the highest fracture strength. Moreover, the 60 mu m thick Si wafers and chips showed the highest fracture strength compared with those with thicknesses of 90 and 120 mu m, possibly because of the increased flexibility, which mitigates stress. Among the singulation methods, stealth dicing yielded the highest fracture strength, outperforming blade and laser dicing. The combination of wafer thinning via polishing and singulation via stealth dicing presents an optimal solution for producing highly reliable Si chips for 2.5D and 3D packaging. These findings may be valuable in selecting optimal processing technologies for high-reliability Si chip production in industrial settings.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Process Characterization Vehicles for 3D Integration
    Campbell, David V.
    2010 PROCEEDINGS 60TH ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS AND TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE (ECTC), 2010, : 1112 - 1116
  • [32] System-in-a-Package Technology for 3D Integration of Radar Modules
    Brebels, S.
    Sun, X.
    Carchon, G.
    Posada, G.
    Dussopt, L.
    Dubois, M. -A.
    Vandenbosch, G.
    De Raedt, W.
    MRRS: 2008 MICROWAVES, RADAR AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, : 112 - +
  • [33] Production-Worthy WOW 3D Integration Technology Using Bumpless Interconnects and Ultra-Thinning Processes
    Ohba, Takayuki
    2016 IEEE SYMPOSIUM ON VLSI TECHNOLOGY, 2016,
  • [34] Silicon-Package Co-Verification for 2.5D/3D Applications
    Felton, Keith
    Ferguson, John
    2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL 3D SYSTEMS INTEGRATION CONFERENCE (3DIC), 2016,
  • [35] Impact of wafer thinning on front-end reliability for 3D integration
    Chasin, Adrian
    Scholz, Mirko
    Guo, Wei
    Franco, Jacopo
    Potoms, Goedele
    Jourdain, Anne
    Linten, Dimitri
    Van der Plas, Geert
    Absil, Philippe
    Beyne, Eric
    2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL RELIABILITY PHYSICS SYMPOSIUM (IRPS), 2016,
  • [36] Process Integration and Testing of TSV Si Interposers for 3D Integration Applications
    Lannon, J., Jr.
    Hilton, A.
    Huffman, A.
    Lueck, M.
    Vick, E.
    Goodwin, S.
    Cunningham, G.
    Malta, D.
    Gregory, C.
    Temple, D.
    2012 IEEE 62ND ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS AND TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE (ECTC), 2012, : 268 - 273
  • [37] Factors in the Selection of Temporary Wafer Handlers for 3D/2.5D Integration
    Dang, Bing
    Webb, Bucknell
    Tsang, Cornelia
    Andry, Paul
    Knickerbocker, John
    2014 IEEE 64TH ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS AND TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE (ECTC), 2014, : 576 - 581
  • [38] Pathfinding Methodology for Optimal Design and Integration of 2.5D/3D Interconnects
    Yazdani, Farhang
    Park, John
    2014 IEEE 64TH ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS AND TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE (ECTC), 2014, : 1667 - 1672
  • [39] Recent Advances and Future Challenges in 2.5D/3D Heterogeneous Integration
    Karnik, Tanay
    ISPD'22: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2022 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON PHYSICAL DESIGN, 2022, : 95 - 95
  • [40] Polylithic Integration of 2.5D and 3D Chiplets Using Interconnect Stitching
    Jo, Paul K.
    Zheng, Ting
    Bakir, Muhannad S.
    2019 IEEE 69TH ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS AND TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE (ECTC), 2019, : 1803 - 1808