Bridging theory and practice: a scoping review protocol on gamification's impact in clinical reasoning education

被引:0
|
作者
Lee, Ching-Yi [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Ching-Hsin [3 ]
Lai, Hung-Yi [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Po-Jui [3 ]
Chen, Mi-Mi [1 ,2 ]
Yau, Sze-Yuen [4 ]
机构
[1] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Linkou Main Branch, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Univ, Coll Med, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[3] Chang Gung Mem Hosp Linkou, Proton & Radiat Therapy Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Linkou, Taiwan
[4] Chang Gung Med Educ Res Ctr, Taoyuan, Taiwan
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2024年 / 14卷 / 12期
关键词
Clinical Reasoning; EDUCATION & TRAINING (see Medical Education & Training); MEDICAL EDUCATION & TRAINING; NURSING-EDUCATION;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086262
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction In the rapidly evolving field of medical education, gamification has emerged as a promising strategy to enhance clinical reasoning skills among healthcare professionals. By incorporating game-like elements into the learning environment, gamification strives to enhance engagement, motivation and knowledge retention. Given the importance of clinical reasoning in medical decision-making and patient care, this scoping review protocol aims to systematically explore developments, implementations and outcomes of gamification in clinical reasoning education. Methods and analysis The scoping review will follow the Arksey and O'Malley methodological framework, enhanced by guidelines from the Joanna Briggs Institute. We will search four major databases: OVID Medline, Scopus and Web of Science using key terms such as "gamification," "clinical reasoning," and "medical education". Studies will be selected based on the participants, concepts and contexts (PCC) framework, focusing on literature published in English. Two independent reviewers will screen studies and extract data on gamification elements used in clinical reasoning education. Any disagreement between the reviewers will be resolved by consulting a third person. We will provide a narrative synthesis of the findings, highlighting the variety of gamified strategies and their effects on clinical reasoning skills. This review will also map out gaps in the current literature and provide direction for future research. Ethics and dissemination The scoping review, which aggregates and synthesises publicly available studies, does not require ethics approval due to its nature as a compilation of existing research. The reporting of findings will adhere to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist, promoting both thoroughness and transparency in our analysis. Our dissemination plan encompasses publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presentations at academic conferences focused on medical education. This strategy is designed to engage educators, curriculum designers and policymakers within the sector, ensuring our insights reach those who can apply them most effectively.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Bridging the Theory and Practice Gap in Marketing Education
    Patricio, Rui
    CSEDU: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 14TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SUPPORTED EDUCATION - VOL 2, 2022, : 498 - 505
  • [42] Postgraduate anaesthesiology education: protocol for a scoping review
    Ringsted, Charlotte
    Bance, Sheena
    Murgaski, Laura Leigh
    Herold, Jodi
    Takahashi, Susan Glover
    BMJ OPEN, 2014, 4 (05):
  • [43] Transition into distance education: A scoping review protocol
    Schweighart, Roxana
    Hast, Michael
    Trautwein, Caroline
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (02):
  • [44] Sustainability of Interprofessional Education: Protocol for a Scoping Review
    de Oliveira, Nathalia Hanany Silva
    de Oliveira, Renata Fonseca Sousa
    Soares, Juliana Pontes
    de Castro, Janete Lima
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2024, 13
  • [45] Fatty Degenerative Osteonecrosis of the Jaw: Bridging Molecular Insights and Clinical Practice-A Scoping Review
    Dominiak, Marzena
    Niemczyk, Wojciech
    Pitulaj, Artur
    Swienc, Witold
    Matys, Jacek
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2025, 26 (05)
  • [46] Impact of clinical supervision on the mental health nursing workforce: a scoping review protocol
    McDonough, Joshua Henry
    Rhodes, Kate
    Procter, Nicholas
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (03):
  • [47] Learning Clinical Reasoning in Forensic Medicine: A Scoping Review
    Abouzahir, Hind
    Belhouss, Ahmed
    Benyaich, Hicham
    MEDICAL SCIENCE EDUCATOR, 2024, 34 (03) : 695 - 703
  • [48] A Scoping Review of Physicians' Clinical Reasoning in Emergency Departments
    Pelaccia, Thierry
    Plotnick, Laurie H.
    Audetat, Marie-Claude
    Nendaz, Mathieu
    Lubarsky, Stuart
    Torabi, Nazi
    Thomas, Aliki
    Young, Meredith
    Dory, Valerie
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2020, 75 (02) : 206 - 217
  • [49] Education of clinical reasoning in patients with multimorbidity: a scoping review and perspectives for technology-enhanced learning
    Consorti, Fabrizio
    Borcea, Maria Carola
    Laca, Angelo
    Melcarne, Rossella
    Scorziello, Chiara
    Ventrone, Luca
    Giacomelli, Laura
    FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION, 2023, 8
  • [50] The medical librarian's roles in the patient education process: A scoping review protocol
    Amini, Faezeh
    Ashrafi-rizi, Hasan
    Khorasani, Parvaneh
    Hashemian, Mohammadreza
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATION AND HEALTH PROMOTION, 2024, 13 (01)