Bridging theory and practice: a scoping review protocol on gamification's impact in clinical reasoning education

被引:0
|
作者
Lee, Ching-Yi [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Ching-Hsin [3 ]
Lai, Hung-Yi [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Po-Jui [3 ]
Chen, Mi-Mi [1 ,2 ]
Yau, Sze-Yuen [4 ]
机构
[1] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Linkou Main Branch, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Univ, Coll Med, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[3] Chang Gung Mem Hosp Linkou, Proton & Radiat Therapy Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Linkou, Taiwan
[4] Chang Gung Med Educ Res Ctr, Taoyuan, Taiwan
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2024年 / 14卷 / 12期
关键词
Clinical Reasoning; EDUCATION & TRAINING (see Medical Education & Training); MEDICAL EDUCATION & TRAINING; NURSING-EDUCATION;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086262
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction In the rapidly evolving field of medical education, gamification has emerged as a promising strategy to enhance clinical reasoning skills among healthcare professionals. By incorporating game-like elements into the learning environment, gamification strives to enhance engagement, motivation and knowledge retention. Given the importance of clinical reasoning in medical decision-making and patient care, this scoping review protocol aims to systematically explore developments, implementations and outcomes of gamification in clinical reasoning education. Methods and analysis The scoping review will follow the Arksey and O'Malley methodological framework, enhanced by guidelines from the Joanna Briggs Institute. We will search four major databases: OVID Medline, Scopus and Web of Science using key terms such as "gamification," "clinical reasoning," and "medical education". Studies will be selected based on the participants, concepts and contexts (PCC) framework, focusing on literature published in English. Two independent reviewers will screen studies and extract data on gamification elements used in clinical reasoning education. Any disagreement between the reviewers will be resolved by consulting a third person. We will provide a narrative synthesis of the findings, highlighting the variety of gamified strategies and their effects on clinical reasoning skills. This review will also map out gaps in the current literature and provide direction for future research. Ethics and dissemination The scoping review, which aggregates and synthesises publicly available studies, does not require ethics approval due to its nature as a compilation of existing research. The reporting of findings will adhere to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist, promoting both thoroughness and transparency in our analysis. Our dissemination plan encompasses publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presentations at academic conferences focused on medical education. This strategy is designed to engage educators, curriculum designers and policymakers within the sector, ensuring our insights reach those who can apply them most effectively.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Clinical Reasoning Curricula in Preclinical Undergraduate Medical Education: A Scoping Review
    Hawks, Matthew K.
    Maciuba, Joseph M.
    Merkebu, Jerusalem
    Durning, Steven J.
    Mallory, Renee
    Arnold, Michael J.
    Torre, Dario
    Soh, Michael
    ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2023, 98 (08) : 958 - 965
  • [12] Clinical interprofessional education in the health professions: a scoping review protocol
    Moote, Rebecca
    Ratcliffe, Temple
    Gaspard, Christine
    Kennedy, Angela
    Leach, Elena Riccio
    Vives, Marta
    Zorek, Joseph A.
    JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2022, 20 (03) : 931 - 943
  • [13] Influence of societal and practice contexts on health professionals' clinical reasoning: a scoping study protocol
    Carrier, Annie
    Levasseur, Melanie
    Freeman, Andrew
    Mullins, Gary
    Quenec'hdu, Suzanne
    Lalonde, Louise
    Gagnon, Michael
    Lacasse, Francis
    BMJ OPEN, 2013, 3 (04):
  • [14] Application of Gamification Teaching in Disaster Education: Scoping Review
    Bai, Shiyi
    Zeng, Huijuan
    Zhong, Qianmei
    Shen, Yuqi
    Cao, Lulu
    He, Mei
    JMIR SERIOUS GAMES, 2024, 12
  • [15] Capability as a concept in advanced practice nursing and education: a scoping review protocol
    Whitfield, Martha M.
    Bleah, Paulina
    Bachynski, Jovina Concepcion
    Macdonald, Danielle
    Klein, Tracy
    Ross-White, Amanda
    Wilson, Rosemary
    JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2022, 20 (08) : 2079 - 2086
  • [16] High-Fidelity Simulation's Impact on Clinical Reasoning and Patient Safety: A Scoping Review
    El Hussein, Mohamed Toufic
    Hirst, Sandra P.
    JOURNAL OF NURSING REGULATION, 2023, 13 (04) : 54 - 65
  • [17] Characteristics and processes of registered nurses' clinical reasoning and factors relating to the use of clinical reasoning in practice: a scoping review
    Griffits, Susan
    Hines, Sonia
    Moloney, Clint
    JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2023, 21 (04) : 713 - 743
  • [18] Collaborative clinical reasoning: a scoping review
    Lee, Ching-Yi
    Lai, Hung-Yi
    Lee, Ching-Hsin
    Chen, Mi-Mi
    Yau, Sze -Yuen
    PEERJ, 2024, 12
  • [19] Clinical reasoning by pharmacists: A scoping review
    Mertens, Josephine F.
    Koster, Ellen S.
    Deneer, Vera H. M.
    Bouvy, Marcel L.
    van Gelder, Teun
    CURRENTS IN PHARMACY TEACHING AND LEARNING, 2022, 14 (10) : 1326 - 1336
  • [20] Racial biases in clinical practice and medical education: a scoping review
    Mouhab, Adil
    Radjack, Rahmeth
    Moro, Marie Rose
    Lambert, Mathilde
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2024, 24 (01)