Bridging theory and practice: a scoping review protocol on gamification's impact in clinical reasoning education

被引:0
|
作者
Lee, Ching-Yi [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Ching-Hsin [3 ]
Lai, Hung-Yi [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Po-Jui [3 ]
Chen, Mi-Mi [1 ,2 ]
Yau, Sze-Yuen [4 ]
机构
[1] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Linkou Main Branch, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Univ, Coll Med, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[3] Chang Gung Mem Hosp Linkou, Proton & Radiat Therapy Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Linkou, Taiwan
[4] Chang Gung Med Educ Res Ctr, Taoyuan, Taiwan
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2024年 / 14卷 / 12期
关键词
Clinical Reasoning; EDUCATION & TRAINING (see Medical Education & Training); MEDICAL EDUCATION & TRAINING; NURSING-EDUCATION;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086262
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction In the rapidly evolving field of medical education, gamification has emerged as a promising strategy to enhance clinical reasoning skills among healthcare professionals. By incorporating game-like elements into the learning environment, gamification strives to enhance engagement, motivation and knowledge retention. Given the importance of clinical reasoning in medical decision-making and patient care, this scoping review protocol aims to systematically explore developments, implementations and outcomes of gamification in clinical reasoning education. Methods and analysis The scoping review will follow the Arksey and O'Malley methodological framework, enhanced by guidelines from the Joanna Briggs Institute. We will search four major databases: OVID Medline, Scopus and Web of Science using key terms such as "gamification," "clinical reasoning," and "medical education". Studies will be selected based on the participants, concepts and contexts (PCC) framework, focusing on literature published in English. Two independent reviewers will screen studies and extract data on gamification elements used in clinical reasoning education. Any disagreement between the reviewers will be resolved by consulting a third person. We will provide a narrative synthesis of the findings, highlighting the variety of gamified strategies and their effects on clinical reasoning skills. This review will also map out gaps in the current literature and provide direction for future research. Ethics and dissemination The scoping review, which aggregates and synthesises publicly available studies, does not require ethics approval due to its nature as a compilation of existing research. The reporting of findings will adhere to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist, promoting both thoroughness and transparency in our analysis. Our dissemination plan encompasses publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presentations at academic conferences focused on medical education. This strategy is designed to engage educators, curriculum designers and policymakers within the sector, ensuring our insights reach those who can apply them most effectively.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Clinical education models in rural practice settings: A scoping review
    Patterson, Erin
    Plunkett, Robyn
    Goldsmith-Milne, Danya
    NURSE EDUCATION IN PRACTICE, 2024, 75
  • [22] Nurses' and midwives' experiences of clinical supervision in practice: a scoping review protocol
    Gill-Meeley, Nicola
    Hernon, Orlaith
    Cuddihy, Ciaran
    Frawley, Timothy
    Smyth, Siobhan
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (05): : 1 - 4
  • [23] Protocol for a scoping review on the conceptualisation of learning in undergraduate clinical nursing practice
    Stoffels, Malou
    Peerdeman, Saskia M.
    Daelmans, Hester E. M.
    Ket, Johannes C. F.
    Kusurkar, Rashmi A.
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (02):
  • [24] Games to support teaching clinical reasoning in health professions education: a scoping review
    Koelewijn, Gilbert
    Hennus, Marije P.
    Kort, Helianthe S. M.
    Frenkel, Joost
    van Houwelingen, Thijs
    MEDICAL EDUCATION ONLINE, 2024, 29 (01):
  • [25] Osteopathic education: A scoping review protocol
    MacMillan, A.
    Draper-Rodi, Jerry
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE, 2023, 47
  • [26] Reported outcomes and characteristics of objective structured clinical examinations in advanced practice nursing education: a scoping review protocol
    Strobehn, Patricia K.
    Zabriskie, Denise
    Chung, Catherine E.
    Mazzia, Faye
    Mecham, Kelly
    JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2022, 20 (05) : 1324 - 1329
  • [27] Scoping review: Diagnostic reasoning as a component of clinical reasoning in the US primary care nurse practitioner education
    Smith, Sheila K.
    Benbenek, Mary M.
    Bakker, Caitlin J.
    Bockwoldt, Denise
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2022, 78 (12) : 3869 - 3896
  • [28] Transformation and Articulation of Clinical Data to Understand Students' and Health Professionals' Clinical Reasoning: Protocol for a Scoping Review
    Deschenes, Marie-France
    Fernandez, Nicolas
    Lechasseur, Kathleen
    Caty, Marie-Eve
    Azimzadeh, Dina
    Mai, Tue-Chieu
    Lavoie, Patrick
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2023, 12
  • [29] Academic-practice partnerships in evidence-based nursing education: Protocol of a theory-guided scoping review*
    Wang, Guiyun
    Xia, Yuting
    Halili, Xirongguli
    Tang, Siyuan
    Chen, Qirong
    NURSE EDUCATION IN PRACTICE, 2023, 69
  • [30] Congenital colour vision deficiency in healthcare professionals: a scoping review protocol of the impact on clinical practice and patient safety
    Lawson, Euan
    Khan, Aqib
    Wessels, Quenton
    Taylor, Adam M.
    BMJ OPEN, 2025, 15 (01):