Bridging theory and practice: a scoping review protocol on gamification's impact in clinical reasoning education

被引:0
|
作者
Lee, Ching-Yi [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Ching-Hsin [3 ]
Lai, Hung-Yi [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Po-Jui [3 ]
Chen, Mi-Mi [1 ,2 ]
Yau, Sze-Yuen [4 ]
机构
[1] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Linkou Main Branch, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Univ, Coll Med, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[3] Chang Gung Mem Hosp Linkou, Proton & Radiat Therapy Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Linkou, Taiwan
[4] Chang Gung Med Educ Res Ctr, Taoyuan, Taiwan
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2024年 / 14卷 / 12期
关键词
Clinical Reasoning; EDUCATION & TRAINING (see Medical Education & Training); MEDICAL EDUCATION & TRAINING; NURSING-EDUCATION;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086262
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction In the rapidly evolving field of medical education, gamification has emerged as a promising strategy to enhance clinical reasoning skills among healthcare professionals. By incorporating game-like elements into the learning environment, gamification strives to enhance engagement, motivation and knowledge retention. Given the importance of clinical reasoning in medical decision-making and patient care, this scoping review protocol aims to systematically explore developments, implementations and outcomes of gamification in clinical reasoning education. Methods and analysis The scoping review will follow the Arksey and O'Malley methodological framework, enhanced by guidelines from the Joanna Briggs Institute. We will search four major databases: OVID Medline, Scopus and Web of Science using key terms such as "gamification," "clinical reasoning," and "medical education". Studies will be selected based on the participants, concepts and contexts (PCC) framework, focusing on literature published in English. Two independent reviewers will screen studies and extract data on gamification elements used in clinical reasoning education. Any disagreement between the reviewers will be resolved by consulting a third person. We will provide a narrative synthesis of the findings, highlighting the variety of gamified strategies and their effects on clinical reasoning skills. This review will also map out gaps in the current literature and provide direction for future research. Ethics and dissemination The scoping review, which aggregates and synthesises publicly available studies, does not require ethics approval due to its nature as a compilation of existing research. The reporting of findings will adhere to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist, promoting both thoroughness and transparency in our analysis. Our dissemination plan encompasses publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presentations at academic conferences focused on medical education. This strategy is designed to engage educators, curriculum designers and policymakers within the sector, ensuring our insights reach those who can apply them most effectively.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Bridging medical education and clinical practice
    Cork, Nick
    Llewellyn, Oliver
    Glasbey, James
    Khatri, Chetan
    LANCET, 2014, 384 (9954): : 1575 - 1575
  • [32] Evidence-Based Practice in Clinical Nursing Education: A Scoping Review
    Fiset, Valerie J.
    Graham, Ian D.
    Davies, Barbara L.
    JOURNAL OF NURSING EDUCATION, 2017, 56 (09) : 534 - +
  • [33] Education interventions and emergency nurses' clinical practice behaviours: A scoping review
    Considine, Julie
    Shaban, Ramon Z.
    Fry, Margaret
    Curtis, Kate
    AUSTRALASIAN EMERGENCY CARE, 2024, 27 (02) : 119 - 135
  • [34] Simulated practice in the development of clinical reasoning in nursing students: A systematic review protocol ☆ , ☆☆
    Pires, Rute
    Marques, Maria
    Oliveira, Henrique
    Goes, Margarida
    Pedrosa, Miguel
    Lopes, Manuel
    METHODSX, 2025, 14
  • [35] Reflection in the training of general practitioners in clinical practice settings: a scoping review protocol
    Scheel, Linda Schumann
    Kjaer, Niels Kristian
    Marnie, Casey
    Peters, Micah D. J.
    JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2023, 21 (07) : 1501 - 1508
  • [36] Patient and public involvement in the development of clinical practice guidelines: a scoping review protocol
    Bryant, Elizabeth Ann
    Scott, Anna Mae
    Thomas, Rae
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (10):
  • [37] Factors influencing suicide risk assessment clinical practice: protocol for a scoping review
    Sequeira, Lydia
    Strudwick, Gillian
    Bailey, Sharon M.
    De Luca, Vincenzo
    Wiljer, David
    Strauss, John
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (02):
  • [38] Characterising the evidence base for advanced clinical practice in the UK: a scoping review protocol
    Evans, Catrin
    Poku, Brenda
    Pearce, Ruth
    Eldridge, Jeanette
    Hendrick, Paul
    Knaggs, Roger
    McLuskey, John
    Tomczak, Philippa
    Thow, Ruaridh
    Harris, Peter
    Conway, Joy
    Collier, Richard
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (05):
  • [39] Clinical pragmatism: Bridging theory and practice
    Fins, JJ
    Miller, FG
    Bacchetta, MD
    KENNEDY INSTITUTE OF ETHICS JOURNAL, 1998, 8 (01) : 37 - 42
  • [40] Nodding syndrome: bridging the gap-a scoping review protocol
    De Castro, Ana Cristina
    Ortega-Deballon, Ivan
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (10):