Towards sustainable agroecosystems: A life cycle assessment review of soil-biodegradable and traditional plastic mulch films

被引:0
|
作者
Dada, Oluwatunmise Israel [1 ]
Liyanage, Teshan Udayanga Habarakada [1 ]
Chi, Ting [2 ]
Yu, Liang [3 ]
Devetter, Lisa Wasko [4 ]
Chen, Shulin [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington State Univ, Dept Biol Syst Engn, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
[2] Washington State Univ, Dept Apparel Merchandising Design & Text, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
[3] Kentucky State Univ, Sch Engn & Technol, Dept Agr & Biol Engn, Frankfort, KY 40601 USA
[4] Washington State Univ, Northwestern Washington Res & Extens Ctr, Dept Hort, Mt Vernon, WA 98273 USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
Polyethylene mulch; End-of-life; Recycling; Ecotoxicity; Climate change; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; NONRENEWABLE ENERGY USE; AMINE LIGHT STABILIZER; IMPACT ASSESSMENT; LANDFILL SITES; POLYETHYLENE; WASTE; WHEAT; ALTERNATIVES; AGRICULTURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ese.2025.100541
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The increasing use of traditional agricultural plastic mulch films (PMs) has raised significant environmental concerns, prompting the search for sustainable alternatives. Soil-biodegradable mulch films (BDMs) are often proposed as eco-friendly replacements; however, their widespread adoption remains contentious. This review employs a comparative life cycle assessment perspective to evaluate the environmental impact of PMs and BDMs across their production, use, and end-of-life stages, providing strategies to mitigate their impact on agroecosystems. BDMs generally exhibit lower energy use and greenhouse gas emissions than PMs but contribute to greater land-use demands. Reported eutrophication and acidification potentials are less consistent, varying based on feedstock types and the scope of assessment of BDM, as well as the end-of-life management of PM. The environmental burden of both mulch types is influenced by the life cycle stage, polymer composition, farming practices, additives, film thickness, and local climatic conditions. The manufacturing stage is a major contributor to energy use and greenhouse gas emissions for both PMs and BDMs, despite their shared benefits of increasing crop yields. However, post-use impacts are more pronounced for PMs, driven by end-of-life strategy and adsorbed waste content. While starch-based BDMs offer a more sustainable alternative to PMs, uncertainties regarding the residence time of BDM residues in soil (albeit shorter than PM residues) and their effects on soil health, coupled with higher production costs, impede widespread adoption. For BDM end-of-life, soil biodegradation is recommended. Energy and material recovery options are crucial for PM end-of-life, with mechanical recycling preferred, although it requires addressing eutrophication and human toxicity. This review discusses these complexities within specific contexts and provides actionable insights to guide the sustainable integration of mulch films into agricultural practices. (c) 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Chinese Society for Environmental Sciences, Harbin Institute of Technology, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Life cycle assessment of traditional and alternative bricks: A review
    Ramos Huarachi, Diego Alexis
    Goncalves, Giovanna
    de Francisco, Antonio Carlos
    Giovanetti Canteri, Maria Helene
    Piekarski, Cassiano Moro
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2020, 80
  • [22] Application of life cycle thinking towards sustainable cities: A review
    Petit-Boix, Anna
    Llorach-Massana, Pere
    Sanjuan-Delmas, David
    Sierra-Perez, Jorge
    Vinyes, Elisabet
    Gabarrell, Xavier
    Rieradevall, Joan
    Sanye-Mengual, Esther
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 166 : 939 - 951
  • [23] Soil quality in Life Cycle Assessment: Towards development of an indicator
    Garrigues, Emmanuelle
    Corson, Michael S.
    Angers, Denis A.
    van der Werf, Hayo M. G.
    Walter, Christian
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2012, 18 : 434 - 442
  • [24] A review evaluating the gaps in plastic impacts in life cycle assessment
    Sabate, Kealohi
    Kendall, Alissa
    CLEANER ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, 2024, 14
  • [25] Enhanced end-of-life performance for biodegradable plastic mulch films through improving standards and addressing research gaps
    Hayes, Douglas G.
    CURRENT OPINION IN CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 33
  • [26] Towards sustainable production of sesame products: Comparison of traditional and modern production systems via a life cycle assessment approach
    Fereidani, Bahar M.
    Uctug, Fehmi Gorkem
    CLEANER AND RESPONSIBLE CONSUMPTION, 2024, 12
  • [27] Life Cycle Management and Assessment: Approaches and visions towards sustainable manufacturing
    Westkamper, Engelbert
    Alting, Leo
    Arndt, Gunter
    CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology, 2000, 49 (02) : 501 - 526
  • [28] Towards sustainable business models with a novel life cycle assessment method
    Goffetti, Giulia
    Bockin, Daniel
    Baumann, Henrikke
    Tillman, Anne-Marie
    Zobel, Thomas
    BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 31 (05) : 2019 - 2035
  • [29] Life cycle management and assessment:: Approaches and visions towards sustainable manufacturing
    Westkämper, E
    Alting, L
    Arndt, G
    CIRP ANNALS 2000: MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, VOL 49/2/2000, 2000, : 501 - 522
  • [30] Life cycle management and assessment:: approaches and visions towards sustainable manufacturing
    Westkämper, E
    Alting, L
    Arndt, G
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART B-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MANUFACTURE, 2001, 215 (05) : 599 - 626