Towards sustainable agroecosystems: A life cycle assessment review of soil-biodegradable and traditional plastic mulch films

被引:0
|
作者
Dada, Oluwatunmise Israel [1 ]
Liyanage, Teshan Udayanga Habarakada [1 ]
Chi, Ting [2 ]
Yu, Liang [3 ]
Devetter, Lisa Wasko [4 ]
Chen, Shulin [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington State Univ, Dept Biol Syst Engn, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
[2] Washington State Univ, Dept Apparel Merchandising Design & Text, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
[3] Kentucky State Univ, Sch Engn & Technol, Dept Agr & Biol Engn, Frankfort, KY 40601 USA
[4] Washington State Univ, Northwestern Washington Res & Extens Ctr, Dept Hort, Mt Vernon, WA 98273 USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
Polyethylene mulch; End-of-life; Recycling; Ecotoxicity; Climate change; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; NONRENEWABLE ENERGY USE; AMINE LIGHT STABILIZER; IMPACT ASSESSMENT; LANDFILL SITES; POLYETHYLENE; WASTE; WHEAT; ALTERNATIVES; AGRICULTURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ese.2025.100541
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The increasing use of traditional agricultural plastic mulch films (PMs) has raised significant environmental concerns, prompting the search for sustainable alternatives. Soil-biodegradable mulch films (BDMs) are often proposed as eco-friendly replacements; however, their widespread adoption remains contentious. This review employs a comparative life cycle assessment perspective to evaluate the environmental impact of PMs and BDMs across their production, use, and end-of-life stages, providing strategies to mitigate their impact on agroecosystems. BDMs generally exhibit lower energy use and greenhouse gas emissions than PMs but contribute to greater land-use demands. Reported eutrophication and acidification potentials are less consistent, varying based on feedstock types and the scope of assessment of BDM, as well as the end-of-life management of PM. The environmental burden of both mulch types is influenced by the life cycle stage, polymer composition, farming practices, additives, film thickness, and local climatic conditions. The manufacturing stage is a major contributor to energy use and greenhouse gas emissions for both PMs and BDMs, despite their shared benefits of increasing crop yields. However, post-use impacts are more pronounced for PMs, driven by end-of-life strategy and adsorbed waste content. While starch-based BDMs offer a more sustainable alternative to PMs, uncertainties regarding the residence time of BDM residues in soil (albeit shorter than PM residues) and their effects on soil health, coupled with higher production costs, impede widespread adoption. For BDM end-of-life, soil biodegradation is recommended. Energy and material recovery options are crucial for PM end-of-life, with mechanical recycling preferred, although it requires addressing eutrophication and human toxicity. This review discusses these complexities within specific contexts and provides actionable insights to guide the sustainable integration of mulch films into agricultural practices. (c) 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Chinese Society for Environmental Sciences, Harbin Institute of Technology, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Sustainable Manufacturing Assessment: Approach and the Trend Towards Life Cycle Sustainability Analysis
    Gbededo, Mijoh
    Liyanage, Kapila
    ADVANCES IN MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY XXXI, 2017, 6 : 383 - 388
  • [42] Towards sustainable chemical process design: Revisiting the integration of life cycle assessment
    Lowgren, Bartolomeus Haussling
    Hoffmann, Christian
    Vijver, Martina G.
    Steubing, Bernhard
    Cardellini, Giuseppe
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2025, 491
  • [43] Moving Towards Sustainable Germanium Sourcing Evaluated by Means of Life Cycle Assessment
    Van Hoof, Gert
    Schurmans, Maarten
    Robertz, Benedicte
    Menard, Jean-Francois
    Dessein, Kristof
    JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE METALLURGY, 2020, 6 (02) : 333 - 343
  • [44] Comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Traditional and New Sustainable Wind Blade Construction
    Carallo, Gloria Anna
    Casa, Marcello
    Kelly, Conor
    Alsaadi, Mohamad
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2025, 17 (05)
  • [45] Plastic Solid Waste (PSW) in the Context of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Sustainable Management
    Ana Antelava
    Spyridon Damilos
    Sanaa Hafeez
    George Manos
    Sultan M. Al-Salem
    Brajendra K. Sharma
    Kirtika Kohli
    Achilleas Constantinou
    Environmental Management, 2019, 64 : 230 - 244
  • [46] Plastic Solid Waste (PSW) in the Context of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Sustainable Management
    Antelava, Ana
    Damilos, Spyridon
    Hafeez, Sanaa
    Manos, George
    Al-Salem, Sultan M.
    Sharma, Brajendra K.
    Kohli, Kirtika
    Constantinou, Achilleas
    ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 64 (02) : 230 - 244
  • [47] Multi-Life Cycle Assessment for sustainable products: A systematic review
    Suhariyanto, T. T.
    Wahab, D. A.
    Rahman, M. N. Ab.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 165 : 677 - 696
  • [48] Integrated Life Cycle Assessment for Sustainable Remediation of Contaminated Agricultural Soil in China
    Jin, Yuanliang
    Wang, Liuwei
    Song, Yinan
    Zhu, Jin
    Qin, Muhan
    Wu, Longhua
    Hu, Pengjie
    Li, Fangbai
    Fang, Liping
    Chen, Chang
    Hou, Deyi
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 55 (17) : 12032 - 12042
  • [49] Towards a Life Cycle Sustainability Analysis: A systematic review of approaches to sustainable manufacturing
    Gbededo, Mijoh A.
    Liyanage, Kapila
    Garza-Reyes, Jose Arturo
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 184 : 1002 - 1015
  • [50] Closing plastic loop with CCUS: Life cycle assessment of a novel strategy for plastic sustainable transition and negative emissions
    Huang, Zhixin
    Deng, Shuai
    Zhang, Qi
    Zhao, Ruikai
    Li, Shuangjun
    Veselovskaya, Janna
    Kozlov, Denis
    Wang, Junyao
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2024, 208