Towards sustainable agroecosystems: A life cycle assessment review of soil-biodegradable and traditional plastic mulch films

被引:0
|
作者
Dada, Oluwatunmise Israel [1 ]
Liyanage, Teshan Udayanga Habarakada [1 ]
Chi, Ting [2 ]
Yu, Liang [3 ]
Devetter, Lisa Wasko [4 ]
Chen, Shulin [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington State Univ, Dept Biol Syst Engn, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
[2] Washington State Univ, Dept Apparel Merchandising Design & Text, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
[3] Kentucky State Univ, Sch Engn & Technol, Dept Agr & Biol Engn, Frankfort, KY 40601 USA
[4] Washington State Univ, Northwestern Washington Res & Extens Ctr, Dept Hort, Mt Vernon, WA 98273 USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
Polyethylene mulch; End-of-life; Recycling; Ecotoxicity; Climate change; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; NONRENEWABLE ENERGY USE; AMINE LIGHT STABILIZER; IMPACT ASSESSMENT; LANDFILL SITES; POLYETHYLENE; WASTE; WHEAT; ALTERNATIVES; AGRICULTURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ese.2025.100541
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The increasing use of traditional agricultural plastic mulch films (PMs) has raised significant environmental concerns, prompting the search for sustainable alternatives. Soil-biodegradable mulch films (BDMs) are often proposed as eco-friendly replacements; however, their widespread adoption remains contentious. This review employs a comparative life cycle assessment perspective to evaluate the environmental impact of PMs and BDMs across their production, use, and end-of-life stages, providing strategies to mitigate their impact on agroecosystems. BDMs generally exhibit lower energy use and greenhouse gas emissions than PMs but contribute to greater land-use demands. Reported eutrophication and acidification potentials are less consistent, varying based on feedstock types and the scope of assessment of BDM, as well as the end-of-life management of PM. The environmental burden of both mulch types is influenced by the life cycle stage, polymer composition, farming practices, additives, film thickness, and local climatic conditions. The manufacturing stage is a major contributor to energy use and greenhouse gas emissions for both PMs and BDMs, despite their shared benefits of increasing crop yields. However, post-use impacts are more pronounced for PMs, driven by end-of-life strategy and adsorbed waste content. While starch-based BDMs offer a more sustainable alternative to PMs, uncertainties regarding the residence time of BDM residues in soil (albeit shorter than PM residues) and their effects on soil health, coupled with higher production costs, impede widespread adoption. For BDM end-of-life, soil biodegradation is recommended. Energy and material recovery options are crucial for PM end-of-life, with mechanical recycling preferred, although it requires addressing eutrophication and human toxicity. This review discusses these complexities within specific contexts and provides actionable insights to guide the sustainable integration of mulch films into agricultural practices. (c) 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Chinese Society for Environmental Sciences, Harbin Institute of Technology, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] How sustainable are the biodegradable medical gowns via environmental and social life cycle assessment?
    Zhao, Xiang
    Klemes, Jiri Jaromir
    Saxon, Michael
    You, Fengqi
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 380
  • [32] Application of Life Cycle Assessment for More Sustainable Plastic Packaging - Challenges and Opportunities
    Merschak, Simon
    Kneidinger, Christian
    Katzmayr, David
    Casata, Johanna
    Hehenberger, Peter
    PRODUCT LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT: LEVERAGING DIGITAL TWINS, CIRCULAR ECONOMY, AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT FOR SUSTAINABLE INNOVATION, PT II, PLM 2023, 2024, 702 : 61 - 71
  • [33] Life cycle assessment of biochar for sustainable agricultural application: A review
    Li, Jiao
    Sun, Wenhui
    Lichtfouse, Eric
    Maurer, Claudia
    Liu, Hongbo
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 951
  • [34] A review on sustainable production of graphene and related life cycle assessment
    Munuera, J.
    Britnell, L.
    Santoro, C.
    Cuellar-Franca, R.
    Casiraghi, C.
    2D MATERIALS, 2022, 9 (01)
  • [35] Plastic Waste Management: A Review of Existing Life Cycle Assessment Studies
    Alhazmi, Hatem
    Almansour, Faris H.
    Aldhafeeri, Zaid
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (10)
  • [36] Wooden and Plastic Pallets: A Review of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Studies
    Deviatkin, Ivan
    Khan, Musharof
    Ernst, Elizabeth
    Horttanainen, Mika
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (20)
  • [37] Comparative Life Cycle Assessment in the plastic sector: A systematic literature review
    Marson, Alessandro
    Piron, Mirco
    Zuliani, Filippo
    Fedele, Andrea
    Manzardo, Alessandro
    CLEANER ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, 2023, 9
  • [38] Straw Return with Biodegradable Film Mulch: A Synergistic Cultivation Measure with Environmental and Economic Benefits Based on Life Cycle Assessment
    Chen, Qian
    Zhang, Xiaoni
    Zhao, Yongqiang
    Zhang, Qian
    Sun, Hongwu
    Hu, Naijuan
    Zhu, Liqun
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2024, 14 (12):
  • [39] Life cycle assessment of biochar-to-soil systems: A review
    Matustik, Jan
    Hnatkova, Tereza
    Koci, Vladimir
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 259
  • [40] Moving Towards Sustainable Germanium Sourcing Evaluated by Means of Life Cycle Assessment
    Gert Van Hoof
    Maarten Schurmans
    Bénédicte Robertz
    Jean-François Ménard
    Kristof Dessein
    Journal of Sustainable Metallurgy, 2020, 6 : 333 - 343