A Retrospective Study of Pediatric Allergic Contact Dermatitis from 2017-2022

被引:0
|
作者
Pixley, Jessica N. [1 ]
Kontzias, Christina [1 ]
Tao, Rachel E. [1 ]
Massey, Lauren [2 ]
Mcpeeks, Kimberly [1 ]
Neighbors, Katherine [2 ]
Srivastava, Radhika [1 ]
Feldman, Steven R. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Burkhart, Craig [2 ]
机构
[1] Wake Forest Univ, Bowman Gray Sch Med, Dept Dermatol, 4618 Country Club Rd, Winston Salem, NC 27104 USA
[2] Burkhart Pediat & Adolescent Dermatol, Cary, NC USA
[3] Wake Forest Univ, Bowman Gray Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Winston Salem, NC 27104 USA
[4] Wake Forest Univ, Bowman Gray Sch Med, Dept Social Sci & Hlth Policy, Winston Salem, NC 27104 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Dermatology; Pediatrics; Allergic contact dermatitis; SERIES;
D O I
10.1007/s13555-024-01314-w
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
ObjectivesAllergic contact dermatitis occurs frequently in children. The proportion of children of color in the US is increasing, and racial and ethnic minority representation is important in pediatric allergic contact dermatitis research. The objectives of our study were to identify differences in age, sex, race and ethnicity among pediatric patch tests obtained from 2017 to 2022.MethodsA total of 792 pediatric patients were evaluated, and patch test differences were analyzed among age, sex, race and ethnicity groups.ResultsChildren in the age group 0-5 years had the highest number of positive reactions, and propolis was the most frequent allergen among females and in children in the age groups 6-11 years and 12-18 years. Carmine was the most frequent allergen among males and among children in the age group 1-5 years. Risk of sensitivity to multiple allergens varied with race and ethnicity.ConclusionsThe risk of patch test positivity to multiple allergens varied within the demographic groups evaluated. The etiology of these differences is likely multi-factorial and includes differences in exposure patterns and disparities in access.
引用
收藏
页码:445 / 452
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Allergic contact dermatitis from octylisothiazolinone
    Mose, Anja P.
    Frost, Simon
    Ohlund, Ulf
    Andersen, Klaus E.
    CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2013, 69 (01) : 49 - 52
  • [42] Allergic contact dermatitis from methyldibromoglutaronitrile
    Bruze, M
    Gruvberger, B
    Goossens, A
    Hindsén, M
    Pontén, A
    DERMATITIS, 2005, 16 (02) : 80 - 86
  • [43] Allergic contact dermatitis from carrot
    Murdoch, SR
    Dempster, J
    CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2000, 42 (04) : 236 - 236
  • [44] Allergic contact dermatitis from tacrolimus
    Shaw, DW
    Eichenfield, LF
    Shainhouse, T
    Maibach, HI
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2004, 50 (06) : 962 - 965
  • [45] Allergic Contact Dermatitis from Cigarettes
    Glick, Zoey R.
    Saedi, Nazanin
    Ehrlich, Alison
    DERMATITIS, 2009, 20 (01) : 6 - 13
  • [46] Allergic contact dermatitis from tacalcitol
    Kimura, K
    Katayama, I
    Nishioka, K
    CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1995, 33 (06) : 441 - 442
  • [47] Allergic contact dermatitis from a degreaser
    Kerre, S.
    Matura, M.
    Goossens, A.
    CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2006, 55 (02) : 117 - 118
  • [48] Allergic contact dermatitis from ethylhexylglycerin
    Linsen, G
    Goossens, A
    CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2002, 47 (03) : 169 - 169
  • [49] Allergic contact dermatitis from indomethacin
    Pulido, Z
    González, E
    Alfaya, T
    Alvarez, JA
    Ceña, M
    de la Hoz, B
    CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1999, 41 (02) : 112 - 112
  • [50] ALLERGIC CONTACT DERMATITIS FROM NYSTATIN
    WASILEWSKI, C
    ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGY, 1971, 104 (04) : 437 - +