Allergic contact dermatitis from methyldibromoglutaronitrile

被引:7
|
作者
Bruze, M [1 ]
Gruvberger, B
Goossens, A
Hindsén, M
Pontén, A
机构
[1] Malmo Univ Hosp, Dept Occupat & Environm Dermatol, S-20502 Malmo, Sweden
[2] Katholieke Univ Leuven Hosp, Dept Dermatol, Louvain, Belgium
关键词
D O I
10.2310/6620.2005.04032
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Background. Arriving at a diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis is a multistep procedure including the establishing of contact allergy, demonstration of current exposure to the sensitizer, and assessment of clinical relevance. Sometimes, these steps are easy to get through; at other times, there may be problems with every step. Objective: To demonstrate the possible difficulties and pitfalls in establishing the presence of contact allergy and diagnosing allergic contact dermatitis from exposure to the preservative methyldibromoglutaronitrile (MDBGN). Methods: Simultaneous patch-testing with petrolatum preparations of MDBGN at various concentrations, use testing, and chemical analysis with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Results: Contact allergy to MDBGN was established in two cases, with MDBGN in petrolatum at 0.5%. Results of HPLC investigation of moisturizers used by the patients and yielding positive results on patch and use tests disagreed with the information about preservatives on the labels of the moisturizers and with the Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDSs). Conclusions: Patch testing with MDBGN in petrolatum at a concentration of less than 0.5% may fail to diagnose a clinically relevant contact allergy. The information on labels of products, on MSDSs, and from manufacturers may not be reliable, which indicates the need for chemical analyses.
引用
收藏
页码:80 / 86
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Occupational allergic contact dermatitis to methyldibromoglutaronitrile in hand degreasing toilet paper
    Marcano, M. E.
    Heras, F.
    Conde-Salazar, L.
    [J]. CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2007, 57 (02) : 126 - U7
  • [2] Methyldibromoglutaronitrile in rinse-off products causes allergic contact dermatitis:: an experimental study
    Jensen, CD
    Johansen, JD
    Menné, T
    Andersen, KE
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2004, 150 (01) : 90 - 95
  • [3] Allergic contact dermatitis and systemic contact dermatitis from cinchocaine
    Marques, C
    Faria, E
    Machado, A
    Goncalo, M
    Goncalo, S
    [J]. CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1995, 33 (06) : 443 - 443
  • [4] Allergic contact dermatitis from myrrh
    Gallo, R
    Rivara, G
    Cattarini, G
    Cozzani, E
    Guarrera, M
    [J]. CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1999, 41 (04) : 230 - 231
  • [5] Allergic contact dermatitis from tromantadine
    Jauregui, I
    Urrutia, I
    Gamboa, PM
    Antepara, I
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIONAL ALLERGOLOGY & CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1997, 7 (04): : 260 - 261
  • [6] Allergic contact dermatitis from gold
    Wiesner, M
    Pambor, M
    [J]. CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1998, 38 (01) : 52 - 53
  • [7] Allergic contact dermatitis from calcipotriol
    Park, YK
    Lee, JH
    Chung, WG
    [J]. ACTA DERMATO-VENEREOLOGICA, 2002, 82 (01) : 71 - 72
  • [8] CONTACT ALLERGIC DERMATITIS FROM OATMEAL
    RIBOLDI, A
    PIGATTO, PD
    ALTOMARE, GF
    GIBELLI, E
    [J]. CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1988, 18 (05) : 316 - 317
  • [9] Allergic contact dermatitis from enoxolone
    Tanaka, S
    Otsuki, T
    Matsumoto, Y
    Hayakawa, R
    Sugiura, M
    [J]. CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2001, 44 (03) : 192 - 192
  • [10] Allergic contact dermatitis from lanoconazole
    Nakano, R
    Miyoshi, H
    Kanzaki, T
    [J]. CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1996, 35 (01) : 63 - 63